medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Oftalmología

ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2013; 26 (1)

Keratometries with use of Pentacam and of the medical history method in hypermetropic patients with previous refractive surgery

Cárdenas DT, Torres OR, Corcho AY, Capote CA, Cuan AY, Hernández LI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 111-120
PDF size: 79.72 Kb.


Key words:

keratometry, refractive surgery, Excimer laser, hypermetropia.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to compare keratometries measured by Pentacam in operated hypermetropic eyes with Excimer Laser and that of the medical history method.
Methods: aprospective study conducted in 50 hypermetropic eyes of 25 patients operated on by LASIK at "Ramón Pando Ferrer" Cuban Institute of Ophthalmology from March to June of 2011. The average keratometry through the medical history method was estimated and compared with the keratometry values provided by Pentacam : value of the corneal apex of color maps, True Net Power (total central keratometric value) and Equivalent K-reading Power(equivalent keratometric reading) as well as the total keratometric value of 3.0 mm and the equivalent readings of Holladay Report program. The mean preoperative keratometry of the medical history was estimated and then compared with the preoperative keratometry measured by Pentacam. The statistical analysis was based on paired t test, using 95 % significance level.
Results: the values that did not show significant statistical differences in comparison with that of the clinical history method were the Equivalent K-reading Power (equivalent keratometric readings), the total keratometric value and the equivalent keratometric readings of 3.4 and 4.5 diameters, being 4.5 mm the most exact. No differences were seen in the preoperative keratometries.
Conclusion: Pentacam provides corneal powers that did not differ statistically from those of the clinical history method in hypermetropic eyes having previous surgery with Excimer laser.


REFERENCES

  1. Savini G, Barboni P, Zanini M. Correlation between attempted correction and keratometric refractive index of the cornea after myopic excimer laser surgery. J Refract Surg. 2007;23(5):461-6.

  2. Kawamorita T, Uozato H, Kamiya K, Leon Bax, Tsutsui K, Aizawa D, et al. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(1):127-33.

  3. Pakoslawski F, Ghilino O, Marotta H, Estavillo M, Argibay C. Cálculo de lente intraocular luego de cirugía refractiva miópica: nuestro método. Resultados preliminares. Arch Oftal B Aires. 2009;80(3):91-4.

  4. Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2000;16(3):349-61.

  5. Savini G, Barboni P, Profazio V, Zanini M, Hoffer KJ. Corneal power measurements with the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera after myopic excimer laser surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(5):809-13.

  6. Savini G, Barboni P, Zanini M. Intraocular lens power calculation after myopic refractive surgery: theoretical comparison of different methods. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(8):1271-82.

  7. Pérez D, Pérez M, Pérez F. Cálculo de lente intraocular en casos complicados: El método Silguero. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005 [citado 12 Dic 2011];80(10). Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=S0365-66912005001000006&script=sci_arttext&tlng=e

  8. Gullstrand A. Procedure of the rays in the eye imagery-laws of the first order. The optical system of the eye. En: Helmholtz Hv, Southall J, editors. Helmholtz´s treatise on physiological optics. Rochester: The Optical Society of America; 1924. p. 301-58.

  9. Martín C. Cálculo de lente intraocular post-cirugía refractiva con fórmula Haigis L. Arch Oftal B Aires. 2009;80(3):121-3.

  10. Feiz V, Mannis M, Garcia-Ferrer F. Intraocular lens power calculation after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and hyperopia: a standardized approach. Cornea. 2001;20(8):792- 7.

  11. Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Zanini M. IOL power calculations after LASIK and PRK. Cataract Refractive Surgery Today Europe. 2007 [cited 2011 Dic 12]. Available from: http://www.bmctoday.net/crstodayeurope/2007/04 /article.asp?f=0407_09.php

  12. Mesa J, Martí T, Arruga J. Cálculo del poder dióptrico de la lente intraocular (LIO) tras cirugía refractiva. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2005;80(12):699-703.

  13. Jain R, Dilraj G, Grewal SPS. Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55(5):341-7.

  14. Cosentino J, Badoza D. Cálculo del lente intraocular en pacientes operados de cirugía refractiva. Consejo Argentino de Oftalmología; 2002 [citado 12 dic del 2011];15(1). Disponible en: http://www.oftalmologos.org.ar/mo/mo151-27.html

  15. Prado A, Camas-Benítez L, Sosa S.¿Cómo evitar la sorpresa refractiva? Cálculo del poder dióptrico de lentes intraoculares en casos especiales. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2010;84(1):39-48.

  16. Charles M. Cálculo de lente intraocular post-cirugía refractiva con fórmula haigis l. Arch Oftal B Aires. 2009 [citado 12 Dic 2011];80(4). Disponible en: http://sao.org.ar/N%C3%BAmerosAnteriores /Volumen80_04/80_04_03/tabid/436/language/es-AR/Default.aspx

  17. Lackner B, Schmidinger G, Pieh S. Repeatability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan, and ultrasound. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(10):892-9.

  18. Arce G, López Moreno G. Cálculo del lente intraocular después de cirugía refractiva. Rev Col Oftalmol. 2007;40(1):205-46.

  19. Kenneth J, Hoffer M. Calculating intraocular lens power after refractive corneal surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(4):500-1.

  20. Wang L, Booth M, Koch D. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2004;111(10):1825-31.

  21. Belin M, Holladay J, Michelson A, Woodhams J, Ahmed I. The Pentacam: precision, confidence, results and accurate "Ks". Cataract Refractive Surgery Today; 2007 [cited 2011 Dic 5 ]. Available from: http://www.pentacam.com/downloads/artikel/2007 - Supplement_Pentacam_AAO_2006.pdf

  22. Shammas H, Hoffer K, Shammas M. Scheimpflug photography keratometry readings for routine intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(2):330-4.

  23. Mesa J, Ruiz C. El cálculo de la lente intraocular tras cirugía foto-refractiva corneal. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2009;84(6):283-92.

  24. Aramberri J. Cálculo de la lente intraocular tras cirugía refractiva corneal. En: Alió J, Rodríguez-Prats J, editores. Buscando la excelencia en la cirugía de la catarata. Barcelona: Glosa; 2006. p. 179-91.

  25. Dubbelman M, Weeber A, Heijde L, Völker-Dieben J. Radius and asphericity of the posterior corneal surface determined by corrected Scheimpflug photography. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80(4):379-83.

  26. Kim SW, Kim EK, Cho BJ, Kim SW, Song KY, Kim TI. Use of the pentacam true net corneal power for intraocular lens calculation in eyes after refractive corneal surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(3):285-9.

  27. Cuan Y, Pérez E, Montero E, Santiesteban I, Ortega L, Cárdenas T. Utilidad del Pentacam para medir el poder corneal después de cirugía refractiva con excímer láser. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2010 [citado 22 Dic 2011];23 Supl 1. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762010000300006&lng=es




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub Oftal. 2013;26