medigraphic.com
ISSN 1729-519X (Print)

2012, Number 4

<< Back

Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas 2012; 11 (4)

Mechanic and biologic failure in implant prosthetic rehabilitation

Lemus CLM, Almagro UZE, Sáez CR, Justo DM, Sánchez SC

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 563-572
PDF size: 64.50 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: the oral implantology is a defiance to the modern odontology, it offer satisfactory result, aesthetic and functional extremely to the patients, to have present the discernment and diagnostic protocols is a fundamental requirements to know and interpret the mechanic and biologic failure that can be present.
Objective: To establish some possible causes for mechanical and biologic complications on the rehabilitation with oral implants, also to describes some preventive strategies for the planning stage, treatments and the later maintenance period to achieve a long-term success with dental implants.
Material and Methods: had been describe for different authors the basic cause of the failure in oral implantology, by means of mistakes during different established protocols, such as inappropriate selection of the patients, don't respect to the maxillary and mandible biology, trauma during oral surgery and inappropriate prosthesis rehabilitation, in general way. We made a review of the literature about failure in the design, numbers, longitude, diameters, and biologic place where the implant will be placed, the planning of the future dentures also, overload, biomechanics occlusion, and the distribution of the oclusal load.
Development: to be established the essential premises that determine failure in the dentals implant, during planning and patients selection, in the surgical and prosthetic stages, in the laboratory and maintenance phases.
Conclusions: in dental implants the professional preoccupation not should be only about planning and treatment, should be extensive to control and maintenance of them, to detect primary complications, to make interventions in the necessary moments, and to obtain long-term and success with dental implants rehabilitation.


REFERENCES

  1. Celemín A. Complicaciones en prótesis fija sobre implantes. Gaceta dental: Industria y profesiones. 2006;170(2):110-145. Disponible en: http://www.invenia.es/oai:dialnet.unirioja.es:ART0000071934

  2. Creen T, Machtei EE, Horwitz J, Peled M. Fracture of dental implants: Literature review and report of a case. Implant Dent. 2002;11(2).

  3. Krennmair G, Krainhöfner M, Weinländer M, Piehslinger E. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jul-Aug;23(4):717-25. Provisional implants for immediate restoration of partially edentulous jaws: a clinical study. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18807570

  4. Riveral JC. Implantología y sus complicaciones más frecuentes. Revista Cubana de Estomatología. 2009; 46(1). Disponible en: www.bvs.sld.cu/revistas/est/vol46_1_09/est04109.pdf [citado 2010 Mayo 06].

  5. De Boever AL, Keersmaekers K, Vanmaele G, Kerschbaum T, Theuniers G, De Boever JA. Prosthetic complications in fixed endosseous implant-borne reconstructions after an observations period of at least 40 months. J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Nov; 33(11): 833-9.

  6. Hobkirk JA, Wiskott HWA. Biomechanical aspects of oral implants.Consensus report of working group I.Clin Oral Implant. Res.2006; 17 (suppl.2): 52-4.

  7. Rosentiel S, Land M, Crispin B. Dental Luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 80: 280-301.

  8. Stevenson W, Harrod JT, Van Eyck MN. Retrospective analysis of 56 edentulous dental arches restored with 344 single-stage implants using an immediate loading fixed provisional protocol: statistical predictors of implant failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. September 1, 2007; 22(5): 823-30.

  9. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. Clin Oral Implants Res. December 1, 2007; 18(6): 707-14.

  10. Isaksson R, Becktor JP , Brown A , Laurizohn C. Oral health and oral implant status in edentulous patients with implant-supported dental prostheses who are receiving long-term nursing care. Gerodontology. 2009; 26(1): 245-249.

  11. May D, Romanos GE. Immediate implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained by conical crowns: A new treatment concept. Quintessence Int. 2006; 33: 5- 12.

  12. Gross MF. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun; 53 Suppl 1: S60-8.

  13. Iglesias MA, Moreno J. Obtención de ajuste clínico pasivo en prótesis sobre implante. Rev. Internacional de prótesis estomatológicas. 2004; 4(2): 290-297.

  14. Lemus LM, Justo M, Almagro Z, Sáez R, Triana K. Rehabilitación sobre implantes oseointegrados. Rev Cubana Estomatol [revista en la Internet]. 2009 Mar [citado 2010 Jun 26]; 46(1): Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034- 75072009000100008&lng=es

  15. Ashley ET, Covinto U, Bishop BG, Breaull LG. Ailing and failing endosseous dental implants: A literature review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2003 May;4(2):15.

  16. Expósito M, Murray-Curtis L, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. Intervenciones para el reemplazo de piezas dentales perdidas: diferentes tipos de implantes dentales (Cochrane Review). In: Biblioteca Cochrane Plus.2008; Issue 3.

  17. Echezarreta D, et al. Importancia de la Rehabilitación Implantológica frente a otros tipos de rehabilitación protésica. Rev haban cienc méd [revista en la Internet]. 2009 Nov [citado 2010 Mayo 09 ]. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/est/vol40_2_03/est03203.htm

  18. Chaushu G, Amiram T, Dayan D. Immediate Loading of single-tooth implants: Immediate versus Non-immediate Implantation. A clinical Report. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2007; 16(2):267-272.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com