medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Enfermería

ISSN 1561-2961 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cuba Enf 2011; 27 (2)

Conceptions and perceptions on health, quality of life and physical activity in an academic health unit

Hernández SJ, Forero BCM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 41
Page: 159-170
PDF size: 159.41 Kb.


Key words:

Conceptions, perceptions, physical activity, health quality of life.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Behaviors related to health are measured between other features by the subject's conceptions and perceptions.
Objective: To identify the conceptions and perceptions related with health, the quality of life, human body movement (HBM), physical activity (FA) and its determinant factors in the academic community of the Health Faculty- Industry University of Santander. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted including focal groups and semi-structural interviews with the participations of students of all levels and professors of the Faculty and its selection was by suitability. Data analysis was made during research, using the Ethnograph v5.08 Program with a pre-categorization and categorization from three axes: to feel, to be and to want to be; interpretation was by means of theoretical triangulation. Results: The systematization allows location of two key categories: first, leads to a speech where practice is not consolidated. The second one, account for expectations of an integral training, where it is necessary a contextualization of AF, consolidated in a interdisciplinary proposal allowing the conceptualization and integration of an active lifestyle. Conclusions: It was established that the conceptions and perceptions are related to a learning achieved in academy and/or as part of the experiences of participants, who are conscious of the significance of the AF for health, to recognizing a lack of actions, product of personal and institutional factors; but at the same time are pro-positives.


REFERENCES

  1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Estrategia mundial sobre el régimen alimentario, actividad física y salud. Ginebra: OMS, 2002.

  2. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Agenda de salud para las Américas 2008 2017. Washington: OPS/OMS, 2007.

  3. Global Advocacy Council of Physical Activity, International Society for Physical Activity and Health. The Toronto charter for physical activity: A global call for action. May 8, 2010. [Citado en 2010 febrero 8]. Disponible en: http://www.jcpaph.org

  4. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Physical Activity. Ginebra [Citado en 2010 febrero 8]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/topics/physical_activity/en/

  5. Jimenez A, Montil M. Determinantes de la Práctica de Actividad Física: Bases, Fundamentos y Aplicaciones. Editorial Dykinson. 1ª ed. España 2006.

  6. Gavidia Catalán V. Salud, educación y calidad de vida: De cómo las concepciones del profesorado inciden en la salud. Bogotá: Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio, 1998.

  7. Gibson J, Ivancevich J, Donnely J. Las Organizaciones. Comportamiento, estructura y proceso. Madrid: McGraw Hill, 1997.

  8. Keating XD, Guan J, Castro J, Bridges DM. A meta-analysis of college students' physical activity behaviors. J. Am. Coll. Health 2005; 54:116-125.

  9. Haase A, Steptoe A, Sallis JF, Wardle J. Leisure-time physical activity in university students from 23 countries: associations with health beliefs, risk awareness, and national economic development. Prev Med 2004; 39:182-190. En prensa

  10. Burke SM, Carron AV, Eys MA. Physical activity context: preferences of university students. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2006; 7:1-13.

  11. Stock C, Wille L, Kramer A. Gender specific health behaviors of german university students predict the interest in campus health promotion. Health Promotion International. 2001;16:145-154.

  12. Gómez LF, Duperly J, Lucumí DI, Venegas AS. Nivel de actividad física global en la población adulta de Bogotá (Colombia). Prevalencia y factores asociados. Gac Sanit. 2005; 19:206-13.

  13. Elizondo-Armendáriz JJ, Guillén F, Aguinaga I. Prevalencia de actividad física y su relación con variables sociodemográficas y estilos de vida en la población de 18 a 65 años de Pamplona. Rev Esp Salud Pública 2005;79: 559-567.

  14. Seo D, Nehl E, Agley J, Ma S. Relations between physical activity and behavioral and perceptual correlates among midwestern college students. Journal of American College Health 2007; 56:187-197.

  15. Astudillo-García C, Rojas-Russell M. Autoeficacia y disposición al cambio para la realización de actividad física en estudiantes universitarios. Acta Colombiana de Psicología 2006;9: 41-49.

