medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Investigación Clínica

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Invest Clin 2011; 63 (3)

Weight gain and metabolic complications in preterm infants with nutritional support

Monroy-Torres R, Macías AE, Ponce-de-León S, Barbosa-Sabanero G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 37
Page: 244-252
PDF size: 102.87 Kb.


Key words:

Hospital practices, Hyperglycemia, Weight gain, Preterm infant, Energy intake.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To analyze the weight gain and to describe the metabolic complications in preterm newborns with nutritional support (NS) and to describe nutritional practices in the first month of hospitalization for 52 preterm newborns. Material and methods. Descriptive and prospective study of preterm infants (30-36 gestational weeks), with birth weight › 1 kg, hospital stay ›12 days, without respiratory support or complications, conducted at a public hospital in Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico from January to November 2006. Weight, serum glucose, insulin, cholesterol, triglycerides, gamma-glutamyltransferase, creatinine, urea nitrogen, type of NS (parenteral PN, enteral EN, mixed MN), energy content, and macronutrient intake were measured weekly. To obtain representative data, nutritional practices were not altered by the study protocol. One way ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests were used in data analyses. Results. Overall, 52 newborns were included, averaging 33 gestational weeks and 1,590 g of weight. The NS was started by the fourth day on average. Parenteral nutrition was the most frequent NS during the first 2 weeks (75%). Energy and macronutrient supply was 50% less than the recommended. Weight gain ranged from -100 to 130 g/week. Parenteral nutrition showed better weekly weight gain, followed by EN. The metabolic complication rate per person-day was greater for MN (0.56), than for EN (0.16) or PN (0.09). Routine surveillance of weight and metabolic complications was deficient. Conclusions. Late onset of NS, insufficient energy supply, and deficient surveillance were obstacles to weight gain and to prevent the metabolic complications in these newborns.


REFERENCES

  1. Puntis JWL. Nutritional support in the premature newborn. Postgraduate Med J 2006; 82(965): 192-8.

  2. Horbar JD, Plsek PE, Leahy K. NIC/Q 2000: Establishing habits for improvement in neonatal intensive care units. Pediat 2003; 111(Suppl.): e397-e410.

  3. Ward RM, Beachy JC. Neonatal complications following preterm birth. BJOG 2003; 110 (Suppl. 20): 8-16.

  4. Athié AAJ. NPT vs. NET. Nutr Clin 2000; 3: 24-8.

  5. Ehrenkranz RA, Younes N, Lemons J. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birthweight infants. Pediat 1999; 104: 280-9.

  6. Slone S. Nutritional support of the critically ill and injured patient. Crit Care Clin 2004; 20: 135-57.

  7. Udaeta-Mora E, Martínez-De-Castro GT, Pérez-Marín P, Carmona- Rodríguez M. Enteral nutrition in the preterm and term newborn with low birth weight. Gac Med Mex 2005; 141(4): 283-90.

  8. Ahmed M, Irwin S, Tuthill DP. Education and evidence are needed to improve neonatal parenteral nutrition practice. JPEN 2004; 28(3): 176-9.

  9. McClure RJ, Newell S. Randomized controlled study of clinical outcome following trophic feeding. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2000; 82: F29-F33.

  10. Bitrich S, Philipona C, Hammon HM, Romé V. Preterm as compared with full-term neonatal calves is characterized by morphological and functional immaturity of the small intestine. J Diary Sci 2004; 87: 1786-95.

  11. Hack M, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Rahman M, Cuttler L, Borawski E. Growth of very low birth infants to age 20 years. Pediatrics 2003; 112(1): e30-e37.

  12. Barker DJ, Hales CN, Fall CH, Osmond C, Phipps K, Clark PM. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidemia (X syndrome): relation to reduced fetal growth. Diabetol 1993; 36: 62-7.

  13. Nicolini U, Hubinont C, Santolaya J, Fisk NM, Rodeck CH. Effects of fetal intravenous glucose challenge in normal and growth retarded fetuses. Horm Metab Res 1990; 22: 426-30.

