medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Mediciego

ISSN 1029-3035 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Mediciego 2011; 17 (1)

Low-dose misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy terminations

Molina MR, Reyes RW, Ortiz MN
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page:
PDF size: 45.29 Kb.


Key words:

MISOPROSTOL/administration and dosage, ABORTION, INDUCED.

ABSTRACT

A descriptive study of 142 pregnant women it´s presented to which they underwent second trimester pregnancy terminations between 14 and 24 weeks in Gyneco-Obstetric service from University Hospital "Dr. Antonio Luaces Iraola" from Ciego de Avila, during January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007. The aim was to demonstrate the efficacy of 600 mg. of misoprostol as an interruption method. A questionnaire was designed which includes the main study variables: age, causes of pregnancy termination, the duration of expulsion, doses, method result and adverse effects. The main results are women under 20 years with 41.5%, they represented. The higher percent (54%) of patients expelled with the second dose, 64% of patients expelled in 24 hours, and 89.4% of them did so within 36 hours. In 89.4% achieved a complete abortion, 92.9% of patients had pain in lower abdomen. It is concluded that the procedure is a very effective method for second trimester pregnancy terminations.


REFERENCES

  1. Say L, Kulier R, Gülmezoglu M, Campana A. Métodos médicos versus métodos quirúrgicos para la interrupción del embarazo en el primer trimestre (Revisión Cochrane traducida) [Internet] Oxford: La Biblioteca Cochrane Plus; 2006 [citado 13 Feb 2008]; [aprox. 8 pantallas]. Disponible en: http://cochrane.bvsalud.org/portal/php/index.php?lang=es

  2. Royston E, Armstrong S. Preventig maternal deaths. Geneva: WHO; 1989.

  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction and augmentation of labor. ACOG Tech Bull. 1995; 217: 39-48.

  4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of labor with misoprostol. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2000; 69:77-8.

  5. Saha S, Bal R, Ghosh S, Krishnamurthy P. Induction of labor with misoprostol. J Indian Med Assoc. 2006; 104(2):81-2, 84.

  6. Capilla C, Bermejo T. Eficacia y seguridad de misoprostol en Obstetricia. Farm Hosp. 2005; 29:177-184.

  7. Menakaya U, Otoide V, Omo L, Odunsi K, Okonofua F. Experience with misoprostol in the management of missed abortion in the second trimestre. J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 25:583-585.

  8. Caliskan E, Dilbaz D. Doger E, Ozeren S, Dilbaz B. Randomized comparison of 3 misoprostol protocols for abortion induction at 13-20 weeks of gestation. J Reprod Med. 2005; 50:173-80.

  9. Dickinson JE, Evans SF. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193(2): 597.

  10. Ruangchainikhom W, Phongphissanou E, Bhekasuta J, Sarapak S. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006; 89(7):928-33.

  11. Herabutya Y, Chanrachakul B, Punyavachira P. Induction of labor with misoprostol. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2000; 26(2):121-5AC.

  12. Rodríguez A, Velazco A. Uso de 800 mg de misoprostol para inducir el aborto temprano. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol. 2003; 29(2): 23-30.

  13. Carbonell J Ll, Varela L, Velazco A, Tanda R, C Sánchez. Misoprostol vaginal para el aborto del segundo trimestre temprano. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol. 2000; 26(1):28-35.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Mediciego. 2011;17