Teramoto MÓ

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 34-41
PDF size: 225.12 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of the illness by reflux gastroesofágico is high (GERD), affecting to the 20% of the world population. The diagnosis of GERD, generally, is carried out of simple form and without complications. Nevertheless, this study in patients with atypical symptoms that complicate their treatment. That's why, there are necessary diagnostic studies that permit us to apply the technology in adequate form to evaluate each aspect of the GERD, if damage exists and if the symptoms are produced by the acid or not acid reflux. Another aspect to consider, are the advantages and limitations that offer us in the postoperative forecast in the surgical processing. A review of the main processing is carried out that are utilized in the illness by reflux gastroesofágico, such as the pH-metría, the manometría esofágica, the measurement of the impedance, among others.

REFERENCES

1. DeVault KR, Castell DO. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 190-200.

2. Capell MS. Clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Med Clin N Am 2005; 89: 243-91.

3. Vaezi MF. Review article: the role of pH monitoring in extraesophageal gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23: 40-9.

4. Vaezi MF. Review article: esophageal function testing– the old and the new. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 3: 1-13.

5. Hirano I, Richter JE et al. ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 668-85.

6. Lundell L. Surgical therapy of gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 24: 947-59.

7. Tatum RP, Soares R, Figueedo E. High resolution manometry in evaluation of factors responsible for funduplication failure. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 611-9.

8. Chan WW, Haroian LR, Gyawali CP. Value or preoperative esophageal function studies before laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2943-949.

9. Weber C, Davis CS, Fisichella PM. Current application of evolving methodologies in gastroesophageal reflux testing. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 43: 353- 7.

10. - Wileman SM, McCann S, Grant AM et al. Medical vs surgical management for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GORD) in adults. Cochrane Dat System Rev 2010; 3: CD003243.

11. Grübel C, Hiscock R, Hebbard G. Value of spatiotemporal representation of manometric data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 525-30.

12. Bredenoord AJ, Draaisma WA, Weusten BLAM et al. Mechanisms of acid, weakly acidic and gas reflux after anti-reflux surgery. Gut 2008; 57: 161-6.

13. Scheffer RCH, Samsom M, Hebbard GS et al. Effect of partial (Belsey Mark IV) and complete (Nissen) funduplication on proximal gastric function and esophagogastric junction dynamics. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 479-87.

14. Scheffer RCH, Samsom M, Haverkamp A et al. Impaired bolus transit across the esophagogastric junction in postfundoplication dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1677-84.

15. Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, Ghosh SK et al. Acidity surrounding the squamocolumnar junction in GERD patients: «acid pocket» versus «acid film». Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2633-41.

16. Pandolfino JE, Gosh SK, Rice J et al. Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 27-37.

17. Kahrilas PJ, Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE. Esophageal motility disorders in terms of pressure topography. The Chicago classification. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 42: 627-35.

18. Pandolfino JE, Kim H, Ghosh SK et al. High-resolution manometry of the EGJ: an analysis of crural diaphragm function in GERD. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1056-63.

19. Tatum RP, Soares RV, Figueredo E et al. High-resolution manometry in evaluation of factors responsible for funduplication failure. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 210: 611-9.

20. Soudagard AS, Sayuk GS, Gyawali CP. Learners favor high resolution esophageal manometry with better diagnostic accuracy over conventional line tracings. Gut 2011; Epub ahead of print.

21. Hershcovici T, Mashimo H, Fass R. The lower esophageal sphincter. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 23: 819-30.

22. Rydberg L, Ruth M, Abrahamsson H et al. Tailoring antireflux surgery: A randomized clinical trial. World J Surg 1999; 23: 612-8.

23. Akyüz F, Arici S, Ermispf et al. Utility of esophageal manometry and pH-metry in gastroesophageal reflux disease before surgery. Turk J Gastroenterol 2009; 20: 261-5.