medigraphic.com
SPANISH

MediSan

ISSN 1029-3019 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 08

<< Back Next >>

MediSan 2013; 17 (08)

Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of dengue epidemic in Santiago de Cuba municipality

Macías MCD, Gámez SD, Rodríguez VA, Baquero SJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 3042-3048
PDF size: 42.26 Kb.


Key words:

epidemic, dengue, morbimortality, endemic area, vectorial index, Santiago de Cuba.

ABSTRACT

A descriptive and cross-sectional study of 13 147 patients from Santiago de Cuba municipality was carried out, in order to characterize the dengue epidemic from the clinical and epidemiological point of view, which affected this municipality from 2006 to 2007, for this purpose a multidisciplinary team was formed by epidemiologists, clinical doctors, pediatricians and gyneco-obstetricians. Cases were characterized according to variables of clinical and epidemiological interest. Female sex (50.6%) in those under 15 years (92.3%), the clinical classical form of dengue (98.6%) and July-August-September as the months of higher notification of cases. Morbimortality was known in a population susceptible to a previously non identified new serotype and it was shown that the secondary infection in the younger population was not enough to produce the hemorrhagic forms of this disease; therefore, it was recommended to maintain close control on the travellers coming from endemic areas and with high vectorial indexes.


REFERENCES

  1. Edelman R. Dengue vaccines approach the finish line. CID. 2007;45(Suppl 1):S56– S60.

  2. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Number of reported cases of dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) in the Americas, by country: Figures for 2009 (to week noted by each country). Washington DC: OPS; 2009. [citado 8 Dic 2012]

  3. Narro Robles J, Gómez Dantés H. El dengue en México: un problema prioritario de salud pública. Salud Pública Mex. 1995;37(Suppl 1):12-20.

  4. Vargas Vargas L, Bustillos de Núñez G. Técnicas participativas para la educación popular. Chile: CIDE;1990.

  5. Guzmán MG, García G, Kourí G. Dengue y fiebre hemorrágica de dengue, un problema de salud mundial. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 2008 [citado 8 Dic 2012];60(1).

  6. Fajardo P, Monje CA, Lozano G, Realpe O, Hernandez LE. Nociones populares sobre dengue y rompehuesos, dos modelos de la enfermedad en Colombia. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2001;10(3):161-8.

  7. De la Cruz AM, Figueroa D, Chacón L, Gómez M, Díaz M, Finlay CM. Conocimientos, opiniones y prácticas sobre Aedes aegypti. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 1999;51(2):135-7.

  8. Vila montes GA, Martínez M, Sherman C, Fernández Cerna E. Evaluación de un módulo escolar sobre dengue y Aedes Aegypti dirigido a escolares en Honduras. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2004;16(2)1-15.

  9. Acosta Cabrera S, Chalgud Moreno AM, Baydes González RO, Abraham Marcel EA. Modificación de los conocimientos, aptitudes y prácticas de la población sobre la prevención de los mosquitos. Rev Cubana Hig Epidemiolol. 1999;37(1):6-12.

  10. Roca Goderich R, Smith Smith V, Paz Presilla E, Losada Gómez J, Serret Rodríguez B, Llamos Sierra N, et al. Enfermedades microbianas y parasitarias. Dengue. En: Temas de medicina interna. 4 ed. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas;2002:t 3. p. 573-8.

  11. Valdés García L, Carbonell García I, Delgado Bustillo J, Santín Peña M. Enfermedades emergentes y reemergentes. La Habana: Ministerio de Salud Pública;1998. p.178-95.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

MediSan. 2013;17