medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2011; 49 (S1)

The quality of cancer registry. From a methodology approach

Fajardo-Gutiérrez A, González-Miranda G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 39-42
PDF size: 155.70 Kb.


Key words:

Registries, diseases registries, neoplasms.

ABSTRACT

Since 1996 at the unit of epidemiological research of the “Hospital de Pediatría en Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI” a cancer registry in children has been done. This registry has been a pioneer with special features like be only in child population attended in Mexico City. The following paper describes the main characteristics of the registry, the strategy used to obtain the data, the quality criterion applied for selecting data like timeliness, validated and complete. A longitudinal and prolective data was obtained. There was a training period for obtaining and register the data. The data was obtained from children with neoplasm attended at the mentioned hospital above. The diagnosis of a solid neoplasm was established by histology and marrow aspirated studies. The population studied was children (0-14 years). It was calculated the incidence (per 1000 000 children/year) by age, sex, diagnosis and place of residence. The trend was evaluated by estimating the average annual percent of change.


REFERENCES

  1. National Cancer Institute. SEER Training Modules. Cancer registry. Disponible en http://training.seer.cancer.gov/ registration/registry/

  2. Coordinación de Atención Médica. Estructura de población adscrita a médico familiar, 1996-2007. México: IMSS; 2008.

  3. Percy C, Van Holten V, Muir C, editores. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. Second edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990.

  4. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, Shanmugaratnam K, Sobin L, Parkin DM, Whelan S. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. Third edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.

  5. Kramárová E, Stiller CA, Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Draper GJ, Michaelis J, Neglia J, Qureshi S. Child-Check program. En: International Classification of Childhood Cancer. IARC Technical Report no. 29. Lyon: IARC; 1996. p. 43-47.

  6. Stelearova-Foucher E, Stiller Ch, Lacour B, Kaatsch P. International classification of childhood cancer. Third edition. Cancer 2005;103:1457-1467.

  7. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, editores: AJCC Staging Manual. Sixth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997.

  8. Children’s Oncology Group Pediatric Staging Guide Disponible en http://www.childrensoncologygroup.org

  9. Smith PG. Comparison between registries: age-standarized rates. En: Parkin DM, Muir CS, Whelan SL, Gao YT, Ferlay J, Powell J, editores. Cancer incidence in five continents. France, Lyon: IARC WHO. Scientific Publication No. 120, 192: Vol. 6:865-870.

  10. U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2006 Incidence and Mortality Webbased Report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute; 2010. Disponible en www.cdc.gov/uscs

  11. Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 2000;19(3):335-351.

  12. National Cancer Institute. Joinpoint regression analysis of cancer trends [Actualización abril 12, 2011]. Disponible en http://srab.cancer.gov/joinpoint/aapc.html




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2011;49