medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 07

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2012; 80 (07)

Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser Syndrome. A Case Report and a Review of the Medical Literature on its Treatment

Álvarez NM, Cabrera CE, Hernández EAI, Aguirre OX
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 473-479
PDF size: 834.33 Kb.


Key words:

Rokitansky syndrome, Müllerian malformations, uterine agenesis.

ABSTRACT

The Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome affects 1 out of 4,500 women. It is characterized by the congenital absence of the upper third of the vagina, uterus and tubes; it is usually associated to renal malformations, and patients show normal phenotype and genotype. Age at diagnosis is between 15 and 18. A case is reported and a critical review of the information about the management alternatives of patients with MRKH syndrome available in medical literature is made. The paper is intended to help establish the best criteria and treatment options for a comprehensive therapeutic approach to MRKH patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Laufer MR. Congenital absence of the vagina: in search of the perfect solution. When, and by what technique, should a vagina be created? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2002;14(5):441-444.

  2. Breech LL, Laufer MR. Obstructive anomalies of the female tract. J Reprod Med 1999;44(3):233-240.

  3. Templeman C, Lam AM, Hertweck SP. Surgical management of vaginal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999;54:583-591.

  4. Saad A, Salazar C, Lejtik C, Quintero P, Zafra G. Asociación MURCS: reporte de un caso. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2008;76(6):349-352

  5. Edmonds DK. Congenital malformations of the genital tract. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2000;27(1):49-62.

  6. Freyre Román, E. La Salud del Adolescente: Aspectos Médicos y Psicosociales 2da. edición. Arequipa: Editorial U.N.S.A., 1997.

  7. ACOG Committee Opinion. Número 74. Nonsurgical diagnosis and management of vaginal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100(1):213-216.

  8. Cantini JE, Jaramillo R, Parra SA, Casasbuenas A. Reconstrucción vaginal con técnica modificada de McIndoe. Experiencia de 18 años en el hospital de San José, Bogotá D.C. Colombia. Repert med cir 2005;14:181-191.

  9. Giraldo F, Gaspar D, Gonzalez C, et al. Treatment of vaginal agenesis with vulvoperineal fasciocutaneus flaps. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2004;93:131.

  10. Sánchez J, Pasos I, Celio J, Hernández LE. Corrección quirúrgica de la agenesia vaginal. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2006;74:37-47.

  11. Fedele, L, Bianchi, S, Frontino G, Fontana E. The laparoscopic Vecchietti’s modified technique in Rokitansky syndrome: anatomic, functional, and sexual long-term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 98(4):377.

  12. Página web de Grapsia, grupo de apoyo. http://www.aissg.org/spanish/introduccion.htm




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2012;80