medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica Electrónica

ISSN 1684-1824 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Méd Electrón 2013; 35 (6)

The teaching learning process of the clinical method. An experience with Medicine sixth -year students

Vidal TLA, Noda AA, Delgado FMR, Báez PE, Fernández MJ, Montell GO
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 606-613
PDF size: 51.63 Kb.


Key words:

clinical method, teaching learning process, Paediatrics.

ABSTRACT

The clinical method is the scientific method applied to the work with patients and is an essential part of the content the Medicine student has to know, requiring a constant correction during their daily practice. An observational quantitative research was carried out in the Matanzas Teaching Pediatric Hospital Eliseo Noel Caamaño Álvarez. We worked with the universe of the Medicine sixth-year students taking the matter of Pediatrics in the school year 2011-2012 (123 students). For collecting the information we applied an observational guide structured on the stages followed in the clinical method application, but characterized by deepening in each stage until reaching the saturation of the obtained information via repeating observation. The stages taken into account are identification and searching information on the patient´s problem, diagnosis and interpretation and finally decision taking and communitarian projection. Among the first stage results, the biggest difficulty was the deficient identification of the problem; during the diagnosis stage there it was lack of reasoning, and in the decision making stage problems with the therapeutic behavior; the communitarian projection was not successful. Though the students showed knowledge of the stages to follow in the clinical method, the reasoning and application of the method is considered unsatisfactory.


REFERENCES

  1. Álvarez de Zayas C. Hacia una escuela de excelencia. La Habana: Editorial Academia; 2001.

  2. Lizástigui Dupuy F. El método clínico: muerte y resurrección. Rev Cubana Educ Méd Super[Internet]. 2000[citado 29 Dic 2012] ; 14(2):109-27. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864- 21412000000200001&script=sci_arttext

  3. Centro de Estudios en Medicina Familiar (CEMF) "Ian McWhinney" [Internet]. Método Clínico Centrado en el Paciente (MCCP). Argentina: Centro; 2007 [citado 25 Abr 2010]. Disponible en: http://aequus.blogspot.com/2007/08/mtodo-clnico-centrado-en-el-paciente.html

  4. Cruz Hernández J, Hernández García P, Abraham Marcel E, Dueñas Gobel N, Salvato Dueñas A. Importancia del método clínico. Rev Cubana Salud Públ[Internet].2012[citado 29 Dic 2012]; 38 (3). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864-34662012000300009&script=sci_arttext

  5. Moreno Rodríguez MA. Crisis del método clínico. Rev Cubana Med [Internet]. 1998[citado 29 Dic 2012];37(2):123-8. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0034- 75231998000200010&script=sci_arttext&tlng=pt

  6. Corona Martínez LA. Los exámenes complementarios en la práctica médica asistencial. Algunas consideraciones útiles para el médico en formación. Medisur [Internet]. 2010 [citado 29 Dic 2012];8(5). Disponible en: http://www.medisur.sld.cu

  7. Moreno Rodríguez MA. El arte y la ciencia del diagnóstico médico. Principios seculares y problemas actuales. La Habana: Editorial Científico-Técnica; 2001.

  8. Prado Vega R, Zacatelco Ramírez OR, Ortiz Montalvo A, Ponce de León Castañeda ME. Evaluación del razonamiento clínico diagnóstico, uso de atractores dinámicos como alternativa. Gac Méd Méx [Internet]. 2002[citado 29 Dic 2012];138(5). Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/gaceta/gm-2002/gm025c.pdf

  9. Nasiff H, Rodríguez M, Moreno MA. Práctica clínica. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2010.

  10. Chapman DM, Char DM, Aubin C. Clinical decision making. In: Marx JA, Hockberger RS, Walls RM, eds. Rosen’s Emergency Medicine Concepts and Clinical Practice. 5th ed; 2002 .p. 107-15.

  11. Tanabe P, Gimbel R, Yarnold PR Kyriacou D, Adams JG. Reliability and validity of scores on the emergency severity index version 3. Acad Emerg Med[Internet]. 2004[citado 29 Dic 2012];11(1):59- 65. Disponible en: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1197/j.aem.2003.06.013/pdf

  12. Krueger GP. Fatigue, performance, and medical error. In: Bogner MS, ed. Human Error in Medicine. Nueva Jersey :Erlbaum; 1994.

  13. Ely JW, Graver ML, Croskerry P. Checklist to reduce diagnostic errors. Acad Med.2011;86(3):307- 13. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 21248608.

  14. Kassirer JP, Kopelman RL. Learning clinical reasoning. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1991.

  15. Wallenstein J, Heron S, Santen S, Shayne P, Ander D. A core competencybased objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) can predictfuture resident performance. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(suppl):S67–71. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 21199087.

  16. Friedman E, Sainte M, Fallar R. Taking note of the perceived valueand impact of medical student chart documentation on education and patient care. Acad Med. 2010;85(9):1440–4. Citado en pubMed; PMID: 20736671.

  17. Mamede S, Van Gog T, Van den Berge K, Rikers RM, Vvan Saase JL, Van Gulener C, et al. Effect of availability biasand reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. JAMA.2010; 304(11): 1198-1203. Citado en PubMed; PMID:20841533.

  18. Blanco Aspiazú MA, Oliva Torres L, Bosh Bayard RI, Méndez Rivero L, Suarez Bergado R. Evaluacion del razonamiento. Educ Med Super[Internet]. 2005[citado 29 Dic 2012];19(4). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864-21412005000400004&script=sci_arttext

  19. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to prevent them. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 78(8):775-80. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 12915363.

  20. Crockery P. Diagnostic Failure: A Cognitive and Affective Approach. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; 2005.

  21. Norman GR, Eva KW. Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2010; 44(1):94-100. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 20078760.

  22. Scott IA. Error in clinican reasoning: causes and remedial strategies. BMJ.2009; 338:b 1860. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 19505957.

  23. Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive development inquiry. Am Psicol [Internet]. 1979[citado 29 Dic 2012]; 34(10):906-11. Disponible en: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ217109

  24. Mamede S, Van Gog T, Van den Berge K. Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine resident. JAMA.2010;304 (11):1198-1203. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 20841533.

  25. Harrison TR. Decision-Making in Clinical Medicine. En: Principios de Medicina Interna. 16 ed. USA: Editorial Mc Graw-Hill Interamericana; 2005. p. 6-12.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Méd Electrón. 2013;35