medigraphic.com

2011, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cuba Endoc 2011; 22 (3)

Waist-hip index versus waist circumference for diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in first degree-children and adolescents relatives of persons with type 1 diabetes

Cabrera-Rode E, Bioti TY, Marichal MS, Parlá SJ, Arranz CC, Olano JR, González FP, Vera GM

Language: Spanish
References: 35
Page: 182-195
PDF size: 112.98 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: to compare the measurements of waist circumference and waist-hip circumference to determine the frequency of metabolic syndrome in first degree relatives of persons with type 1diabetes, using different pediatric definitions.
Methods: two hundred twenty four first degree relatives of persons with type 1 diabetes were studied in ages from 4 to 10 years. Weight, height, waist-hip circumference, blood pressure, glycemia, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol were determined. The definitions of metabolic syndrome according to Cook, Ford, International Federation of Diabetes and the Cuban consensus were applied. A variant of Cuban consensus was performed using: body mass index and waist-hip index according the Cuban tables, values of glucose ≥ 5,6 mmol/L and blood pressure ≥ 90 percentile (Cuban tables). In an independent way, criteria of HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides were taken into account. The waist-hip index of Cuban tables, the waist circumference suggested by the Latin-American and European Association of Diabetes for study definitions were applied. For comparison of frequencies of metabolic syndrome the Fisher exact test was used.
Results: the frequency of metabolic syndrome with application of Cuban consensus variant was of 9,37 % (21/224). Comparing the above variant with the definitions of Cook, Ford and of the International Federation of Diabetes (using the waist circumference of the Latin-American Association of Diabetes, there was a significant difference between Cook and the International Federation of Diabetes (4,01 %, p= 0,0360; 1,33 %, p= 0,0002, respectively). Comparing the presence of metabolic syndrome of the Cuban consensus variant with Cook (8,48 %; 19/224) and Ford (8,93 %; 20/224) taking into account the waist-hip index of the Cuban tables, it is possible to detect similar frequencies of first degree relatives of persons with type 1 diabetes with metabolic syndrome. On the other hand, we found significant differences comparing the frequencies of metabolic syndrome of the Cuban consensus variant (p= 0,0019), of Cook (p= 0,0053) and of Ford (p= 0,0032) with the definition suggested by the International Federation of Diabetes (2,23 %; 5/224) using the waist-hip index.
Conclusions: our data demonstrate that for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome we must to use the waist-hip index and not the circumference suggested by the Latin- American Association of Diabetes, still without to present own data of waist-hip circumference of the Cuban population.


REFERENCES

  1. Alberti KGMM, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1 640-5.

  2. Rosas Guzmán J, Torres Tamayo M, Calzada León R, Sinay I, Costa Gil J, de Loredo L, et al. Guía ALAD Diagnóstico, control, prevención y tratamiento del síndrome metabólico en pediatría. Revista de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Diabetes. 2009; XVII:16-31.

  3. Cruz ML, Goran MI. The Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents. Curr Diab Rep. 2004;4:53-62.

  4. Cook S, Weitzman M, Auinger P, Nguyen M, Dietz W. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome phenotype in adolescents: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:821-7.

  5. Calderin RO, Prieto M, Cabrera E. Síndrome de insulinorresistencia en niños y adolescentes. Rev Cubana Endocrinol [serie en internet]. 2007 [citado 4 de julio de 2011];18(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1561-29532007000200007&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  6. Tapia Ceballos. Síndrome metabólico en la infancia. An Pediatr (Barc). 2007;66(2):159-66.

  7. Dobbelsteyn C, Joffres M, MacLean D, Flowerdew G. A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indication of cardiovascular risk factors: the Canadian Health Surveys. Int Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25:652-61.

  8. Janssen I, Heymsfield S, Allison D, Kotler D, Roos R. Body mass index and waist circumference independently contribute to the prediction of nonabdominal, abdominal subcuaneous, and visceral fat. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;75:683-8.

  9. Maffeis C, Pietrobelli A, Grezzani A, Provera S, Tato L. Waist circumference and cardiovascular risk factors in prepuberal children. Obes Res. 2001;9:179-87.

  10. Savva S, Tornaritis M, Savva M, Kourides Y, Panagi A, Silikiotou N, et al. Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children than body mass index. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:1453-8.

  11. Khoo CM, Liew CF, Chew SK, Tai ES. The impact of central obesity as a prerequisite for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007;15:262-9.

  12. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ, Shaw JE. The Metabolic Syndrome-A New Wordlwide Definition from the International Diabetes Federation Consensus. Lancet. 2005;366:1 059-62.

