medigraphic.com
ISSN 1405-8790 (Print)

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Med Fis Rehab 2012; 24 (1)

Characterization of functional hearing impairments in a population sample of Yucatan, Mexico

Estrella CD, López MJA, Zapata PA, Canto HJ

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 10-15
PDF size: 67.16 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To characterize the functional limitations of hearing in the state of Yucatán, México. Material and methods: We analyzed the data base in the SIEA-AYPRODA (Digital Records System in Audition from the Asociación Yucateca Pro Deficiente Auditivo) 2003-2011, which includes data from 1986 to 2011. We created a data base to classify hearing loss, based on criteria of magnitude and laterality were evaluated also the variables of gender, home town, access to healthcare. Results: Of the 2,285 people studied with different levels of hearing loss, the most common is the profound degree of left side in 28.7%. Conclusions: Yucatan is the federal entity with the highest prevalence of hearing impairment, as five of every thousand newborns in Yucatan are deafness in varying degrees, which is the figure of 189 cases per year, contrasted with nearly 3 persons per thousand inhabitants LFA in the country. The records of people with disabilities tend to underestimate the true prevalence of the problem.


REFERENCES

  1. Tucci D, Merson MH, Wilson BS. A summary of the literature on global hearing impairment: current status and priorities. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31(1): 31-41.

  2. Yoshinaga IC, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Languaje of early and later identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998; 102: 1161-71.

  3. CIF: Clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la Salud. Edita: Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, OMS, 2001.

  4. INEGI. XII Censo General de Población y Vivienda, 2000. Base de datos.

  5. INEGI. Encuesta Nacional de la Dinámica Demográfica, 2009. Base de datos.

  6. Benoît J, Lagace´ J, Lavigne A, Boissonneault A, Lavoie C. Auditory processing disorders, verbal disfluency, and learning difficulties: A case study. International Journal of Audiology 2007; 46: 31-38.

  7. Moore JK. Maturation of human auditory cortex: Implications for speech perception. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; Suppl. 189: 7-10.

  8. Reigosa V, Pérez-Abalo MC, Hernández D, De la Osa M, Savío G, Rodríguez M et al. Efectos de la detección temprana sobre el desarrollo psicosocial y lingüístico de los niños con pérdidas auditivas permanentes. Revista CENIC/Ciencias Biológicas 2002; 33: 99-105.

  9. Salesa E. La detección precoz auditiva de los neonatos. Revista de Logopedia, Foniatría y Audiología 2008; 28(3): 135-137.

  10. Smith RG, Van Camp C. Deafness and hereditary hearing loss overview (last revision December 2, 2008). In: Gene review sat Gene Tests: Medical genetics information resource (on line). Copyright. University of Washington, Seattle 1999-2008. Disponible en: www.genetests.org (fecha de consulta 13 mayo 2011).

  11. NelsonHD, Bougatsos C, Nygren P. Universal newborn hearing screening: Systematic review to update the 2001. US preventive services task force recommendation. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 266-76.

  12. Álvarez A, del Castillo I, Villamar M, Aguirre LA, González-Neira A, López-Nevot A et al. High prevalence of the W24X mutation in the gene encoding connexin-26 (GJB2) in Spanish Romani (gypsies) with autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss. Am J Med Genet 2005; 137A: 255-8.

  13. Arnos KS, Welch KO, Tekin M, Norris VW, Blanton SH, Pandya A et al. A comparative analysis of the genetic epidemiology of deafness in the United States in two sets of pedigrees collected more than a century apart. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 83: 200-7.

  14. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing; American Academy of Audiology; American Academy of Pediatrics; American Speech- Language Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs State Health and Welfare Agencies. Year 2000 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 798-81.

  15. World Health Organization. Facts about deafness. www.who.int/pbd, 2005.

  16. Manrique M, Morera C, Moro M. Detección precoz de la hipoacusia infantiles en recién nacidos de alto riesgo. Estudio multicéntrico. An Esp Pediatr 1994; 40 Supl 59: 11-45.

  17. Mehl AL, Thomson V. The Colorado newborn hearing screening project 1992-1999: On the there hold of effective population-based universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics 2002; 109: E7.

  18. Wake M, Poulakis Z, Hughes EK, Carey-Sargeant C, Rickards FW. Hearing impairment: A population study of age at diagnosis, severity and language outcomes at 7-8 years. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90: 238-44.

  19. Kennedy C, McCann D. Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2004; 8: 378-83.

  20. Cruz-Velandia I, Hernández-Jaramillo JH. Magnitud de la discapacidad en Colombia: una aproximación a sus determinantes. Rev Ciencias de la Salud 2008; 623-35. Disponible en: http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=56260303. Consultado el 26 de enero de 2011.

  21. Marco J, Mateu S (coords.). Libro Blanco sobre hipoacusia. Detección precoz de la hipoacusia en recién nacidos. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, 2003.

  22. Willems P. Genetic causes of hearing loss. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1101-9.

  23. Estrella D, Cárdenas M, Zapata A, Canto J, González L, Oaxaca D. Las limitaciones funcionales auditivas en una muestra de población de Yucatán, México. Revista Salud Pública de México 2011: 53(4).

  24. Moores DF. Demographics and sample bias estimates of the deaf and hard of hearing school age population in American Annals of the deaf. 2009; 154(3): 261-262.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com