medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cardiología

ISSN 0188-2198 (Print)
En 2019, la Revista Mexicana de Cardiología cambió a Cardiovascular and Metabolic Science

Ver Cardiovascular and Metabolic Science


  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cardiol 2013; 24 (2)

Determinating the location of the permanent pacemaker lead in the right ventricle outflow tract by computed tomography

Bonilla-Morales I, Guevara-Valdivia ME, Gómez-León I, Solano MS, Quezada-Bucio HG, Sánchez-Espinola V, Molina GJA, Cruz-Domínguez P, de la Rosa-Jiménez JM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 69-75
PDF size: 352.27 Kb.


Key words:

Pacemaker, right ventricle outflow tract, electrocardiogram, tomography, ventricular asynchrony.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Determination of the location of the lead of the permanent pacemaker in the right ventricle outflow tract (RVOT) it’s difficult with the conventional techniques (fluoroscopic images and electrocardiography). The computed tomography (CT) allows to determinate in three dimensions the relation between the lead and the RVOT. Objective: Determine the location of the electrode lead by computed tomography and compare the results with electrocardiographic and fluoroscopy images localization. Material and methods: 36 patients were included with VVI permanent pacemaker with the lead in the RVOT. A 12-lead electrocardiogram, fluoroscopy images and CT were performed to determine the position of the lead in the RVOT. Results: By electrocardiogram, we located the lead in septal wall 58.3% and free wall 41.7%. By fluoroscopy images in left anterior oblique (LAO) 35° the lead was located on the anterior wall 5.6%, free wall 38.9% and septal 55.6%; in LAO 45° anterior wall 2.8%, free wall 44.4% and septal 52.8%. By Tomography the lead was positioned on anterior wall in 39%, free wall 48% and septal 13%. The Kappa coefficient of the 3 tests showed very low concordance. Conclusion: CT is a better method for determining the position of the lead on the RVOT compared to fluoroscopy images an electrocardiogram.


REFERENCES

  1. Deborah S, Roselie A, Brad A. Databases for studying the epidemiology of implanted medical devices. The Bionic Human. 2006: 115-132.

  2. Vardas P, Auricchio A, Blanc JJ, Daubert JC, Drexler H, Ector H et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association. European Heart Journal. 2007; 28: 2256-2295.

  3. Karpawich P, Rabah R, Haas J. Altered cardiac histology following apical right ventricular pacing in patients with congenital atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999; 9: 1372-7.

  4. Zhang XH, Chen H, Siu CW, Yiu KH, Chan WS, Lee KL et al. New on set heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008; 19: 136-41.

  5. Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29: 744-9.

  6. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2932-7.

  7. Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, Greene HL, Hallstrom AP, Hsia H et al. Dual chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the dual chamber and VVI implantable defibrillator (DAVID) trial. JAMA. 2002; 288: 3115-23.

  8. Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997; 350: 1210-16.

  9. Thambo JB, Bordachar P, Garrigue S, Lafitte S, Sanders P, Reuter S et al. Detrimental ventricular remodeling in patients with congenital complete heart block and chronic right ventricular apical pacing. Circulation. 2004; 110: 3766-72.

  10. Shimony A, Eisenberg M, Filion K, Amit G. Beneficial effects of right ventricular non-apical versus apical pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized– controlled trials. Europace. 2011; 10: 53-65.

  11. Shima T, Ohnishi Y, Inoue T, Yoshida A, Shimizu H, Itagaki T, Sekiya J et al. The relation between the pacing sites in the right ventricular outflow tract and QRS morphology in the 12-lead ECG. Jpn Circ J. 1998; 62: 399-404.

  12. Balt J, Van Hemel N, Wellens H, De Voogt W. Radiological and electrocardiographic characterization of right ventricular outflow tract pacing. Europace. 2010; 12: 1739-1744.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cardiol. 2013;24