medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Radiología, México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2007, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2007; 6 (4)

Anomalías de la médula espinal en pacientes pediátricos

Carrasco CAL, Solórzano MSA, Gómez GG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 313-319
PDF size: 827.11 Kb.


Key words:

Pediatric spinal cord, magnetic resonance, congenital malformations, pediatrics, dysraphysm.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To review main clinical Magnetic resonance applications in congenital malformations of the spinal cord in pediatric patients.
Materials and methods: One LG of 1.5 tesla Resonance-Compatible Incubator was used. 95 cases turned to the Pediatric National Institute (Instituto Nacional de Pediatría) between March 10, 2005 and August 25, 2007. According to the Department protocol, images of sagital, coronary and axial planes were obtained with relaxing times in T1, T2 with gadolineum and myelographic effect.
Results: Of the 95 children, 40% showed spinal cord anomalies, from which, in frequency showed: open and occult spinal dysraphism. 30 (70%), disorders derived from non disjunction 15 (39%), disorders derived from premature disjunction 8 (21%), anomalies of the caudal cell mass 10 (26%), malformations of the medulla division 5 (13%).
Conclusion: Magnetic resonance proves pathological anatomical changes in the pediatric spinal cord. Boys predominated compared to girls 4-2 associated to anorectal and genitourinary malformations. Sacrum and spinal cord were thoroughly evaluated since most of spinal dysraphysms were associated to Tethered cord syndrome showed lesser gastrointestinal and urogenital alterations, as VACTERL. MR is a non-invasive method and an optimal technique for the post-operation follow up of these patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Barcovich AJ. Comtemporary Neuroimagen Pediatric. 3rd. Ed. New York: Traducido en Buenos Aires; 2001, p. 240-68.

  2. Haaga JR. CT and lmaging of the Whole Body. 4a. Ed. Cleveland, Ohio: 2004, p. 783-95.

  3. Magnetic Resonance lmagning of the pediatrics pine (published erratum appears in Radiographics 1988 May; 8(3); 589).

  4. Barr RM. Magnetic Resonance Evaluation of Spinal dysraphism in children. Childs Nerv syst AJR 1990; 6(3); 161-5.

  5. Davis PC, Hoffman JC, et al. Spinal abnormalities in pediatrics patients MR findings compared with clinical. Radiology 1998; 166: 679-85.

  6. Byrd ShE, Darlyng CF, Mc Lone DG. Developmental disrodersof pediatrics spine. Radiologic Clin Nort Am 1991; 29(4): 711-52.

  7. Grossmn R. Neurorradiología 2nd. New York; 2006, p. 245-8.

  8. Olsen WL. Magnetic Resonance lmaging of Pediatric Spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2003; 11(4): 248-59.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Anales de Radiología México. 2007;6