medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista del Hospital Juárez de México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Hosp Jua Mex 2011; 78 (2)

El papel del personal del Hospital Juárez de México en Bioética. Encuesta que explora los conocimientos bioéticos en el personal médico, de enfermería, paramédico y administrativo

Hernández BCE, Oriol LSA, Delgado OMD, Valle ML, Verduzco E, Tejeda RM, Gil GR, León VG, Escalante GP, Martínez PH, Mejía HJA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 97-104
PDF size: 144.08 Kb.


Key words:

Bioethics, Committee on Bioethics Hospital, knowledge.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To know the level of basic knowledge of bioethics (B) and the labor in Committee of Hospital Bioethics (BHC) into the community of the Hospital Juarez de Mexico through a survey. Materials and methods. An anonymous survey was conducted at this hospital’s health personnel. The questionnaire consisting of 13 closed answer questions. Statistics by frequency and percentage. Results. Recovered 373 answered questionnaires (74.6%). Medical ethics concepts were correctly answered by physicians (42.8%), nurses (43.1%), researchers (39.3%), social work (34.8%), administrative (30.5%). Knowledge and use of the BHC’s hospital; medical: (yes) (no) 92 and 68%, respectively, nurses: 64 to 82%; researchers: 57 and 83%; social work: 58 to 77%; administrative staff: 38 and 90%. Because not consulted the BHC?, the answer was who had never had a dilemma bioethical, 52% doctors; nurses, 41%; researchers, 57%; social work, 67%; and administrative, 50% (total 53.4%). Discussion. The percentage of basic knowledge of medical ethics in our study is below than works in Argentina and Cuba. The 69.8%, knows the existence of BHC however 84% has not consulted it and most consistent in that has not had bioethical problem or dilemma. Conclusions. Most of the staff of the HJM unknown the basics of medical ethics, there is a gap of knowledge on which makes the hospital BHC. Is needed to enhance the teaching and research in this area, task incumbent local BHC as well as the National Commission of Bioethics and public and private universities of the country, particularly in aspects of doily medical practice, thus helping significantly to the health-care providers to identify bioethical problems


REFERENCES

  1. Potter VR. Bridge to the Future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall Pub; 1971.

  2. Beauchamp TL, Childress F. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University; 1979.

  3. Callahan D. Bioethics. In: Reich WT (ed.). Encyclopedia of Bioethics. Revised edition. New York: The Free Press, Simon & Schuster MacMillan; 1995.

  4. Tealdi J, Mainetti J. Los comités hospitalarios de ética. Boletín OPS 1990; 108: 431-8.

  5. Brussino S. Bioética, deliberación y juicio razonable. Buenos Aires: Bioética y Bioderecho; 2002, p. 21-47.

  6. Garrafa V. Bioética, Saudé e Ciudadania. O Mundo de Saude 1999; (23)5: 263-9.

  7. Lynch-Pueyrredón D, Muraccio M, Del Valle M, Giglio N, Benítez A. Encuesta sobre Bioética en un hospital de pediatría. Bases para futuras estrategias. Medicina 2004; 64: 37-42.

  8. Luengas I, Feinholz D, Soberón. Comisión Nacional de Bioética: su entender, su quehacer. Comisión Nacional de Bioética, Debate bioético 2007; 1(2): 5-64.

  9. Reyes-Madelín. Exploración de conocimientos bioéticos en el personal de enfermería del Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico de Cienfuegos. Rev Cubana Enf 1997; 13(1): 20-4.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Hosp Jua Mex. 2011;78