medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica del Centro

ISSN 1995-9494 (Electronic)
Revista del Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico "Arnaldo Milián Castro"
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med Cent 2013; 7 (2)

Placement of bioprosthesis in potentially contaminated areas in emergency surgery

Díaz GEE, García OM, Hernández GD, Centeno PB, Tozcano GC, Burgos YP
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page:
PDF size: 70.62 Kb.


Key words:

bioprosthesis, hernia, operative surgical procedures.

ABSTRACT

All patients undergoing emergency surgery due to hernia complications were studied. The universe and the sample consisted of two groups. The first group included all inguinal and femoral hernias and any combination of these. Inguinal hernias predominated in men older than 61 years. The most commonly used techniques were the Lichtenstein technique, in the prosthetic variants, and the Leo Zimmerman’s in the tension ones. Seroma was the most common complication of the above mentioned techniques and recurrence was higher in the tension ones – four cases, for a 4.5%. In the second group, all incisional and midline hernias were included (umbilical and epigastric). Most of the surgical interventions were umbilical hernias –69 patients– also in men older than 61 years. The technique described by Jean Rives was among the prosthetic variants, and the Mayo-Robson technique in the tension ones. Seroma was the most common complication in both techniques and recurrence was higher in the tension ones–five patients for 8.7%. The sample showed that the use of surgical mesh has not produced an increase in postoperative complications of septic origin but, on the contrary, there has been a considerable reduction of recurrence in emergency hernia surgery using bioprosthesis.


REFERENCES

  1. Schulz M, Uhesek F, Mejías P. Hernia Incisional. Cuad Cir. 2003;17:103–11.

  2. Courtney C, Lee A, Wilson C. Ventral Hernia repair: a study of current practice. Hernia. 2003;7:44–6.

  3. Gamboa C, Jarufe N, Funke R, Pimentel F, Ibañez L, Boza C. Reparación de Hernias Incisionales por vía laparoscópica. Rev Chil Cir. 2010 Feb;62(1):42–8.

  4. Pérez P. Eventraciones. En: Pérez P, Amat J. Hernias Abdominales. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria; 1999. p. 89-104.

  5. Asociación Mexicana de Hernia. Guías de práctica clínica para Hernias de la pared Abdominal. AMH [Internet]. 2009 [actualizado 3 Ene 2009; citado 11 Mar 2013]:23–41. Disponible en: http://www.amhernia.org/guias.pdf

  6. Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Arndt M. Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts’ meeting. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;386:65-73.

  7. Clark JL. Ventral incisional hernia recurrence. J Surg Res. 2001;99:33-9.

  8. Martin-Duce A, Noguerales F, Villeta R, Hernandez P, Lozano O. Modifications to Rives technique for midline incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2001;5:70-2.

  9. Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? Ann Surg. 2003;237:129-35.

  10. Dumanian GA, Denham W. Comparison of repair techniques for major incisional hernias. Am J Surg. 2003;185:61-5.

  11. Téllez R, Unshelm G. Hernioplastia inguinal. Uso del tapón de malla. [tesis] Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela; 2007.

  12. Murphy JW. Use of the prolene hernia system for inguinal hernia repair: retrospective, comparative time analysis versus other inguinal hernia repair systems. Am Surg. 2001;67:919-23.

  13. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK. The tension free hernioplasty. Am J Surg. 1989;152:188-93.

  14. Mayagoitia JC. Inguinal hernioplasty with the prolene hernia system. Hernia. 2004;8:64-6.

  15. 15.Amid P. The Lichtenstein repair in 2002: an overview of causes of recurrence after Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty. Hernia. 2003;7:13-16.

  16. 16.Bendavid R. Complications of groin hernia surgery. Surg Clin North. Am. 1998;78:1089.

  17. Adye B, Luna G. Incidence of abdominal wall hernia in aortic surgery. Am J Surg. 2007;175:400-2.

  18. Primatesta P, Goldacre MT. Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality. Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:835-39.

  19. Smith RS. The use oC Prosthetic Material in the Repair oC Hernia. Surg Clin North Am. 1971 Dec;51:1387-99.

  20. Montecinos R. Re-recurrencia de la reparación de una recidiva de hernia inguinal. Un estudio nacional de 8 años de seguimiento sobre el rol del tipo de reparación. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2008 Abr [citado 11 Mar 2013];247(4):[aprox. 2 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.cirugiahsalvador.cl/ed_continua/resumenes-publicaciones/471-re-recurrencia-de-la-reparacion-de-una-recidiva-de-hernia-inguinal.-un-estudio-nacional-de-8-aos-de-seguimiento-sobre-el-rol-del-tipo-de-reparacion.html




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med Cent. 2013;7