Hernández-Miranda H, Martínez-Ortiz E, Calderón-Yáñez MA, Soto-Rivera B

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 176-180
PDF size: 94.10 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The present project is a longitudinal type study, it is prospective, comparative and open, done within a population of 50 pregnant patients who were programmed for a caesarean operation, between 18 and 45 years of age, without any suffering of acute fetal syndrome, classified with ASA I-II, weighting no more than 90 kg, high school as minimum study level completed and completing a fast of at least 8 hours. The separation into two groups in the study was determined randomly. The patients who received 0.75% ropivacaine plus 13 mL more of fentanyl (2 mL) peridural were labeled as group (A), and patients who received only 0.75% ropivacaine to 0.75% (15 mL) were determined to be group (B). Fifty patients of an average age of 28.5 were studied, their average weight was 75.5 kg. The latency period was evaluated in both groups. A shorter latency period was found in group A in relation to group B with p = .000 with U of Mann-Whitney. In relation to the quality of anesthesia, it was good in both groups. In relation to post-operation pain, it presented itself later in group A p =.000 measured with U of Mann-Whitney. The heart rate and the arterial pressure went down in both groups p =.000. Conclusion: The combination of ropivacaine 0.75% plus peridural fentanyl during the caesarean operation lowers the latency period, gives good anesthesia quality and prolongs the post-operation analgesic time.

REFERENCES

1. Koller C. On the use of cocaine for producing anesthesia on the eye. Lancet 1884;2:990-992.

2. Whizar LV, Carrada PS. Ropivacaína: una novedosa alternativa en anestesia regional. Rev. Mex Anest 1999;22:122-152.

3. Marrón-Peña M, Rivera-Flores J. Ropivacaína neuroaxial para operación cesárea. Rev Mex Anest 2008;31:133-138.

4. Torres G, et al. Anestesia peridural con ropivacaína vs bupivacaína para cirugía abdominal en pacientes ginecológicas. Rev Mex Anest 2002;25:29-33.

5. Peña-Riverón AA y cols. Comparación clínica de ropivacaína y bupivacaína para bloqueo de plexo braquial por abordaje axilar mediante neuroestimulación. Rev Mex Anest 2009;32:7-13.

6. Cortés MA y cols. Anestesia peridural con mezcla de ropivacaína, lidocaína y fentanilo para operación cesárea. Rev Mex Anest 2000;23(3).

7. Ojeda VJF y cols. Anestesia subaracnoidea para cesárea, efectividad de ropivacaína con fentanilo a diferentes dosis para acortar latencia. An Med (Mex) 2008;53:127-131.

8. Córdova AJ y cols. Analgesia postcesárea con sulfato de morfina en infusión peridural. Rev Mex Anest 2000;23:20-24.

9. Cousins MJ, Bromage PR. Peridural neural blockade. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO: Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain. 2nd Ed. Philadelphia JB Lippincott Company, 1988: p. 253-360.

10. Covino BG, Vassallo HG. Clinical aspects of local anesthesia. In: Covino BG, Vassallo HG: Local anesthetics. mechanisms of action and clinical use. 1st Ed. New York. Grune & Stratton Inc. 1976: p.57-94.

11. Hong JY, et al. Effects of epidural fentanyl on speed and quality of block for emergency cesarean section in extending continuous epidural labor analgesia using ropivacaine and fentanyl. J Korean Med Sci 2010;25:287-92.

12. Côrtes CA y cols. Estudo comparativo entre bupivacaína a 0.5%, mistura enantiomérica de bupivacaína (S75-R25) a 0.5% e ropivacaína a 0.75% associadas ao fentanil em anestesia peridural para cesarianas. Rev Bras de Anestesiol. 2003;53:2:177-187.

13. Whizar LVM, Carrada PS. Ropivacaína. Una novedosa alternativa en anestesia regional. Rev Mex Anest 1999;22:122-152.

14. González SJM y cols. Ropivacaína vs bupivacaína por vía espinal. Rev Mex Anest 2001;24:217-20.

15. Willie M. Intrathecal use of ropivacaine: A review. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2004;55:251-59.

16. Landau R, Schiffer E, Morales M, et al. The dose-sparing effect of clonidine added to ropivacaine for labor epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 2002;95:728-734.

17. Ávila LA, Chávez JR. Anestesia espinal con dexmedetomidina más ropivacaína 0.75% vs ropivacaína 0.75%. Rev Anest Méx (Supl) 2005:439.

18. Thomas H, Asskali F, Vettermann J. Addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine-peridural analgesia in cesarean section. Anaesthesist 1996;45:635-42.

19. Marrón PM, Rivera FJ. Ropivacaína subaracnoidea en cesárea. Boletín SMAGO 2006;3:4-5.

20. Torres GV, Torres HM. Anestesia peridural con ropivacaína vs bupivacaína para la cirugía abdominal en pacientes ginecológicas. Rev Mex Anest 2002;25:29-33.

21. Milligan KR. Recent advances in local anaesthetics for spinal anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004;21:837-47.

22. Datta S, Camann W, et al. Clinical effects and maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean section. Anesthesiology 1995;82:1346-1352.