medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Enfermería del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

Revista de Enfermería del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2002, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Enferm IMSS 2002; 10 (2)

Evaluation of decubitus ulcers by Norton scale

Jiménez LMR, González HE, Largo GMB, Laureano MR, Lobatón LA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 89-91
PDF size: 26.78 Kb.


Key words:

Chronic Disease, Hospitals Chronic Disease, Nursing Service Hospital, Nursing Practical, Patient Care, Planning, Skin Ulcer, Skin Care.

ABSTRACT

The Present work arises like a restlessness to know the risk that the hospitalized patients have to present decubitus ulcers and to identify if the infirmary actions are enough. To obtain this information you uses the scale of Norton, instrument that allows to value the risk of presenting decubitus ulcers in the patient and a questionnaire to identify the valuation, cares to the skin, and changes posturales that the nurse carries out in the selected services. For the statistical analysis the tests Anova and chi were used-square where the global puntaje of risk didn't have significant difference, alone in the age category it was found that the patients in the service of Internal Medicine have a significantly bigger age to those of the services of Neurology and Neurosurgery. When comparing the interventions that the nurse carries out to prevent decubitus ulcers, in each one of the services, you/he/she was found that they are enough, with a significantly bigger percentage in the service of Internal Medicine. Concluding that the scale of Norton allows to value the risk that you/they have the patients of presenting decubitus ulcers, the nurse should apply it and based on this to carry out the preventive interventions that allow him to offer an attention of quality.


REFERENCES

  1. Sheila AS. Enfermería práctica. Madrid, España: Mosby-Doyma Libros; 1994.

  2. Helpira . Prodigyt. Next. Mx.

  3. Nancy A. Rojo, amarillo y negro: Nursing. 1990; 8: 37-39.

  4. Cathy T. Prevención de úlceras por presión: Nursing. 1998; 16: 38-39.

  5. Joan M B, Mary Y. Cómo vencer a las úlceras por presión: Nursing. 1997; 15:10-16.

  6. Tratamiento de úlceras por presión: Nursing. 1997; 15:55. Anexo 1 Riesgo de desarrollo de úlceras por presión Puntaje total Riesgo 7 a 12 alto 13 a 18 moderado 19 a 24 bajo Escala de Norton Estado físico Puntos Estado mental Puntos Bueno 4 Alerta 4 Aceptable 3 Somnoliento 3 Pobre 2 Delirio 2 Muy pobre 1 Estupor 1 Actividad Puntos Movilidad Puntos Ambulante 4 Cambios posturales 4 Camina con ayuda 3 Alguna limitaciones 3 Silla de ruedas 2 Muchas limitaciones 2 Encamado 1 Inmóvil 1 Incontinencia Puntos Edad Puntos Ninguna 4 < de 40 4 Ocasional 3 40 a 54 3 Vesical 2 55 a 69 2 Vesicaly rectal 1 70 o > 1

  7. Diane Krasner. Doce preceptos para el cuidado de las heridas: Nursing. 1993; 11: 30-40.

  8. Beth W. Coloque a su enfermo en la mejor posición: Nursing. 1995; 13: 40-44.

  9. Diane K, Karen LK. Aplique la técnica de no tocar para cambiar el apósito: Nursing. 1995; 13:48-50.

  10. Marilyn D, Harris et al. Cuidados geriátricos en enfermería. Nursing Photobook. Española: Doyna; 1987. p 43.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Enferm IMSS. 2002;10