medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina & Laboratorio

ISSN 2500-7106 (Electronic)
ISSN 0123-2576 (Print)
Medicina & Laboratorio
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 09-10

<< Back Next >>

Medicina & Laboratorio 2010; 16 (09-10)

Enfermedades difusas del hígado: evaluación con resonancia magnética

Pulgarín RLG, Rascovsky RS, Delgado BJA, Llano SJF, Vélez AJM, JSanz RJA, Calvo BVD
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 459-468
PDF size: 506.67 Kb.


Key words:

MRI, diffuse liver disease, cirrhosis.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Until the end of the 20th century, diffuse liver disease was a difficult diagnosis through imaging methods and its confirmation was only possible with liver biopsy and its histopathologic result. Currently, advanced MRI techniques can make possible a more reliable diagnosis of these diseases with a non-invasive technique, compared to other imaging methods and diagnostic modalities. Objective: To describe the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of various diffuse liver diseases. Methods: A descriptive case series was performed with patients with diffuse liver disease who attended a health care institution specialized in MRI services. Results: There were four cases with cirrhosis of different etiologies: one caused by hepatitis B and hepatocellular carcinoma, and with an associated diffuse malignant thrombosis of the portal vein, another caused by hepatitis C, the third of vascular origin (congestive), and a case of alcoholic cirrhosis. Similarly two other cases were evaluated for steatosis, one with a focal non-infiltrative area and one with generalized fatty liver infiltration. In addition, a secondary hemochromatosis case was analyzed. Conclusion: MRI becomes a non-invasive diagnostic tool that does not involve exposure to ionizing radiation, useful for preoperative evaluation and monitoring of diffuse liver diseases, regardless of its etiology.


REFERENCES

  1. Dancygier H. Clinical Hepatology: Principles and Practice of Hepatobiliary Diseases. Volume 2. Berlin: Springer; 2010.

  2. Braga L, Semelka RC, Armao D. Liver. In: Semelka RC, editor. Abdominal-Pelvic MRI. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley and sons Inc; 2006. p. 47–445.

  3. Anthony PP, Ishak KG, Nayak NC, Poulsen HE, Scheuer PJ, Sobin LH. The morphology of cirrhosis: definition, nomenclature, and classification. Bull World Health Organ 1977; 55: 521-540.

  4. Valls C, Iannacconne R, Alba E, Murakami T, Hori M, Passariello R, et al. Fat in the liver: diagnosis and characterization. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2292–2308.

  5. Stark D. Hepatic iron overload: paramagnetic pathology. Radiology 1991; 179: 333-335.

  6. Bonkovsky H, Rubin R, Cable E, et al. Hepatic iron concentracion: noninvasive estimation by means of MR imaging techniques. Radiology 1999; 212: 227-234.

  7. Danrad R, Martin DR. MR imaging of diffuse liver diseases. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005; 13: 277–293.

  8. Low RN. Abdominal MRI advances in the detection of liver tumours and char- acterisation. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8: 525–535.

  9. Taouli B, Ehman RL, Reeder SB. Advanced MRI methods for assessment of chronic liver disease. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 14–27.

  10. Chandarana H, Taouli B. Diffusion and perfusion imaging of the liver. Eur J Radiol (2010), doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.03.016

  11. Ros PR, Mortele KJ. Diffuse liver disease. Clin Liver Dis 2002; 6: 181-201.

  12. Balci1 NC, Befeler AS, Leiva P, Pilgram TK, Havlioglu N. Imaging of liver disease: Comparison between quadruple-phase multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 23: 1529-1527.

  13. Boll DT, Merkle EM. Diffuse Liver Disease: Strategies for Hepatic CT and MR Imaging Radiographics 2009; 29: 1591-1614.

  14. Semelka RC, Martin DR, Balci C, Lance T. Focal liver lesions: comparison of dual-phase CT and multisequence multiplanar MR imaging including dynamic gadolinium enhancement. J. Magn. Reson Imaging 2001; 13: 397–401.

  15. Noone TC, Semelka RC, Chaney DM, Reinhold C. Abdominal imaging studies: comparison of diagnostic accuracies resulting from ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the same individual. Magn. Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 19–24.

  16. Kamel IR, Liapi E, Fishman EK. Liver and biliary system: evaluation by multidetector CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2005; 43: 977–997.

  17. Oto A, Tamm EP, Szklaruk J. Multidetector row CT of the liver. Radiol Clin North Am 2005; 43: 827–848.

  18. Winterer JT, Kotter E, Ghanem N, Langer M. Detection and characterization of benign focal liver lesions with multislice CT. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2427–2443.

  19. Semelka RC, Armao DM, Elias J Jr, Huda W. Imaging strategies to reduce the risk of radiation in CT studies, including selective substitution with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 900–909.

  20. Danet IM, Semelka RC, Braga L. MR imaging of diffuse liver disease. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41: 67-87.

  21. Martin D, Danrad R, Hussain S. MR imaging of the liver. Radiol Clin N Am 2005; 43: 861-886.

  22. Danrad R, Martin DR. MR imaging of diffuse liver diseases. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005; 13: 277–293.

  23. Semelka RC, Martin DR, Balci NC. Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: how I do it. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 632–637.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Medicina & Laboratorio. 2010;16