  14. Premji SS. Enteral feeding for high risk neonates: A digest for nurses into putative risk and benefits to ensure safe and comfortable care. J Perinatol Neo Nur 2005; 19(1): 59-71.

  15. Nevin-Folino N. Nutrition assessment of premature infants. In: Pediatric Manual of Clinical Dietetics. 2nd ed. USA: American Diet Association; 2003, p. 127-43.

  16. Serrano ME, Mannick EE. Enteral feeding. Pediatr Rev 2004; 25(6): 213-9.

  17. Pérez JL, Martínez PD, López J, Ibarra I, Pujol M. Artificial nutrition in pediatric intensive care units. An Pediatr 2005; 62(2): 105-12.

  18. Glantz SA. Primer of Biostatistics 4.0. McGraw-Hill; 1996.

  19. Moyer-Mileur LJ. Anthropometric and laboratory assessment of very low birth weight infants: the most helpful measurements and why. Semin Perinatol 2007; 31: 96-103.

  20. Sparks JW. Intrauterine growth and nutrition. In: Fetal and neonatal physiology. Polin and Fox. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Saunders Company; 1992: 179-97.

  21. Villar J, De Onis M, Kestler E, Bolaños F, Cerezo R, Bernedes H. The differential neonatal morbidity of the intrauterine growth retardation syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 151-7.

  22. Philip AG. Immediate feeding of premature newborns. Pediatr Rev 2004; 25(3): 115-8.

  23. Perlman M, Kirpalani H. Apendix 7: Normal values. In: Resident’s handbook of neonatology. Toronto, Canada: Mosby; 1992, p. 274-83.

  24. Szklo M, Nieto FJ. Measuring disease occurrence. In: Epidemiology. Beyond the basics. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers; 2000, p. 55-89.

  25. Carreño DW. Practical handbook of parenteral nutrition in pediatrics. Colombia: Panamericana; 2002.

  26. Donovan R, Puppala B, Angst D, Coyle BW. Outcomes of early nutrition support in extremely low-birth-weight infants. Nut Clin Practice 2006; 21(4): 395-400.

  27. Dunn I, Hulman S, Weiner J, Kliegman R. Beneficial effects of early enteral feeding on neonatal gastrointestinal function: Preliminary report of a randomized trial. J Pediatr 1988; 112: 622-29.

  28. Rigo J, Santierre J. Nutritional needs for premature infants: current issues. J Pediatr 2006: S80-S88.

  29. Ruy-Díaz-Reynoso JA. Risk-benefit of enteral nutrition: a clinical and scientific vision. Nutr Clin 1998; 1(Suppl. 1): 18-20.

  30. Gura KM. Parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis in the pediatric patient: a review of preventive measures and therapeutic interventions. Parenteral Nutr Assoc 1996; 1(2): 99-107.

  31. Zambrano E, El-Hennawy M, Ehrenkranz RA, ZeltermanD, Reyes-Mugica M. Total parenteral nutrition induced liver pathology: an autopsy series of 24 newborn cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol 2004; 7(5): 425-32.

  32. Zarate P, Valente A, Mendicoa L, Viveros F. Abnormalities in tests of hepatic function in children with parenteral nutrition. Nutr Clin 1998; 1(3): 128-31.

  33. Patole S. Strategies for prevention of feed intolerance in preterm neonates: a systematic review. J Mater Fetal Neonatal Med 2005; 18(1): 67-76.

  34. Hofman PL, Regan F, Jackson WE, Jefferies C, Knight DB, Robinson EM, Cutfield WS. Premature birth and later insulin resistance. N Engl J Med 2004; 351(21): 2179-86.

  35. Adamkin DH. Nutritional management of the very low birthweight newborns. Neo Reviews 2006; 7(12): 602-7.

  36. Loomis T, Merrit S, Khalak R. Survey of Primary Care Physicians. Pediatrics 2010; 4(125): e891-e898.

  37. Grover A, Khashu M, Mukherjee A, Kairamkonda V. Iatrogenic malnutrition in neonatal intensive care units: Urgent need to modify practice. Neo Reviews 2007; 8: 485-90.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Invest Clin. 2011;63