Simancas PMA; Herrera HAC; Arévalo TLL; Díaz CAJ; González MFD

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 89-94
PDF size: 98.36 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Tooth loss associated with systemic factors, pathological and traumatic conditions, promotes the bone resorption of residual ridges, this, creates functional problems such as lack of stability and retention of removable dentures as well as aesthetic and psychological disturbances. These defects vary depending on the amount of bone loss and soft tissue they reach. At present there are described various techniques that can correct these defects. One of these is the roll technique which shows very good results by increasing the size of the alveolar ridge and decrease aesthetic defects in the anterior area of the maxilla. The aim of this article is to describe a case of a patient with Seibert bone loss type III, rehabilitated with fixed partial denture after undergoing a surgical procedure with the roll technique achieving the stated objectives and providing aesthetic improvement to the patient and an improvement in their quality of life. It is shown that the technique can be achieved with predictable results that return aesthetics in areas of high demand from patients.

REFERENCES

1. Studer S, Naef R, Scharer P. Adjustment of localized alveolar ridge defects by soft tissue transplantation to improve mucogingival esthetics: a proposal for clinical classification and an evaluation of procedures. Quintessence Int. 1997;28(12):785- 805.

2. Scharf DR, Tarnow DP. Modified roll technique for localized alveolar ridge augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;12(5):415-25.

3. Haeri A, Clay J, Finely JM. The use of an acellular dermal skin graft to gain keratinized tissue. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999;20(3):233-4.

4. Trombelli L. Periodontal regeneration in gingival recession defects. Periodontol 2000. 1999;19:138-50.

5. Pagliaro U, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Clauser C, Pini-Prato G. Evidence-based mucogingival therapy. Part 1: A critical review of the literature on root coverage procedures. J Periodontol. 2003;74(5):709-40.

6. Wennstrom JL. Mucogingival therapy. Ann Periodontol. 1996;1(1):671-701.

7. Oringer RJ, Iacono VJ. Periodontal cosmetic surgery. J Int Acad Periodontol. 1999;1(3):83-90.

8. Abrams L. Augmentation of the deformed residual edentulous ridge for fixed prosthesis. Compend Contin Educ Gen Dent. 1980;1(3):205-13.

9. Evian CI, al-Maseeh J, Symeonides E. Soft tissue augmentation for implant dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2003;24(3):195-8, 200-6.

10. Saha S, Bateman GJ. Mucogingival grafting procedures—an update. Dent Update. 2008;35(8):561-2, 5-8.

11. Haeri A, Serio FG. Mucogingival surgical procedures: a review of the literature. Quintessence Int. 1999;30(7):475-83.

12. Miller PD. Concept of periodontal plastic surgery. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1993;5(5):15-20.

13. Meltzer JA. Edentulous area tissue graft correction of an esthetic defect. A case report. J Periodontol. 1979;50(6):320-2.

14. Clauser C, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Pagliaro U, Pini-Prato G. Evidence-based mucogingival therapy. Part 2: Ordinary and individual patient data meta-analyses of surgical treatment of recession using complete root coverage as the outcome variable. J Periodontol. 2003;74(5):741-56.