medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-4360 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Periodontología, Colegio de Periodoncistas A.C

2011, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Periodontol 2011; 2 (3)

Guide bone regeneration in esthetic zone: Maxillary bone exostosis use as a block graft and ePTFE membrane

Cantú LLA, Montemayor MR, Llamosa CL, Martínez SG

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 97-102
PDF size: 142.99 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The objective of this case was to evaluate the clinical results obtained in the reconstruction of the alveolar process of the residual defect found after the extraction of a tooth with a lesion in the esthetic zone endoperiodontal (2.2). ROG procedure was a combined technique of autogenous block graft donated a maxillary exostosis, plus the use of non-resorbable membrane and allograft ePTFE. The results obtained after four months was the increase in alveolar bone volume of rearranged with a profit of 8 mm in width (V-P). The exostosis to be an autogenous bone graft provides osteogenic properties, osteoconductive and osteoinductive so use it as a block graft is an alternative to lower morbidity, conservative and pro in combination with a traditional ROG technique for the reconstruction of edges in preparation prior to dental implant placement.


REFERENCES

  1. Moghadam HG. Vertical and horizontal bone augmentation with the intraoral autogenous j-graft. Implant Dentistry 2009; 18 (3).

  2. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations. JOMI 2004; 19: 43-61.

  3. Chiapasco M, Abati S, Romeo E, Vogel G. Clinical outcome of autogenous bone blocks or guided bone regeneration with e-PTFE membranes for the reconstruction of narrow edentulous ridges. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 278-288.

  4. Chiapasco, Zaniboni, Boisco. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 2006; 17 suppl 2: 136-159.

  5. Armitage GC. Research, science and therapy committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. Diagnosis of periodontol diseases. J Periodontol 2003; 74 (8): 1237-47.

  6. McGuire M, Nunn M. Prognosis versus actival outcome II. The effectiveness of clinical parameters in developing an accurate prognosis. J Periodontol 1996; 67 (7): 658-65.

  7. Seymour & Hogg. Antobiotics and chemoprophylaxis. Periodontology 2000; 46: 2008, 80-108.

  8. Slots & Jorgensen. Effective, safe, practical and affordable periodontal antimicrobial therapy: where are we going, and are we there yet? Periodontology 2000; 28: 2002, 298-312.

  9. Herrera A, León, Roldán, Sanz. Antimicrobial therapy in periodontitis: the use of systematic antimicrobials against the subgingival biofilm. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35 (suppl 8): 45-66. Review.

  10. Simon, Gick, Frank. The relationship of endodontic-periodontic lesions. J Periodontol 1972; 43 (4): 202-8.

  11. Misch CE. Divisions of available bone in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol 1990; 7: 9-17.

  12. Greenstein G. Role of bone decortication in enhancing the results of guided bone regeneration: A literature review. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 175-189.

  13. Alexandre-Amir Aalam, Hessam Nowzari. Mandibular cortical bone grafts Part 1: Anatomy, healing process, and influencing factors. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007; 28 (4): 206-12.

  14. Cristoph HF, Hämmerle & Ronald E. Jung bone augmentation by means of barrier membranes. Periodontology 2000; 33 (2003): 36-53.

  15. Jovanovic, Nevins M. Bone formation utilizing titanium-reinforced barrier membranes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1995; 15: 57-69.

  16. Buser D, Dula K, Hess D et al. Localized ridge augmentation with autografts and barrier membranes. Periodontol 2000, 1999; 19: 151-163.

  17. Hallman M, Thor A. Bone substitutes and growth factors as an alternative/ complement to autogenous bone for grafting in implant dentistry. Periodontology 2000, 2008; 47: 172-192.

  18. Tinti C, Parma-Benfenati S. Vertical ridge augmentation: Surgical protocol and retrospective evaluation of 48 consecutively inserted implants. Int J Perio Rest Dent 1998; 18 (5): 434-443.

  19. Tolstunov L. Maxillary tuberosity block bone graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009.

  20. Pedersen GW. Oral surgery, Philadelphia, WB Saunders 1998; 119-147.

  21. Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Keil K & Wegscheider WA. Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 639-646.

  22. Verardi S, Simion M. Management of the exposure of ePTFE membranes in guided bone regeneration. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007; 19 (2): 111-7.

  23. Buser D, Martin WC, Belser UC. Surgical considerations for single-tooth replacements in the esthetic zone: Standard procedure in site without bone deficiencies. ITI Treatment Guide volume 1-4.1




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com