Durán MK, Cruz GKM

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 276-288
PDF size: 114.42 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Solar damage in the skin affect great number of people. Methods. A transverse, prospective study was carried out in 35 people of Frontier Troop Detachment. A questionnaire was applied to evaluate the knowledge about solar damage in the skin. Results. The patients with phototypes II and III was predominated and sun exposition in the high radiation time in the last year was predominated too. In the main showed high knowledge about environment factors with middle knowledge about causes and clinical manifest ations of photo cutaneous damage. Even though, the people showed negative attitudes in relationship with the photoprotection in social and labor activities. Conclusions. A high risk to suffer solar cutaneous diseases was observed in the people. They are no t protected to the sun ultraviolet radiation and doing labor activities in the fresh air. Even so they have knowledge about photodamage and photoprotection they not approve preventives attitudes.

REFERENCES

1. Gutiérrez C. El día del lunar: campaña de educación, prevención y detección temprana del cáncer de piel y melanoma. 2010. Folia dermatol Peru 2010;21(1):7 -9.

2. Marcos-Gragera R. ¿Está aumentando el cáncer cutáneo en nuestro país? . Piel 2012;27(6):295-9.

3. McGregor JM, Hawk JL. Acute effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin. In: Freedberg I et al, editors. Dermatology in General Medicine. 5th ed. New York: McGraw -Hill; 2006. p. 1562-8.

4. Galán I, Rodríguez-Laso A, Díez-Gañán L, Cámara E. Prevalencia y f actores relacionados con las conductas de riesgo de cáncer de piel en Madrid (España). Gac Sanit 2011;25(1):23 -9.

5. Draelos ZD. Therapeutic moisturiz ers. Dermatologic Clinics 2004;18(4): 597-607.

6. Perricone NV. El libro antiarrugas. México: Editora Pan orama; 2003. p. 180.

7. Thompson MJ. Solar interior: Helioseismology and the Sun's interior. Astronomy & Geophysics 2004;45(4):21 -5.

8. Farrukh A, Hasan M . Photochemoprevention by Botanical Antioxidants. Skin Pharmacology and Applied Skin Physiology 2002;15 :297-306.

9. Escobar HM. Terapia de bioestimulación con plasma rico en plaquetas para el envejecimiento cutáneo. Rev Argent Dermatol 2012;93(1):98 -106.

10. Ríos JM. Correlación entre las Prácticas de Exposición Solar y el Grado de Fotodaño. Jornada de Prevención del Cáncer de Piel. Mayo de 2009. Revista M édico Científica 2010;23(1):12-9.

11. Kasting JF, Ackerman TP. Climatic Consequences of Very High Carbon Dioxide Levels in the Earth’s Early Atmosphere. Science 1986;234:1383 -5.

12. Davis S, Capjack L, K err N, Fedosejevs R. Clothing as protection from ultraviolet radiation: which fabric is most effective. International Journal of Dermatology 2007;36: 374-9.

13. De Buys HV, Levy SB, Murria JC, Madey DL, Pinnell SR. Dermatologic aspects of cosmetics. Modern approaches to photoprotection . Dermatologic Clinics 2000;18: 577- 90.

14. Pennell SR. Cutaneous photodamage, oxidative stress, and topical antioxidant protection. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:1 -19.

15. Viñas García M, Algozaín Acosta Y, Álvarez Campos L, Qu intana Díaz JC. Comportamiento del carcinoma basocelular facial en Artemisa durante la última década. Rev Cubana Estomatol 2011;48(2):85 -91.

16. Martínez G, Guerra MM. Dermatosis frecuentes en pacientes geriátricos de la ciudad de Matanzas. Rev Med Elec trón 2012;34(3):63-9.

17. Mora M, Olivares AV, González TM, Castro I. El sol: ¿enemigo de nuestra piel? . MEDISAN 2010;14(6):83 -7.