medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2013; 27 (1)

Incidence and effect of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty

García-Juárez JD, Bravo-Bernabé PA, García-Hernández A, Jiménez-Cabuto CI, García-Rosas MS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 43-46
PDF size: 41.80 Kb.


Key words:

arthroplasty, hip, discrepancy length leg, postoperative complications.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In coxarthrosis pain relief and the restoration of function including leg length are achieved with total hip arthroplasty. Sometimes achieving stability makes it impossible to achieve equal leg length. Objective: To determine the incidence of pelvic limb length discrepancy, its effect on function and its emotional effect in a group of patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty. Material and methods: A total of 252 patients with a diagnosis of grade IV coxarthrosis were assessed. They underwent unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty with a direct lateral approach; 190 were uncemented and 162 hybrid. Limb length was measured from the anterosuperior iliac crest to the medial malleolus of both legs. Patients were divided into four groups depending on leg length discrepancy: A) equal length; B) less than 10 mm; C) more than 10 mm, and D) more than 20 mm. Results: A total of 252 arthroplasties were performed in 252 patients; 194 females (76.98%) and 58 males (23.01%). In 115 patients (45.63%) had a discrepancy ‹ 10 mm; 71 patients (28.17%) › 10 mm; 60 patients (23.80%) did not have length discrepancy, and six patients had › 20 mm of discrepancy with lengthening of the operated limb. Conclusions: Length discrepancy of the operated limb is reported in the literature. It is a common outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty, and is usually ‹ 10 mm, as reported in world literature.


REFERENCES

  1. Kaczmarek W, Pietrzak K, Pucher A: Possibilities of leg length equalization in total hip replacement. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol 2011; 76(3): 169-74.

  2. Plaass C, Clauss M, Ochsner PE, Ilchmann T: Influence of leg length discrepancy on clinical results after total hip arthroplasty--a prospective clinical trial. Hip Int 2011; 21(4): 441-9.

  3. Kjellberg M, Al-Amiry B, Englund E, Sjödén GO, Sayed-Noor AS: Measurement of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. The reliability of a plain radiographic method compared to CT-scanogram. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 41(2): 187-91.

  4. Gurney B, Mermier C, Robergs R: Effects of limb-length discrepancy on gait economy and lower-extremity muscle activity in older adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83: 907-15.

  5. Shao S, Fu K, Chen Y, Gao M, Ling S: Clinical research of accurate limb length equalization in total hip arthroplasty. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2010; 24(5): 541-3.

  6. Zhongguo G: Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: impacts on postoperative function and patients’ satisfaction. Arthroplasty 2009; 22(12): 906-8.

  7. Jibodh SR, Kandil AO, Malchau H: Do commonly reported outcome masures reflect patient satisfaction after revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25(1): 41-5.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2013 Ene-Feb;27