  13. Callaway CW, Chumlea WC, Bouchard C, Himes JH, Lohman TG, Martin AD, et al. Circumferences. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, editors. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Campaign: Human Kinetics Books; 1991. p. 44-5.

  14. Hernández M. El patrón de crecimiento humano y su evaluación. En: Pombo A. Tratado de Endocrinología Pediátrica. Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2002. p. 244-74.

  15. Ford ES, Ajan UA, Mokdad AH. The metabolic syndrome and concentrations of Creactive protein among US. Youth. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:878-81.

  16. Tapia Ceballos L, López Siguero JP, Jurado Ortiz A. Prevalencia del síndrome metabólico y sus componentes en niños y adolescentes con obesidad. An Pediatr (Barc). 2007;67:352-61.

  17. Zimmet P, Alberti G, Kaufman F, Tajima N, Silink M, Arslanian S, et al. El síndrome metabólico en niños y adolescentes: el consenso de la IDF. Diabetes Voice. 2007;52:29-32.

  18. Trinder P. Determination of glucose oxidase with one alternative oxygen acceptor. Ann Clin Biochem. 1969;6:24-7.

  19. Barti K, Ziegenhorn J. Methods of enzymatic analysis. J Bermeyer VCH Weinheim, Germany. 1985;VII:134-46.

  20. Díaz-Horta O, Cintado A, Fernández-De-Cossio ME, Nazabal M, Ferrer A, Roca J, et al. Relationship of type 1 diabetes to ancestral proportions and HLA DR/DQ alleles in a simple of the admixed Cuban population. Ann Hum Biol. 2010;37:778-88.

  21. Bosy A, Geisler C, Onur S, Korth O, Selberg O, Schrezenmeir J and Mûller MJ. Value of body fat mass vs anthropometric obesity indices in the assessment of metabolic risk factors. International Journal of Obesity. 2006;30:475-83.

  22. De Ferranti SD, Osganian SK. Epidemiology of paediatric metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2007;4:285-96.

  23. Nelson RA, Bremer AA. Insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome in the pediatric population. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2010;8:1-14.

  24. Ford E, Giles W, Dietz W. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 2002;287:356-9.

  25. Mills GW, Avery P, McCarthy M, Hattersley AT, Levy JC, Hitman GA, et al. Heritability estimates for beta cell function and features of the insulin resistance syndrome in UK families with anincreased susceptibility to type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2004;47:732-8.

  26. Chen W, Bao W, Begum S, Elkasabany A, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Agerelated patterns of the clustering of cardiovascular risk variables of syndrome X from childhood to young adulthood in a population made up of black and white subjects: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Diabetes. 2000;49:1 042-8.

  27. Cabrera-Rode E, Marichal S, Parlá J, Arranz C, González R, Pérez C, González P, Vera M, Díaz-Horta O. Frequency and characteristics of metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in the first-degree relatives of persons with type 1 diabetes. Endocrinol Nutr. 2010;57:311-21.

  28. Casavalle P, Romano L, Maselli M, Pandolfo M, Ramos M, Caamaño A, et al. Prevalencia de síndrome metabólico según diferentes criterios en niños y adolescentes con sobrepeso y obesidad. ALAD. 2010;XVIII(3):112-9.

  29. Steimberger J, Daniels SR. Obesity, Insulin Resistance, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Risk in Children. Circulation. 2003;107:1 448- 53.

  30. Sinaiko AR, Donahue RP, Jacobs DR, Princas RJ. Relation of Weight and Rate of Increase in Weight during Childhood and Adolescence to Body Size, Blood Pressure, Fasting Insulin and Lipids in Young Adults. The Minneapolis Children's Blood Pressure Study. Circulation. 1999;99:1 471-6.

  31. Marcos NJ, Núñez GM, Salinas AM, Santos M, Decanini H. Obesidad como Factor de Riesgo para Trastornos Metabólicos en Adolescentes Mexicanos, 2005. Rev Salud Pública. 2007;9(2):180-93.

  32. Vergès B. Lipid disorders in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2009;35:353-60.

  33. Revenga J, González EM, Bueno G, De Miguel P, Velasco P, Rey JP, et al. Abdominal fat and metabolic risk in obese children and adolescents. J Physiol Biochem. 2009;65(4):415-20.

  34. Cruz M, Weigensberg M, Huang T, Ball G, Shaibi G, Goran M. The Metabolic Syndrome in Overweight Hispanic youth and the role of Insulin sensitivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:108-13.

  35. Esquivel M, Rubén M, González C, Rodríguez L, Tamayo V. Curvas de crecimiento de la circunferencia de la cintura en niños y adolescentes habaneros. Rev Cubana Pediatr. 2011;83:44-55.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com