Jiménez CE

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 14-16
PDF size: 39.74 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract

REFERENCES

1. Fletcher DR, Hobbs MST, Tan P, et al. Complications of cholecystectomy: Risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: A population based study. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 449.

2. Mercado MA. Manejo de las estenosis benignas y malignas de la vía biliar. Revista de Gastroenterología de México 2011; 76: 120-125.

3. Wherry DC, Marohn MR, Malanoski MP, et al. An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 145.

4. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1995; 180: 101.

5. Domínguez I, Mercado MA. Manejo postoperatorio en derivación biliodigestiva por lesión iatrógena de vía biliar. Revista de Gastroenterología de México 2008; 73: 21-8.

6. De Pitt HA, et al. Factors influencing outcome in patients with postoperative biliary strictures. Am J Surg 1982; 144: 14.

7. Lillimoe KD, Melton GB, Cameron JL, et al. Postoperative bile duct structures: Management and outcomes in the 1999. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 430.

8. Ciribé J, Ciciliani L y cols. Lesiones mayores de la vía biliar. Análisis de los resultados y del manejo en 42 pacientes. Fundación Dr. J. R. Villavicencio 2005; XII: 127-132.

9. Pottakkat B, Vijayahari R, et al. Factors predicting failure following high bilio-enteric anastomosis for post-cholecystectomy benign biliary strictures. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1389-94.