medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Plástica

ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2002, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2002; 12 (2)

Handling of donor sites treated with gauzes with Triticum vulgare versus gauze with petrolatum

Coutiño-Mata JJ, Cuenca-Pardo J, Álvarez-Díaz CJ, Villaseñor FA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 61-64
PDF size: 88.55 Kb.


Key words:

, Donor sites, treatment, fitostimuline.

ABSTRACT

Adequate handling of donor sites is important, because in patients with extensive burns these prove insufficient to provide the necessary skin to cover the injuries and it is necessary to use them more than once. Adequate handling is based on shortening the epithelialization time, avoiding complications such as infection, deepening or anomalous scarring, that delay its use. It has been reported that fitostimuline (Triticum vulgare) exercises on the grafts repairing action tissues. The objective of the present study was to determine the difference in the time of epithelialization of the skin graft donor sites, being treated with fitostimuline impregnated gauze, compared with those treated with gauze with petrolatum. We studied 22 patients with graft donor sites. The same patient served as intervention and control zone, the study zone was covered with gauze impregnated with fitostimuline. The control zone was treated with petrolatum gauze. The epithelialization in the experimental area occurred in an average of 14.18 days while in the control area it was 11.04 days, with a difference of 3.14 days (p ± 0.001). In no case were complications present. In our study the application of fitostimuline, at gauze presentation, did not accelerate the process of re-epithelialization of the donor sites, therefore we consider that it is not a useful product for managing of donor sites.


REFERENCES

  1. Jordan RB, Daher J, Wasil K. Splints and scar management for acute and Reconstructive burn care. Clin Plast Surg 2000; 27: 71-86.

  2. McCarthy J, Still JM, Law EJ. Primary excision of the burn wound. Clin Plast Surg 2000; 27: 23-48.

  3. Salisbury R. Thermal Burns. In: McCarthy J. Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1990; pp.787-813.

  4. Linares HA. Terapia tópica. En: Bendlin Linares: Tratado de Quemaduras. México: Interamericana-McGraw-Hill 1993: 341-353.

  5. Hull BE, Finley RK, Miller SF. Coverage of full thickness burns with bilayered equivalents. Surgery 1990; 107: 496-501.

  6. Mc Kay I, Woodward K, Wood HA. Reconstruction of human skin from glycerol preserved allodermis and cultured keratinocytes sheets. Burns 1994; 20 (suppl): s19-s22.

  7. Achauer BM, Adair SR. Acute and reconstructive management of the burn patient. Clin Plast Surg 2000; 27: 87-96.

  8. Nuñez H, Castro F, Kuri W. Combined use of allograft and autograft epidermal cultures in therapy of burns. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98: 929-939.

  9. Tamariz E, Marsch F et al. Frozen cultured sheets of human epidermal keratinocytes enhance healing of full thickness wounds in mice. Cell Tissue Res 1999; 296: 575-585.

  10. García E, Molina G et al. Estudio comparativo de la acción cicatrizante de las triticum vulgare vs asiaticosido en el tratamiento de las quemaduras de segundo grado. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 95: 1-15.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Plast. 2002;12