medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Plástica

ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2000, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2000; 10 (2)

Centrofacial lifting. Updated concept

Fuente CA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 65-71
PDF size: 354.39 Kb.


Key words:

Centrofacial lifting, facelift, ageing..

ABSTRACT

The centrofacial lifting is a procedure which has widely proved its benefits and advantages to correct the effects of the aging process on the centrofacial area, establishing a new point of view with several indications and great benefits for the patients. Many authors that are enthusiastic about the results obtained have developed variations. A procedure with technical details and manoeuvres developed to get better results and less complications is described, based on the experience of 564 cases, over a period of 10 years, displaying indications, complications and long term results.


REFERENCES

  1. Fuente del Campo A. Centrofacial Lifting Perspectives in Plastic Surg 1993; 7: 87-99.

  2. Fuente del Campo A. The subperiosteal rhytidectomy and the lower lid incision approach to the nasolabial fold. Surgical restoration of the ageing face. Edit Bernard BW Butterworwth-Heinemann 1996: 169-194.

  3. Hagerty RC. Central Suspension Technique of the Midface. Plast Recostr Surg 1995; 96: 728-730.

  4. McCord CD. Redraping the Inferior Orbicularis Arc. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 2471-2479.

  5. Hobar PC, Flood J. Subperiosteal Rejuvenation of the Midface and Periorbital Area: A Simplified Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 842-851.

  6. Moelleken B. The Superficial Subciliary Cheek Lift, a Technique for Rejuvenating the Infraorbital Region and Nasojugal Groove: A Clinical Series of 71 Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104: 1863-1874.

  7. Hester RT, Vodner MA, McCord CD. The Centrofacial Approach for correction of facial aging using the Transblepharoplasty Subperiosteal Cheek Lift. Aesthetic Surg Quart 1999; 16: 51-58.

  8. Gunter JR. A Simplified Transblepharoplasty Subperiosteal Cheek Lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 103: 2029-2036.

  9. Fuente del Campo A. Face lift without preauricular scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 92: 642.

  10. Fuente del Campo A. Mini-invasive Facial Rejuvenation Without and Endoscope. Aesth Surg Quart 1996; 16: 129-137.

  11. Fuente del Campo A. The Endo-Facelift, Basic and Options. Clin Plast Surg 1997; 24: 309-327.

  12. Fuente del Campo A, Gordon BC, Kiesler Bergman O. Evolution From Endoscopic to Miniinvasive Facelift: A Logical Progression. Aesth Plast Surg 1998; 22: 267-275.

  13. Zufferey J. Anatomic variations of the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89: 225.

  14. Barton FE. The SMAS and the nasolabial fold. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89: 1054.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Plast. 2000;10