medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 3

Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2013; 16 (3)

Sexual desire in men with and without vasectomy: experiences and meaning

Córdoba BDI, Arias GA, Sapién CA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 707-719
PDF size: 198.05 Kb.


Key words:

Sexual desire, Men, Vasectomy, Experiences, Meaning.

ABSTRACT

For the study and understanding of sexual desire it is necessary to consider physiological, psychological and socio-cultural factors. Men confirm their manhood by expressing their sexual desire; therefore, this is an issue that concerns them when deciding to get a vasectomy. Objective: To compare sexualdesire experiences and meanings in men with and without vasectomy. Method: Mixed-type research: qualitative and quantitative. Fifteen men without vasectomy (group A) and 15 men with vasectomy (group B) voluntarily participated. Informed consent and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Results: Comparatively, before operation more men of group B used condoms and coitus interruptus as contraceptive methods. In both groups, the first-intercourse average was 17,6 years old and their sexual desire was described as: drives, feelings, desires, thoughts, fantasies and emotions towards sexual penetration (vaginal, anal, or oral) that resulted in an ejaculation and orgasm. In Group B, sexual desire slightly decreased due to post-surgical discomfort and pain. Further, in most men, as a result of their confidence of non-reproduction, there was an increase of sexual desire and an augmentation of their sexual activity. Conclusions: In both groups sexual desire depends on several factors to become a sexual act.


REFERENCES

  1. Adams, Ch.E. y Wald, M. (2009). Riesgos y complicaciones de la vasectomía. Urologic Clinics of North America, 36, 331-336.

  2. Art, KS. y Angia, AK. (2009). Técnicas de vasectomía. Urologic Clinics of North America, 36, 307-316.

  3. Campo, R.M., y Labarca, R.C. (2009). La teoría fundamentada en el estudio empírico de las representaciones sociales: un caso empírico sobre el rol orientador del docente. Opción, 60, 41-54.

  4. Córdoba, B.D.I. y Sapién, L.J.S. (2010). Prefiero la Vasecto-tuya que la Vasecto-mía. México: Pax.

  5. García, M.J., y Solano, S.L.M. (2005). Aceptación y rechazo de la vasectomía en hombres del medio rural. Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 43 (3), 205-214.

  6. Gutmann, M.C. (2006). The meanings of macho. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  7. Kaplan, H.S. (1982). Trastornos del deseo sexual. Barcelona: Grijalbo.

  8. Lewis, G. (1978). The place of pain in human experience. Journal of Medical Ethics, 4, 122-125.

  9. Martínez, R.E. (1999). Psicosexualidad y conducta humana: comunidad y diversidad. Uruguay: Universidad de Concepción.

  10. Secretaria de Salud y Asistencia. (1998). Vasectomía una opción voluntaria. Planificación familiar, 3 (3).

  11. Stern, C., Fuentes, Z.C., Lozano, T.L.R., y Reynoso, F. (2003). Masculinidad y salud sexual y reproductiva: un estudio de caso en la ciudad de México. Salud Pública de México, 45, 34-42.

  12. Tandon, S. y Savanegh, E. Jr. (2008). Chronic pain after vasectomy: a disgnostic and treatment dilema. BJU International, 102 (2),166-9.

  13. Tanagho, A.E., y McAninch, W.J. (2001). Urología general de Smith. México: El Manual Moderno.

  14. Taylor, S.J. y Bogdan, R. (2000). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. Barcelona: Paidós.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Elec Psic Izt. 2013;16