2012, Number 3
<< Back Next >>
Cir Gen 2012; 34 (3)
Quality of life in patients subjected to inguinal hernioplasty assessed through the short form 36 (SF-36)
Valdovinos-González CA, Zaldívar-Ramírez FR, Díaz-Contreras-Piedras C, Athié-Gutiérrez C
Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 169-173
PDF size: 121.77 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To demonstrate self-perception of patients regarding their quality of life before and after inguinal plasty in a third level health care hospital of the health sector, by means of the SF-36 health questionnaire.
Setting: Hospital General de México, Mexico City.
Design: Prospective, longitudinal, comparative and observational study.
Statistical analysis: Central tendency measures, Wilcoxon ranks tests and general linear model.
Patients and methods: We included 67 patients, in whom inguinal plasty was performed with the Lichtenstein technique between March 1
st and May 31
st 2012, applying the SF-36 questionnaire one day before and 3 months after surgery.
Results: The group consisted of 64 men and 3 women, average age of 44.73 (SD ± 13.2). Regardless of the type of hernia (Nythus classification), all patients perceived a significant improvement in their quality of life (p ‹0.05). Patients with less than 1 year with symptoms caused by the inguinal hernia did not perceive an improvement in the quality of life (p ›0.05). Those cases with more than 1 year with symptoms perceived a significant improvement in their quality of life (p ‹0.05).
Conclusions: Those patients with more than one year of evolution with the inguinal hernia were the ones to perceive the best improvement in their quality of life (SF-36) after surgery.
REFERENCES
Jenkins JT, O’Dwyer PJ. Inguinal hernias. BMJ 2008; 336: 269-272.
McVay CB. Inguinal hernioplasty. Common mistakes and pitfalls. Surg Clin North Am 1966; 46: 1089-1100.
Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, Poucher J, Hennet H, Habib E, et al. Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicenter controlled trial in 1578 patients. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 719-727.
Berney CR. Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic (TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3350-3351.
Bittner R, Schwarz J. Inguinal hernia repair: current surgical techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012; 397: 271-282.
Nordin P, Bartelmess P, Jansson C, Svensson C, Edlund G. Randomized trial of Lichtenstein versus Shouldice hernia repair in general surgical practice. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 45-49.
Beets GL. Randomized clinical trial on chronic pain after the transinguinal preperitoneal technique compared with Lichtenstein’s method for inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1373.
Prieto-Díaz-Chávez E, Medina-Chávez JL, Anaya-Prado R. A cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free versus shouldice inguinal hernia repair: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Hernia 2009; 13: 233-238.
O’Reilly EA, Burke JP, O’Connell PR. A meta-analysis of surgical morbidity and recurrence after laparoscopic and open repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 846-853.
Zendejas B, Ramirez T, Jones T, Kuchena A, Martineza J, Ali SM, et al. Trends in the utilization of inguinal hernia repair techniques: a population-based study. Am J Surg 2012; 203: 313-317.
Robbins AW, Rutkow IM. Mesh plug repair and groin hernia surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1998; 78: 1007-1023.
Powell R, Johnston M, Smith WC, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski Z, et al. Psychological risk factors for chronic post-surgical pain after inguinal hernia repair surgery: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Pain 2012; 16; 600-610.
Reinpold WM, Nehls J, Eggert A. Nerve management and chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective two phase study. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 163-168.
Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanelli G, Izard G, Kehlet H, Wijsmuller AR, et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia 2011; 15: 239-249.
Tolver MA, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Early pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A qualitative systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56: 549-557.
Sarosi G, Wei Y, Gibbs J, Reda D, McCarthy M, Fitzgibbons RJ, et al, A clinician’s guide to patient selection for watchful waiting management of inguinal hernia. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 605-610.
Turaga K, Fitzgibbons RJ, Puri V. Inguinal hernias: should we repair? Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88: 127-138.
Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc) 1995; 104: 771-776.
Nikkolo C, Lepner U, Murruste M, Vaasna T, Seepter H, Tikk T. Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernioplasty. Hernia 2010; 14: 253-258.
Abbas AE, Abd Ellatif ME, Noaman N, Negm A, El-Morsy G, Amin M, et al. Patient-perspective quality of life after laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a controlled randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2465-2470.
Holzheimer RG. First results of Lichtenstein hernia repair with Ultrapro-mesh as cost saving procedure--quality control combined with a modified quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) in a series of ambulatory operated patients. Eur J Med Res 2004; 9: 323-327.
Yener O, Aksoy F, Güzel P, Bölük S, Dağ E, Atak T. Long-term quality of life after hernioplasty using a Prolene hernia system in adult inguinal hernia. Hernia 2012; 16: 29-32.
Butte BJM, León GF, Van Sunt JDN, Hevia SC, Zuñiga AA, Ibañez Al, et al. Hernioplastía inguinal con técnica Prolene hernia system. Evaluación de los resultados a largo plazo. Rev Chil Cir 2007; 59: 421-441.
Pulido-Cejudo A, Carrillo-Ruiz JD, Jalife-Montaño A, Zaldívar-Ramírez FR, Hurtado-López LM. Inguinodinia en postoperados de plastía inguinal con técnica de Lichtenstein con resección versus preservación del nervio ilioinguinal ipsilateral. Cir Gen 2012; 34: 18-24.
Turaga K, Fitzgibbons RJ, Puri V. Hernias inguinales: ¿se deben reparar? Surg Clin N Am 2008; 88: 127-138.