medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 2

<< Back

Rev ADM 2012; 69 (2)

Restoring the gingival contour on a ceramic implant restoration in the esthetic zone

Aguado AJA, Aguado AMM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 95-100
PDF size: 158.51 Kb.


Key words:

Implant in the esthetic zone, dentogingival harmony.

ABSTRACT

Replacing a tooth in the esthetic zone represents a major challenge. Multiple factors are involved, such as the management of soft tissue, the biotype, the gingival contour, the degree of bone resorption, the three-dimensional placement of the implant, etc. All of these factors can influence the overall outcome of a person's rehabilitation. Furthermore, given that we are dealing with esthetics, patient expectations tend to be very high. Therefore, it is very important to master every aspect of the process-whether it be during guided bone regeneration, connective tissue grafting, or ensuring satisfactory prosthetic restoration-in order to succeed at the first attempt.
In some cases, we may face situations where results prove unsatisfactory, in which case further treatment will be required in order to restore dentogingival harmony and achieve the desired result.
This paper looks at a case involving a ceramic restoration on a dental implant where the gingival contour was located apically to the adjacent tooth, thus resulting in esthetic disharmony in the area. The problem was solved using a connective tissue graft, customized prosthetic abutment, and a suitable ceramic restoration. The result was a very successful recovery of the lost gingival contour.


REFERENCES

  1. Cardalopoli G, Lekholm U Wennstrom JL Tissue alternations at implant.supported single-tooth replacements: A 1-year prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17: 165-171

  2. Busser D, Martin, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 (suppl). 43-61.

  3. Sadan A, Blatz MB, Bellerino M, Block M Prostthetic desing considerations for anterior single-implant restauration. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:165-175

  4. Huan S. González O.Weisgold A. Lee E. Consideration of implant abutment and crow contour: Critical contour and subcritical contour. The international Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2010;30( 4): 210-335.

  5. Gamborena I, Blatz M. Current clinical and technical protocols for single-tooth immediate implant procedures. Quintessenc of Dental Technology, 2008;31: 49-60.

  6. Matthews D. The pediculated connective tissue graft: a technique for improving unaesthetic implant restoration. Pract Proced Aesther Dent 2002;14(9):719-726.

  7. Khoury F, Happe A. The Palatal Subepithelial connective tissue flap method for soft tissue management to cover maxillary defects: Int. Journal Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2000;15(3):415-418.

  8. Hernandez F, Marti C, Corchero G, Arranz C. Palatal core graft for alveolar reconstruction: A new donor site . Int. Journal of Oral and Maxillofac. Implants. 2005;5: 777-783.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2012;69