medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Salud Pública

ISSN 1561-3127 (Electronic)
ISSN 0864-3466 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Salud Pública 2013; 39 (1)

Study of risks and damages found in eucaliptus nursery plant workers

Pisani A, de Souza VR, Laborde A, Tomasina F
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 96-106
PDF size: 138.93 Kb.


Key words:

nursery, risk factors, risk map.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: this paper was intended to investigate the risk factors and the health/ disease status of eucalyptus nursery plant workers.
Methods: an observational, cross-sectional epidemiological study was conducted in 84 workers employed in a eucalyptus nursery plant. The methodology included interviews to qualified informants of the company and to workers were made, paying visits to nurseries where direct observation was carried out based on the classification of risk factors of the Italian workers´ model, the quantitative measurement of light, noise and temperature; use of an ergonomic method for assessing exposure to physical stress, filming and image recording as well as implementation of an occupational medical history protocol. Data was entered into a statistical database for analysis.
Results: with the information obtained, a risk map was made highlighting the risk factors to which most workers are exposed and the health hazards that are most frequently found. Among these risk factors are those derived from the microenvironment such as temperature, lighting, exposure to sunlight, physical workload (postures, repetitive movements). The most common health problems were musculoskeletal disorders, cutaneous and ophthalmological problems.
Conclusions: a surveillance plan for health monitoring was organized on the basis of the risk and hazard profile found in this study.


REFERENCES

  1. Mc Atamney L, Corlett. RULA: survey method for the investigation of work related uper Limb Disorders. Applied Ergonomics. 1993;(24):9199.

  2. Manero A R, Soto L, Rodríguez T. Un modelo simple para la evaluación integral del riesgo a lesiones músculo-esqueléticas (MODSI). MAPFRE Med. 2005;16(2):86- 94.

  3. Anuario Estadístico Agropecuario . Uruguay: Ministerio de Ganadería, Agricultura y Pesca (MGAP); 2011 [citado 29 Dic 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.mgap.gub.uy/portal/hgxpp001.aspx

  4. Ordenanza 145/2010. Vigilancia sanitaria de trabajadores expuestos a factores de riesgo laborales. 2010 [citado 29 Dic 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.msp.gub.uy

  5. Puntariæ D, Kos A, Smit Z, Zeciæ Z, Sega K, Beljo-Luciæ R, et al. Wood dust exposure in wood industry and forestry. Coll Antropol. 2005;29(1):207-11.

  6. Lilley R, Feyer AM, Kirk P, Gander P. A survey of forest workers in New Zealand. Do hours of work, rest, and recovery play a role in accidents and injury? J Safety Res. 2002;33(1):53-71.

  7. Miranda H, Viikari-Juntura E, Martikainen R, Takala EP, Riihimäki H. Physical exercise and musculoskeletal pain among forest industry workers. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001;11(4):239-46.

  8. Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos, Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades, Instituto Nacional de Salud y Seguridad Ocupacional. Soluciones simples: ergonomía para trabajadores agrícolas. Uruguay: CDC- NIOSH Publicación; 2001 [citado 29 Dic 2011]. Disponible en: http://www.cdc.gov/spanish/niosh/docs/01-111pd-sp.html

  9. US-EPA. Environmental Protection Agency. Chemicals Evaluated for Carcinogenic Potential. 1997 [citado 29 Dic 2011]. Disponible en: http://npic.orst.edu/chemicals_evaluated.pdf

  10. ESIS. European chemical Substances Information System.CLP/GHS (Classification, Labelling and Packaging of substances and mixtures); CLP implements the Globally harmonised System (GHS), Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. 2008 [citado 29 Dic 2011]. Disponible en: http://esis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/

  11. World Health Organization. The WHO recommended classification of Pesticides by Hazard and Guidelines to Classification. Geneva: WHO; 2009.

  12. Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB). Uruguay: HSDB; 2001[citado 29 Dic 2011]. Disponible en: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Salud Pública. 2013;39