medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2013, Number 6

<< Back

Rev ADM 2013; 70 (6)

Single-appointment indirect restorations of posterior teeth. A clinical case report

Cedillo VJJ, Cedillo FJE

Language: Spanish
References: 42
Page: 329-338
PDF size: 431.58 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Semi-direct posterior composite resin restorations for the treatment of teeth with extensive loss of tissue first appeared a number of years ago as an alternative to direct resin or amalgam restorations and indirect porcelain restorations. By using an extraoral technique to create the restoration, it is possible to optimize clinical work conditions and enhance the ultimate properties of the dental material used. The aim of this work is to present a case report of a technique in which a silicone model was used both to create a composite resin restoration and to affix it, all in a single appointment. A description of the entire clinical procedure will be provided, along with a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the clinical technique used.


REFERENCES

  1. Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, Loomans BA. The amalgam-free dental school. J Dent. 2004; 32 (5): 371-377.

  2. Burke FJ. Amalgam to tooth-coloured materials-implications for clinical practice and dental education: governmental restrictions and amalgam-usage survey results. J Dent. 2004; 32 (5): 343-350.

  3. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002; 133 (10): 1387-1398.

  4. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21 (1): 9-20.

  5. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96 (6): 433-442.

  6. Hirata RM. Alternativas clínicas de sistemas de resinas compostas laboratoriais - quando e como usar. Jornal Brasileiro de Clínica & Estética em Odontologia. 2000; 4 (19): 13-21.

  7. Ugalde VL. Restauraciones indirectas de cerómero. Facultad de Odontología. UCR. 2004; 6: 54.

  8. Burke FJ, Watts DC, Wilson NH, Wilson MA. Current status and rationale for composite inlays and onlays. Br Dent J. 1991; 171: 269-273.

  9. Burke EJ, Qualtrough AJ. Aesthetic inlays: composite or ceramic? Br Dent J. 1993; 176: 53-60.

  10. Milleding P. Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. An in vitro comparison with the direct technique. Acta Odontol Scand. 1992; 50: 295-301.

  11. Sheth PJ, Jensen ME, Sheth JJ. Comparative evaluation of three resin inlay techniques. Microleakage studies. Quint Int. 1989; 20: 831-836.

  12. Caudio SJ. The direct resin inlays: clinical protocol. Comp Cont Ed in Dent. 1983; 4: 292-301.

  13. James DF. An esthetic inlay technique for posterior teeth. Quint Int. 1983; 14: 725-731.

  14. Gorodovsky S, Zidan O. Retentive strength, disintegration, and marginal quality of luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 269-274.

  15. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymenzation contraction stress. J Dent Res. 1984; 63 (12): 1396-1399.

  16. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res. 1987; 66 (11): 1636-1639.

  17. Cedillo VJ. Factor C en operatoria dental. Revista ADM. 2010; 57 (2): 83-87.

  18. Wendt SL. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. 1: Diametril tensile strength, comprensive strength, and marginal dimensional stability. Quin Int. 1987; 18: 265-271.

  19. Wendt SL. The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite retins. 11: wear hardness and color stability. Quint Int. 1987; 18: 351-356.

  20. Uctasli S, Wilson HJ, Zaimoğlu L. Variables affecting the fracture toughness of resin-based inlay/onlay systems. J Oral Rehab. 1993; 20: 423-431.

  21. Asmussen E, Peutzfeld A. Mechanical properties of heat treated restorative resins for use in the inlay/onlay technique. Scand J Dent Res. 1990; 98: 564-567.

  22. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. Dent Mater. 1992; 8: 290-295.

  23. Ruyter IE. Types of resin-based inlay materials and their properties. Int Dent J. 1992-94 (3): 139-144.

  24. Covey DA, Tahaney SR, Davenport JM. Mechanical properties of heat-treated composite resin restorative materials. J Pros Dent. 1992; 68: 458-461.

  25. de Gee AJ, Pallav P, Werner A, Davidson CL. Annealing as a mechanism of increasing wear resistance of composites. Dent Mater. 1990; 6: 266-270.

  26. Ruyter IE. Types of resin-based inlay materials and their properties. Int Dent J. 1992-94 (3): 139-144.

  27. Suckert R. La técnica de inlays/onlays hoy. lnlay de composite elaborado en el laboratorio. Soproden. 1991; 63: 113-124.

  28. Levin RP. Direct composite inlays: a profitable practice-builder. Dent Manage. 1988; 28 (7): 40-42.

  29. Plasmans PJ, van’t HOF MA, Creugers NH. Fabrication times for indirect composite resin restorations. J Dent. 1992; 20: 27-32.

  30. Beeley JA, Yip HK, Stevenson AG. Chemo-mechanical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments. Br Dent J. 2000; 188: 427-430.

  31. El-Araby A, Al-Jabab A. The influence of some dentin primers on calcium hydroxide lining cement. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6 (2): 1-9.

  32. Cedillo VJ. Ionómero de vidrio de alta densidad como base en la técnica restauradora de sandwich. Revista ADM. 2011; 68 (1): 39-47.

  33. Henostroza HG et al. Adhesión en odontología restauradora. 2a. ed. Madrid, España: Ripano; 2010: 504-508.

  34. Daronch M, Rueggeberg FA, Moss L, de Goes MF. Clinically relevant issues related to preheating composites. J Esthet Rest Den. 2006; 18 (6): 340-350.

  35. Cantoro A, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Mazzitelli C, Fadda GM, Ferrari M. Effect of pre-cure temperature on the bonding potential. J Den Mat. 2005-2008; 24 (5): 577-583.

  36. Papacchini F, Magni E, Radovic I, Mazzitelli C, Monticellia F, Goracci C et al. Effect of intermediate agents and pre-heating of repairing resin on composite-repair bonds. J Oper Dent. 2007; 32 (4): 363-371.

  37. Magne P, Belser UC. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003; 23 (6): 543-555.

  38. Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Taschner M, Mehl A, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R. Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays. J Dent Res. 2006; 85 (12): 1097-1100.

  39. El-Mowafy O, Brochu JF. Longevity and clinical performance of IPS-Empress ceramic restorations–a literature review. J Can Dent Assoc. 2002; 68: 233-237.

  40. Urdaneta M, Yánez L, Torres B, Vega A, Urdaneta O. Incrustaciones de porcelana por el método CAD/CAM. Ensayo clínico. Ciencia Odontológica. 2012; 9 (2): 123-130.

  41. De la Macorra GJ. Incrustaciones de resina compuesta. Revista Europea de Odonto-Estomatología. 1995; 7 (2): 69-80.

  42. Santos GC Jr. G, Santos MJ. Overview of CEREC CAD/CAM chairside system. Gen Dent. 2013; 61 (1): 36-41.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com