medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Mediciego

ISSN 1029-3035 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Mediciego 2012; 18 (2)

Change frequency of serum and blood equipment, a review

López RJR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 37
Page:
PDF size: 194.67 Kb.


Key words:

infusions, intravenous, cross infection catheter-related infections, evidence-based nursing.

ABSTRACT

Serum and blood equipment are essential in intravenous therapy, allowing the management of fluid variable volumes through an intravascular route previously enabled in the patient. The time that equipment can remain in use without risk of infection has varied from the seventies, thanks to the contribution of numerous investigations. Intervals of replacement from 24 up to 168 hours have been proposed. Although the topic has been updated in guides adopted globally, not always corresponds to what has been published in manuals and other sources. A review was carried out to identify relevant aspects about the optimum interval for replacement of intravenous administration equipment used in hospital services, in contrast to what has been published in our basic texts of nursing. A search detailed in Internet took place, identifying 28 relevant periodic documents. It settles like optimal interval for the replacement of the equipment the 96 hours for infusions that do not contain lipids. For parenteral lipids the equipment must be replaced with each administered bottle, unless the additional units are instilled of consecutive way, always within the 24 hours. In relation to the transfusion equipment, it must be changed each 4 units or every 12 hours.


REFERENCES

  1. Younger G, Khan M. Setting up and priming an intravenous infusion. Nurs Stand [Internet]. 2008 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 22(40): 40-4. Disponible en: http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=20414125

  2. Maki DG, Anderson RL, Shulman JA. In-use contamination of intravenous infusion fluid. Appl Microbiol. 1974; 28(5): 778-84.

  3. Mackel DC, Maki DG, Anderson RL, Rhame FS, Bennett JV. Nationwide epidemic of septicemia caused by contaminated intravenous products: mechanisms of intrinsic contamination. J Clin Microbiol. 1975; 2(6): 486-97.

  4. Buxton AE, Highsmith AK, Garner JS, West M, Stamm WE, Dixon RE, et al. Contamination of intravenous infusion fluid: effects of changing administration sets. Ann Intern Med. 1979; 90:764-8.

  5. Band JD, Maki DG. Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24-hour intervals. Ann Intern Med. 1979; 91:173-8.

  6. Gorbea HF, Snydman DR, Delaney A, Stockman J, Martin WJ. Intravenous tubing with burettes can be safely changed at 48-hour intervals. JAMA [Internet]. 1984 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 251:2112-5. Disponible en: http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/251/16/2112.short

  7. Maki DG. Botticelli JT, LeRoy ML, Thielke TS. Prospective study of replacing administration sets for intravenous therapy at 48 vs 72 hour intervals. 72 hours is safe and cost-effective. JAMA [Internet]. 1987 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 258: 1777-81. Disponible en: http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/258/13/1777.short

  8. Matlow AG, Kitai I, Kirpalani H, Chapman NH, Corey M, Perlman M, et al. A randomized trial of 72- versus 24-hour intravenous tubing set changes in newborns receiving lipid therapy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]. 1999 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 20:487-93. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/501657

  9. Pearson ML. Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Contr. 1996; 24:262–77.

  10. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL, Heard SO, Maki DG, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. MMWR [Internet]. 2002 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 51(No. RR-10): 1-29. Disponible en: http://aappolicyaappublications.awaith.info/cgi/content/abstract/pediatrics;110/5/e51

  11. Mirtallo J, Canada T, Johnson D, Kumpf V, Petersen C, Sacks G, et al. Safe practices for parenteral nutrition. J Parenter Enteral Nutr [Internet]. 2004 [citado 16 Mar 2011]; 28(6): S39-S70. Disponible en: http://www.nutritioncare.org/assets/0/48/100/168/172/9EA75C7D-B801-44CB-89BC-F5B0290BE699.pdf

  12. Gillies D, O’Riordan L, Wallen M, Rankin K, Morrison A, Nagy S. Timing of intravenous administration set changes: a systematic review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]. 2004 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 25(3): 250-40. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/502385

  13. Gillies D, Wallen MM, Morrison AL, Rankin K, Nagy SA, O’Riordan E. Optimal timing for intravenous administration set replacement. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2005 [citado 16 Mar 2011]. Issue 4. Art. No.: CD003588. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003588.pub2. Disponible en: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003588.pub2/pdf/standard

  14. Walz JM, Memtsoudis SG, Heard SO. Prevention of central venous catheter bloodstream infections. J Intens Care Med [Internet]. 2010 [citado 16 Mar 2011]; 25(3): 131-8. Disponible en: http://jic.sagepub.com/content/25/3/131.short

  15. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, Dellinger EP, Garland J, Heard SO, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2011 [citado 19 Ene 2012]; 52(9):e162–e193. Disponible en: http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/52/9/e162.short

  16. Raad I, Hanna HA, Awad A, Alrahwan A, Bivins C, Khan A, et al. Optimal frequency of changing intravenous administration sets: is it safe to prolong use beyond 7 2 hours? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]. 2001 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 22(3):136-9. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/501879

  17. Muder RR. Frequency of intravenous administration set changes and bacteremia: defining the risk. Infection Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]. 2001 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 22(3): 134-5. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/501878

