Sánchez FP

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 9-11
PDF size: 42.80 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract

REFERENCES

1. Massarwech N, Devlin A, Gaston R, Broeckel JA, Flum D. Risk tolerance and bile duct injury: surgeon characteristics, risk-taking preference, and common bile duct injuries. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209: 17-24.

2. Lee J, Miller P, Kermani R, Dao H, O’Donnell. Gallbladder damage control: compromised procedure for compromised patients. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 2779-2783.

3. Soper NJ. Damage control cholecystectomy. How to get out of trouble in the O.R. Congreso Internacional del American College of Surgeons. Chicago Il, EUA. Octubre, 2012.

4. Miller P. A prospective controlled trial comparing single incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: caution before damage control. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012; 22: 220-225.

5. Lee HY, Kim KH, et al. Comparing of the results between single port and three ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2012; 59: 1761-1764.

6. Linci MM, Califano A. Management of complicated gallstones: results of an alternative approach to difficult cholecystectomies. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2010; 19: 304-315.

7. Hussain A. Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: current evidence and strategies of management. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011; 21: 211-217.

8. Cherng N, et al. Use of cholecystostomy tubes in the management of patients with primary diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. J Am Coll Surg 2012; 214: 196-201.

9. Eikermann M, Siegel R, et al. Prevention and treatment of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the clinical practice Guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 3003-3039.