Contreras MI, Contreras MG, Bez L, de Souza MR, Maziero VCÁ

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 117-122
PDF size: 748.24 Kb.

ABSTRACT

In the field of implantology, surgical procedures have been performed with the assistance of computerized tomographies associated to the CAD/CAM technology. Digital images thus obtained, allow professionals to perform virtual surgical planning in specific software. This results in a prototyped guide which enables surgical procedures to be achieved in lesser clinical time, without flaps or sutures, yielding excellent post-operative results. The aim of the present article was to present the sequence of a clinical case in which implants were placed using guided surgery.

REFERENCES

1. van Steenberghe D, Naert I, Andersson M, Brajnovic I, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Suetens P. A custom template and definitive prosthesis allowing immediate implant in the maxilla: a clinical report. Int J of Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 663-667.

2. Di Giacomo GA, Cury PR, de Araújo NS, Sendyk WR, Sendyk CL. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. Journal of Periodontology 2005; 76: 503-507.

3. Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery. A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21:305-13.

4. Ersoy AE, Turkyilmaz I, Ozan O, McGlumphy EA. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants. Journal of Periodontology 2008; 79: 1339-1345.

5. Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, Eggers G. Accuracy of image-guided implantology. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2005; 16: 495-501.

6. Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2009; 20: 73-86.

7. Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imagining and collaborative accountability. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 214-221.

8. Nikzad S, Azari A. A novel stereolithographic surgical guide template for planning treatment involving a mandibular dental implant. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66: 1446-1454.

9. Ewers R, Schicho K, Truppe M, Reichwein A, Figl M, Wagner A. Computer-aided navigation in dental implantology: 7 years of clinical experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62: 329-334.

10. Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. Surgical planning and prosthesis construction using computed tomography, CAD/CAM technology and the internet from immediate loading of dental implants. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006; 18: 312-323.

11. Jabero M, Sarment DP. Advanced surgical guidance technology: a review. Implant Dent 2006; 15 (2): 135-142.

12. Assche NV, Quirynen M. Tolerance within a surgical guide. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2010; 21: 455-458.

13. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, Wismeijer D, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 92-109.

14. Holst S, Blatz MB, Wichmann M, Eitner S. Clinical application of surgery fixation screws in implants prosthodontics. Part III. Indexing implant position. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2004; 92: 496-499.