medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2013; 35 (1)

Assessment of morbidity and mortality due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy with three ports technique at the Regional High Specialty Hospital of Oaxaca

Jarquín AA, Vásquez CS, Díaz HP, Muñoz HO, Sánchez GR, Geminiano ME, Silva GJC, Terrazas LVM, Sandoval MMD
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 32-35
PDF size: 155.57 Kb.


Key words:

Cholecystectomy, laparoscopy, complications.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) at the Regional Hospital of High Specialty (HRAEO, for its initials in Spanish).
Setting: Regional Hospital of High Specialty of Oaxaca (third level health care center).
Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive, comparative study.
Statistical analysis: Bivariate statistical analysis with central tendency measures and chi square.
Patients and methods: Patients subjected to LC from January 2010 to December 2011. We assessed surgical time, transoperative bleeding, percentage of conversion, days of in-hospital stay, transoperative and postoperative complications.
Results:A total of 386 patients were included, 68 (17.6%) were men of 43.51 ± 16.8 years of age. We identified: one patient with biliary tract lesion (0.3%), one patient with biliary leakage (0.3%), two patients with residual bilomas (0.5%), and a conversion percentage of 2.8% (11 cases). One patient died in the group of three ports due to acute cholangitis (global mortality = 0.3%). Percentage of complications was 4.9%; three ports were used in 355 (92%) patients and four ports in 31 (8%). When comparing both techniques, in-hospital stay was lower in the three ports group, 1.92 ± 1.22 days versus 2.87 ± 2.84 days (p = 0.0001); bleeding was lower, 55.23 + 123.48 ml versus 114.52 ± 193.04 ml (p = 0.0001); as well as surgical time, 71.05 ± 41.87 min versus 110.26 ± 61.25 min (p = 0.0001). There were no differences in morbidity (frequency of fistulae and injuries to the biliary tract).
Conclusions: Morbidity and mortality of LC at the HRAEO is similar to that reported in the world literature. The use of three ports, as compared to four ports, demonstrated a lower surgical time, in-hospital stay, and bleeding.


REFERENCES

  1. Farndorn J. Operative surgery and management. Third ed: CRC Press; 1994.

  2. Olsen DO. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991; 161: 339-344.

  3. Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new “gold standard”? Arch Surg. 1992; 127: 917-923.

  4. Schirmer BD, Edge SB, Dix J, Hyser MJ, Hanks JB, Jones RS. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Ann Surg. 1991; 213: 665-677.

  5. Csikesz NG, Singla A, Murphy MM, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci. 2010; 55: 2398-2405.

  6. Khan MH, Howard TJ, Fogel EL, Sherman S, McHenry L, Watkins JL, et al. Frequency of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy detected by ERCP: experience at a large tertiary referral center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65: 247-252.

  7. Lohan D, Walsh S, McLoughlin R, Murphy J. Imaging of the complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 904-912.

  8. Melgoza OC, Hesiquio SR, Lasky MD, Schenk PL, Hidalgo CF. Funduplicatura laparoscópica con trócares de 5 mm. ¿Evita las hernias postincisionales? Cir Gen. 2001; 23: 33-35.

  9. Lal P, Singh L, Agarwal PN, Kant R. Open port placement of the first laparoscopic port: a safe technique. JSLS. 2004; 8: 364-336.

  10. Litynski GS. Profiles in laparoscopy: Mouret, Dubois, and Perissat: the laparoscopic breakthrough in Europe (1987-1988). JSLS. 1999; 3: 163-167.

  11. Osborne D, Boe B, Rosemurgy AS, Zervos EE. Twenty-millimeter laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fewer ports results in less pain, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. Am Surg. 2005; 71: 298-302.

  12. Sarli L, Costi R, Sansebastiano G. Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15: 614-618.

  13. Poon CM, Chan KW, Lee DW, Chang KC, Ko CW, Cheung HY, et al. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17: 1624-1627.

  14. Diaz CPC, Zaldivar RFR. Colecistectomía laparoscópica con tres puertos en la línea alba. ¿Tiene menos morbilidad? Cir Gen. 2005; 27: 205-209.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2013;35