medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas

Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Esp Med Quir 2013; 18 (2)

Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems: Current Perspective

Durán MKM, Valenzuela GD
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 163-166
PDF size: 372.39 Kb.


Key words:

bone-anchored hearing systems, hearing loss, oseointegration, titanio implant.

ABSTRACT

Bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHS) technology was adopted from dental research in titanium implants and osseointegration. BAH system was initially introduced to replace bone vibration devices, for patients unable to use air conduction hearing aids (mastoidectomy cavity patients, recurrent otorrhea, congenital aural atresia). The latest application is its use as a method of transcranial transmission signal in cases of unilateral hearing loss, such as acoustic neurinoma, sudden hearing loss, Ménière's disease and others. In this article we review the history of the BAHS, its technology, indications, the surgery for placement, complications and outcomes.


REFERENCES

  1. Koch DB, Staller S, Jaax K, et al. Bioengineering solutions for hearing loss and related disorders. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2005;38:255-272.

  2. Janssen RM, Hong P, Chadha NK, et al. Bilateral boneanchored hearing aids for bilateral permanent conductive hearing loss: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;147:413-422.

  3. Christensen L, Smith L, Kimberlain J y col. Comparison of traditional bone-conduction hearing aids with the Baha system. J Am Acad Audiol 2010;21:267-273.

  4. Tjellstrom A, Hakansson B, Granstrom G. Bone-anchored hearing aids. In: Maniglia AJ, Proops DW, editors. Implantable electronic otologic devices-State of the Art. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2001;34.

  5. Dun CA, de Wolf MJ, Hol MK, Wigren S, et al. Stability, survival, and tolerability of a novel Baha implant system: six-month data from a multicenter clinical investigation. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:1001-1007.

  6. Wazen JJ, Gupta R, Ghossaini S, et al. Osseointegration timing for Baha system loading. Laryngoscope 2007;117:794-796.

  7. De Smet E, Jaecques S, Vandamme K, y col. Positive effect of early loading on implant stability in the bi-cortical guinea pig model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:402-407.

  8. Newman C, Sandrige S, Wodzisz L. Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:1123-1131.

  9. Ferreira R, Kiesewetter A, Satomi L, et al. Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA): indications, functional results, and comparison with reconstructive surgery of the ear. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;16:400-405.

  10. De Wolf M, Hol M, Huygen P, et al. Clinical outcome of the simplified surgical technique for BAHA implantation. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:1100-1108.

  11. Dalmau J, Tamarit J, Murcia V, et al. BAHA: a new longitudinal incision with fixture out of the incision. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2009;60:278-282.

  12. House J, Kutz J. Bone-anchored hearing aids: incidence and management of postoperative complications. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:213-217.

  13. Wazen JJ, Young DL, Farrugia MC, Chandrasekhar SS, et al. Successes and complications of the Baha system. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:1115-1119.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Esp Med Quir. 2013;18