Macías HDR, Morán DLS, Rincón RDP, Tobón HÁM, Ardila MCM

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 278-288
PDF size: 133.40 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: one of the main goals of oral implantology is to attain the initial cicatrization, which is a definitive factor in the survival of dental implants.
Objective: to determine the state of survival of dental implants collocated in patients that assisted to the Cooperative University of Colombia between June and December, 2011.
Method: a cross-sectional study was conducted. The sample included 59 dental implants in 15 patients with the objective of analyzing the variables related to the upper jaw: anatomical place, type of incision, design and diameter, length of the implants, radiographic appearance, and mobility of the implants; as well as the presence of pain during the evaluation of the installed implants. The medium time of survival of the implants was described through the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: fifty-nine implants were evaluated in 15 patients with an average age of 54 years; the 60 % of the implants were installed in female patients. The 50.85 % installed implants were found in the upper jaw and the 49.15 % in the lower jaw. The 96.6 % were installed in patients with partial loss of the teeth; the 3.4 % were in total edentulous patients. The survival of the implants for upper jaw was of a 96.6 %, and for the lower jaw of a 93.1 %.
Conclusions: in the present study, the survival of dental implants was high; some failures occurred during the first months of cicatrization.

REFERENCES

1. Rodrigo D, Aracil L, Martin C, Sanz M. Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival: a prospective case series study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:255-61.

2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark P-I. A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. J Oral surg. 1981;6:387-416.

3. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:399-410.

4. Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw-retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:163-201.

5. Scheuber S, Hicklin S, Brägger U. Implants versus short-span fixed bridges: survival, complications, patients' benefits. A systematic review on economic aspects. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:50-62.

6. Bilhan H, Geckili O, Mumcu E, Bozdag E, Sunbuloglu E, Kutay O. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:900-7.

7. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23 Suppl 6:22-38.

8. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1:11-25.

9. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate, immediate-delayed and delayed implants). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8;(9):CD005968.

10. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV. Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Autumn;3(3):189-205.

11. Sesma N, Pannuti CM, Cardaropoli G. Retrospective clinical study of 988 dual Acid-etched implants placed in grafted and native bone for single-tooth replacement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:1243-8.

12. Sakka S, Baroudi K, Nassani MZ. Factors associated with early and late failure of dental implants. J Investig Clin Dent. 2012;3:258-61.

13. Poporad ED. Increasing patient access to implant care. Documentation of 642 successful implants placed during six years. Dent Today. 2012;31:88-9.

14. Jang H, Kang J, Lee K, Park P. A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants. J Adv Prostodont. 2011;3:204-15.

15. Arnhart C, Dvorak G, Trefil C, Huber C, Watzek G, Zechner W. Impact of implant surface topography: a clinical study with a mean functional loading time of 85 months. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02498.x

16. Peñarrocha D, Demarchi CL, Maestre F, Carrillo C, Peñarrocha O-D, Peñarrocha D-MA. A retrospective comparison of 1,022 implants: immediate versus nonimmediate. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:421-7.

17. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: A preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. J Oral Maxilofac Implants. 1989;4:211-17.

18. Cooper LF. Factors influencing primary dental implant stability remain unclear. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2010;10:44-5

19. Romeo E, Lops D,Amorfini L, Chiapasco M, GhisolfiM, Vogel G. Clinical and Radiografic evaluation of small- diametre (3.3mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: a longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2006;17:139-48.

20. Schliephake H, Neukam FW, Wichmann M. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in bone grafts used for treatment of severe alveolar ridge atrophy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:1227-33.