Alvarado AV, Ruiz PB, Rodriguez GMC

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 33-40
PDF size: 353.44 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: musculoskeletal injuries are extremely common problem in Mexico, but there are no statistics on the epidemiology data are in agreement with the National Health System of the prevalence of fractures that were the cause of about 85 964 hospitalizations men and women of 52 042, while dislocations and sprains, its prevalence in males was 7 486 and 3 878 women representing about 2% of the total. These injuries are bruises, fractures, sprains, dislocations and muscle injury (DOMAT), its incidence is between 10% and 55% of all these lesiones3. To identify the incidence and describe the predisposing factors of musculoskeletal injuries in sedentary adult women with risk factors for osteoporosis and initiate an exercise program to improve bone mineral density. Methods: Prospective, longitudinal, descriptive, consisting of N = 99 sedentary women 45 to 60 years old with risk factors for osteoporosis, which joined the project “Effectiveness of a physical training program to improve bone mineral density”. For statistical treatment were measured central tendency, dispersion and correlation. Results: 26% of women had lesions induced by exercise, such as patellar bursitis, sprain, grade 1 and 2, crack of tibia, periostitis and delayed onset muscle soreness or Domat. Although the physical characteristics prevalent in these women were not favorable compared with the expected parameters for age, sex and physical activity can not say that these have been the predisposing factors for injury, because their correlation was not statistically significant. Discussion: We found the frequency of injuries reported in this population to engage in an exercise program, therefore we have no benchmark to compare the incidence. Conclusions: Although exercise was organized and controlled and was given comprehensive care with emphasis on prevention, musculoskeletal lesions.

REFERENCES

1. Gaceta del Senado. Estadísticas de osteoporosis y lesiones musculoesqueléticas. No.152, 2007.Disponible en: http://www.senado.gob.mx/gace.php?sesion=2007/11/08/1&documento=70 (Consultada 8 de noviembre de 2010).

2. Hootman, JM Macera CA , Ainsworth SER y cols. Epidemiologia de las lesiones musculo esqueléticas en adultos sedentarios y activos f ísicamente. Rev. Medicina Deportes Ciencia y Ejercicio. 2002;34 (5): 838 – 44.

3. Rodríguez MC y cols. Lesiones en el Futbol. Colección de Manuales de Prevención. Coordinación de difusión cultural. Dirección General de Publicaciones y fomento editorial. México Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 2003, pp. 60-61.

4. Renstrom P.A.F.H. Prácticas clínicas sobre asistencia y prevención de lesiones deportivas. Barcelona Paidotribo, 1999. p. 132.

5. Tlatempa- Sotelo P. y cols. Lesiones deportivas más comunes. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. 2005. Pág. 1 y 5. Disponible en: www.uaemex.mx/../Lesiones_mas_comunes_en_los_deportistas290405.pdf

6. Solla J, Martinez M. Computerization of soccer injuries: a key for supervision of injuries and elaboration of preventive guidelines. Journal of Sport Science and Medicine 2007;6 (Suppl 10):42-3.

7. Rodríguez LP, Gusí N. Manual de prevención y rehabilitación de lesiones deportivas. Madrid: Síntesis; 2002. p. 31

8. Edward T, Howley B, Don Franks. Manual del Técnico en salud y Fitness. España Paidotribo; 1990 p. 347.

9. Casalis L. El entrenamiento de la flexibilidad. Master de preparación Física en el fútbol. Madrid: Real Federación Española de Fútbol - Universidad de Castilla, La Mancha, 2005. p.86

10. Peterson L, Renstron P. Lesiones deportivas prevención y tratamiento. Barcelona J ims; 1989 p.15.

11. Shier I. Does stretching help prevent injuries En: McAuley D, Best T, editors. Evidence based sport medicine. London: BMJ Books; 2002.

12. Pfeiffer R. Las lesiones deportivas. Barcelona. Paidotribo; España, 2000. p. 16

13. Salter R, Trastornos y lesiones del sistema musculoesqueletico. Ed. Masson, 3a ed. Barcelona. 2003. p 543 – 6