medigraphic.com
SPANISH

MediSan

ISSN 1029-3019 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 03

<< Back Next >>

MediSan 2013; 17 (03)

Status of nosocomial sepsis: underreporting and non-observance of established health standards

Marrero RH, Quintero SS, Blanco ZGL, Duarte GS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 462-468
PDF size: 55.99 Kb.


Key words:

nosocomial sepsis, epidemiological health standards, secondary health care.

ABSTRACT

A descriptive, retrospective and cross sectional study was carried out in 315 patients with nosocomial sepsis in "Dr. Juan Bruno Zayas Alfonso" General Teaching Hospital of Santiago de Cuba, from January to September 2011, to determine the status of the morbid process through some variables of interest, such as number of people affected with sepsis according to the hospital service, rate that they represented, location of sepsis, microbiological map, among others. Based on the results, it could be concluded that there was an underreporting of nosocomial infections and deficiencies in the observance of epidemiological health standards. To reduce or eliminate some elements that can cause sepsis, intervention strategies were recommended in this health institution.


REFERENCES

  1. Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, et al. Harrison. Principios de Medicina Interna. 17 ed. México, D.F.: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2009: V 1. p. 886.

  2. Jasso Gutiérrez L. Neonatología práctica. 7 ed. México, D.F.: El Manual Moderno; 2008. p. 273.

  3. Stoll BJ. The global impact of neonatal infection. Clin Perinatol. 1997; 24: 1-21.

  4. Nizet V, Klein JO. Bacterial sepsis and meningitis. En: Remington J, Klein J, Wilson C, Nizet V, Maldonado Y. Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn. 7 ed. Melbourne, VIC: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010. p. 835-90.

  5. Ng PC, Lam HS. Diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006; 18(2): 125-31.

  6. Gerdes JS. Clinicopathologic approach to the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Clin Perinatol. 1991; 18(2): 361-81.

  7. Baker CJ. Group B streptococcal infections. Clin Perinatol. 1997; 24(1): 59-70.

  8. Spector SA, Ticknor W, Grossman M. Study of the usefulness of clinical an hematologic findings in the diagnosis of neonatal bacterial infections. Clin Pediatr. 1981; 20(6): 385-92.

  9. Weinberg GA, D'Angio CT. Laboratory Aids for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. En: Remington J, Klein J, Wilson C, Nizet V, Maldonado Y. Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn. 7 ed. Melbourne, VIC: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010. p. 1223-35.

  10. McCabe K, Zhang Y, Huang BL, Li ST, Khan G, McCabe E. Bacterial species identification after amplification with a universal primer pair. Pediatr Res. 1996; 39: 179.

  11. Pérez E, Weisman L. Novel approaches to the prevention and therapy of neonatal bacterial sepsis. Clin Perinatol. 1997; 24(1): 213-29.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

MediSan. 2013;17