medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Médica Sur

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Med Sur 2012; 19 (3)

Calidad de atención del dolor postoperatorio en cirugía ginecológica

Calderón-Estrada M, Pichardo-Cuevas M, Suárez-Muñiz MP, Ramírez-Montiel ML, Contreras-Carreto NA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 144-148
PDF size: 80.01 Kb.


Key words:

Postoperative pain, Gynecological surgery, Quality of healthcare.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience resulting from actual or potential tissue damage. It is estimated that the incidence of acute postoperative pain (APOP) is between 20 to 70%. Inadequate control of postoperative pain causes changes in lung function, cardiovascular and endocrine function and increases the morbidity. In terms of management, adequate control impact in reducing the hospital stay and reducing health costs. Objective. Determine the incidence of acute APOP, treatment options and their effectiveness in gynecologic surgery. Material and methods. Prospective, transversal, descriptive and analytical study in women of postoperative gynecological surgery at the Women’s Hospital, Ministry of Health; Mexico City, during the period of April 1st to May 31st, 2011. Results. The final sample consisted of 75 patients. The average age was 41.03 ± 10.5 years. The most common type of gynecological surgery was total abdominal hysterectomy with 68.0% (n = 51). The 58.7% (n = 44) received mixed general anesthesia, 41.3% (n = 31) was epidural anesthesia. The operative time was 1.95 ± 0.51 h. APOP incidence was 94.7%. The result in Numeric Verbal Pain Scale (NVPS) was 5.67 ± 3.4 points in the immediate postoperative period and 4.2 ± 8.2 points in mediate postoperative period. The reduction in pain with analgesic therapy was 1.39 ± 4.33 points evaluated by NVPS. In 56.0% (n = 42) was used only nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in combination with antispasmodics. Only 13.3% (n = 10) of the referred patients satisfied with the healthcare of APOP. Conclusions. Evaluate and properly treat the APOP is essential in the postoperative treatment. Poor treatment raises the quality of care and overall satisfaction of patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Pérez J, Ortiz JR, Abejón D, Pérez-Cajaraville J. El dolor y su tratamiento a través de la historia. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2005; 6: 373-84.

  2. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Pain Standards for 2001. Disponible en: www.jcahco.org

  3. Torres LM, Martínez-Vázquez de Castro J. Prevalencia del dolor postoperatorio. Alteraciones fisiopatológicas y sus repercusiones. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2000; 7: 465-76.

  4. Marcote C, Santiago J, Salmerón J, Muñoz-Blanco F. Complicaciones del dolor postoperatorio. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2001; 3: 194-211.

  5. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Acute Pain Management Guideline. AHCPR, 1992.

  6. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 1071-8.

  7. Carr DB, Miaskowski C, Dedrick SC, Rhys Williams G. Management of Perioperative Pain in Hospitalized Patients: A National Survey. J Clin Anesth 1998; 10: 77-85.

  8. De Kock M. Expanding our horizons: Transition of Acute Postoperative Pain to Persistent Pain and Establishment of Chronic Postsurgical Pain Services. Anesthesiology 2009; 1: 461-3.

  9. Esteve N, del Rosario E, Giménez I, Montero F, Baena M, Ferrer A. Analgesia postoperatoria en cirugía mayor: ¿Es hora de cambiar nuestros protocolos? Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2009; 16: 239-45.

  10. Muñoz-Ramón JM, Carr DB, Sukiennik A, Wurn WH. Tratamiento del dolor agudo postoperatorio. Protocolos y procedimientos del New England Medical Center de Boston. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2002; 9: 176-88.

  11. Rawal N, Berggren L. Organization of acute pain services. A low cost model. Pain 1994; 57: 117-23.

  12. ASA. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 843-63.

  13. Kwok RF, Lim J, Chan MT, Gin T, Chiu WK. Preoperative ketamine improves postoperative analgesia after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1044-9.

  14. Schwenk W, Schinkel B. Perioperative pain therapy. Chirurg 2011; 82: 539-56.

  15. Feng J, Chung F. Postoperative pain: a challenge for anesthetists in ambulatory surgery. Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 293-6.

  16. Austrup ML, Korean G. Analgesic agents for the postoperative period, Opioids. Surg Clin North Am 1999; 79: 253-73.

  17. González de Mejía N. Analgesia multimodal postoperatoria. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 12 2005; 2: 112-8.

  18. Santiago A, Águila D, Nieto-Monteagudo C, González-Cabrera N, González-Pérez E. Analgesia postoperatoria con tramadol epidural tras histerectomía abdominal. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2006; 6: 399-405.

  19. Real J, Pulido C, López-Galera S, Gordo F, Fernández-Galinsk D. Conocimientos y actitudes de pacientes y personal sanitario frente al dolor postoperatorio. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2007; 1: 3-8.

  20. Gil M, Vázquez-Guerrero JC, Rodríguez de la Torre MR, Gallego JI. Estimación de la prevalencia e intensidad del dolor postoperatorio y su relación con la satisfacción de los pacientes. Rev Soc Esp Dolor 2004; 4: 197-202.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Sur. 2012;19