  18. Rickard CM, Lipman J, Courtney M, Siversen R, Daley P. Routine changing of intravenous administration sets does not reduce colonization or infection in central venous catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol [Internet]. 2004 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 25:650-5. Disponible en: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/502456

  19. Rickard CM, Wallis SC, Courtney M, Lipman J, Daley PJP. Intravascular administration sets are accurate and in appropriate condition after 7 days of continuous use: an in vitro study. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2002 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 37(4): 330-7. Disponible en: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02099.x/full

  20. Simon A, Fleischhack G, Wiszniewsky G, Hasan C, Bode U, Kramer M H. Influence of prolonged use of intravenous administration sets in paediatric cancer patients on CVAD-related bloodstream infection rates and hospital resources. Infection [Internet]. 2006 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 34(5): 258–63. http://www.springerlink.com/index/C2048786425MN891.pdf

  21. Brenner F P, Bugedo TG, Calleja RD, Del Valle MG, Fica CA, Gómez ME, et al. Prevención de infecciones asociadas a catéteres vasculares centrales. Rev Chil Infect [Internet]. 2003 [citado [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 20(1): 51-69. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/rci/v20n1/art07.pdf

  22. Blest A, Roberts M, Murdock J, Watson D, Brunskill S. How often should a red blood cell administration set be changed while a patient is being transfused? A commentary and review of the literature. Transfus Med. 2008; 18, 121–133.

  23. Luskin RL, Weinstein RA, Nathan C, Chamberlin WH, Kabins SA. Extended use of disposable pressure transducers. A bacteriologic evaluation. JAMA [Internet]. 1986 [citado 27 Ene 2011]; 255:916-20. Disponible en: http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/255/7/916.short

  24. Webster J, Osborne S, Rickard C, Hall J. Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD007798. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007798.pub2.

  25. Castro Torres AM. Manual de procedimientos de enfermería. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2002.

  26. Castro López FW, Urbina Laza O. Manual de enfermería en neonatología. La Habana: ECIMED; 2007.

  27. Castro López FW. Atención de enfermería en el recién nacido. En: Socarrás Ibáñez N, Pérez Medina M, Leonard Castillo Á, Alfonso Arenas N, Suárez Fuentes RR, Lemus Bocalandro O, et al. Enfermería ginecoobtétrica. La Habana: ECIMED; 2009. p. 219-313.

  28. Castro López FW. Cuidados de enfermería en la nutrición. En: Valdés Armenteros, Reina. Nutrición del recién nacido. La Habana: ECIMED; 2010. p. 159-69.

  29. Castro López F. Beneficios del catéter epicutáneo en el recién nacido. Rev Cubana Enferm 2004 [citado 14 mar 2011]; 20(2): [aprox. 9 p.]. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/enf/vol20_2_04/enf06204.htm

  30. Apao Díaz J. Aspectos epidemiológicos en las unidades de urgencias y de atención al grave. En: León Román CA, López Suárez D, Baltar Charnicharo LR, Apao Díaz J, Pérez Ley A, Díaz Díaz LM et al. Enfermería en urgencias I. La Habana: ECIMED; 2008. p. 144-82.

  31. Ballesteros Ramos A, Blanco Iglesias F, González C. Asistencia de enfermería en el apoyo nutricional a pacientes graves. En: León Román CA, Suárez López D, Barrera Sotolongo J, Riscart Rivero A, Ballestero Ramos A, Blanco Iglesias F, et al. Enfermería en urgencias II. La Habana: ECIMED; 2008. p. 729-60.

  32. Negrín Villavicencio JA, Rodríguez González A, Márquez Remon V, Mora Blanco S. Abordaje de los vasos sanguíneos o abordaje vascular. En: Negrín Villavicencio JA. Texto para la especialización de enfermería en cuidados intensivos. La Habana: Editorial Pueblo y Educación; 1990. p. 166-92.

  33. Labeau S, Vereecke A, Vandijck DM, Claes B, Blot SI. Critical care nurses’ knowledge of evidence-based guidelines for preventing infections associated with central venous catheters: an evaluation questionnaire. Am J Crit Care [Internet]. 2008 [citado 10 Nov 2011]; 17(1): 65-71. Disponible en: http://ajcc.aacnjournals.org/content/16/4/371.short

  34. Labeau SO, Vandijck DM, Rello J, Adam S, Rosa A, Wenisch C, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for preventing central venous catheter-related infection: Results of a knowledge test among 3405 European intensive care nurses. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2009 [citado 10 Nov 2011]; 37(1): 320-23. Disponible en: http://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Abstract/2009/01000/Centers_for_Disease_Control_and_Prevention.44.aspx

  35. Kozier B, Erb G. Fundamentals of nursing. Concepts and procedures. Third ed. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1987.

  36. Rickard CM, Vannapraseuth B, McGrail MR, Keene LJ, Rambaldo S, Smith CA, et al. The relationship between intravenous infusate colonisation and fluid container hang time. J Clin Nurs [Internet]. 2009 [citado 10 Nov 2011]; 18: 3022–8. Disponible en: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02870.x/full

  37. Turco SJ. Mezclas intravenosas. En: Farmacia práctica de Remington. La Habana: ECIMED; 2006. p. 2375-93.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Mediciego. 2012;18