  16. Mantilla-Toloza S. Actividad física en habitantes de 15 a 49 años de una localidad de Bogotá, Colombia, 2004. Rev Salud Pública 2006; 8 suppl. 2: 69-80.

  17. Vargas-Zárate M, Becerra-Bulla F, Prieto-Suárez E. Evaluación antropométrica de estudiantes universitarios en Bogotá, Colombia. Rev. salud pública. 2008;10:433-442.

  18. Franko DL, Cousineau TM, Motivation self-efficacy, physical activity and nutrition in college students: Randomized controlled trial of an internet based education program. Prev Med 2008; 47:369377.

  19. Brunt AR, Rhee YS. Obesity and lifestyle in U.S. college students related to living arrangements. Appetite 2008; 51:615621.

  20. Hernández J. El método cualitativo y su aplicación en Fisioterapia. SaludUIS 2007; 39:105-115.

  21. Strauss A, Corbin J. Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia, 2002.

  22. Thackeray R, Neiger BL. My conceptions of focus groups: Implications for health education practice. Am J Health Educ. 2004; 35:214-216.

  23. Glitz B. The focus group technique in library research: an introduction. Bulletin Medical Library Association. 1997; 85:385-390.

  24. Lobdell DT, Gilboa S, Mendola P, Hesse BW. Use of focus groups for the environmental health researcher. J. Environ Health. 2005; 67:36-42.

  25. Qualitative Research Associates. Etnograph V.5.V8.; 2001.

  26. ,Coffey A, Atkinson P. Encontrar el sentido a los datos cualitativos. En estrategias complementarias de investigación. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia, 2003.

  27. Hernández R, Collado F, Baptista L. Metodología de la investigación. 5ª ed. México: McGraw Hill, 2010.

  28. Talavera M. El concepto de salud, definición y evolución (Monografía en Internet). [Citado en 2008 agosto 20]. Disponible en: http://www.unal.edu.co/medicina/Departamentos/Pediatria/Pediatria/EL%20CONCEPTO%20DE%20SALUD.doc

  29. Giordan A, De Vecchi G. Los orígenes del saber: de las concepciones personales a las concepciones científicas. Sevilla: Diada, 1999.

  30. González Gallego J. Fisiología de la actividad física y el deporte. Bogotá: McGraw Hill, 1992.

  31. Caspersen JC, Powell KE, Christensen GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Reports. 1985; 2:126-131.

  32. López J, Fernández A. Fisiología del ejercicio. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2008.

  33. López Chicharro J, Fernández Vaquero A. Fisiología del Ejercicio. Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2006.

  34. Jiménez A, Montil M. Determinantes de la Práctica de Actividad Física: Bases, Fundamentos y Aplicaciones. Editorial Dykinson. 1ª ed. España 2006.

  35. Bergman P, Grjibovski AM, Hagströmer M, Bauman A, Sjöström M. Adherence to physical activity recommendations and the influence of socio- demographic correlates a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health [Serial en Internet]. [Cited: 2008, Aug, 20th]. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/8/367.

  36. Sallis JF, Owen N. Physical activity behavioral medicine. USA: SAGE Publications, 1999.

  37. Stahl T, Rütfen A, Nutbeam D. The importance of policy orientation and environment on physical activity participation- comparative analysis between Eastern Germany, Western Germany and Finland. Health Promotion 2002; 17:235-246.

  38. Ministerio de la Protección Social de Colombia. Guía para el desarrollo de programas intersectoriales y comunitarios para la promoción de la actividad física. Bogotá: Ministerio de la Protección Social de Colombia, 2004.

  39. Ministerio de la Protección Social de Colombia. Decreto 3039 de 2007. Plan Nacional de Salud Pública 2007-2010. Bogotá; 10 de agosto de 2007.

  40. Machado JE. La universidad saludable. Rev de Ciencias Humanas - UTP [serie en Internet]. [Citado 2005, nov, 9]. Disponible en: http://www.utp.edu.co/~chumanas/revistas/revistas/rev26/machado.htm.scielo.sld.cu170

  41. Lanch I, Vio F. Guía para universidades saludables y otras instituciones de educación superior. Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica y Organización Mundial de la Salud, 2006.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cuba Enf. 2011;27