medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología

ISSN 1561-3100 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología 2013; 27 (2)

Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of extracapsular hip fractures

Amigo CP, Rodríguez DM, Domínguez LJL, Oliver MA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 173-185
PDF size: 296.47 Kb.


Key words:

hip fracture, osteosynthesis, intramedullary nail.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the trochanteric GT-estandard nail of the intramedullary nailing system has been designed and manufactured to treat proximal femoral fractures by minimally invasive surgery in a rational, comfortable and effective manner.
Objective: apply this treatment in patients hospitalized and assess their evolution.
Methods: prospective cross-sectional study. The study universe was composed of 280 patients with this hip fracture, hospitalized between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010 at José R. López Tabrane Provincial Clinical Surgical University Hospital in Matanzas. The sample consisted of 53 patients meeting the inclusion criteria.
Results: the intervention was performed on 53 patients with extracapsular fractures (29 %). There was a predominance of the male sex (64 %) and the 80-89 age group (43 %). In 64 % of these patients surgical time ranged between one and two hours. Only five patients (9 %) had complications: two wound hematomas, two loss of fixation and one migration of femoral neck screws. Only four patients (8 %) had to be transfused during the operative and postoperative stages. All patients were discharged alive, 75 % of them within 48 hours. Follow-up revealed that 56 % of patients were indicated to rest their foot on the floor within 15 days.
Conclusions: patients undergoing the treatment had a very good evolution.


REFERENCES

  1. Dominique H, Konstantin D. Slotted Intramedullary Hip Screw Nails Reduce Proximal Mechanical Unloading. Clin Orthop. 2003;406:176-14.

  2. Wang CJ, Brown CJ, Yettram AL, Procter P. Intramedullary nails: some design features of the distal end. Med Eng Phys. 2003;25(9):789-94.

  3. Brown CJ, Wang CJ, Yettram AL, Procter P. Intramedullary nails with two lag screws. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004;19(5):519-25.

  4. Holper B, Tschegg EK, Stanzl-Tschegg S, Gabbler C. Possibilities for improving fatigue properties of interlocking screws of solid tibial nails. A mathematical model with practical conclusions. Unfallchirurg. 2002;105(2):104-6.

  5. Lin J, Hou SM. Bending Strength and Holding Power. A Prototype Tibial Locking Screw. Clin Orthop. 2002;403:232-9.

  6. Kempf I, Grosse A, Beck G. Closed Locked Intramedullary Nailling. J Bone Joint Surg. 1985;67-A:709-19.

  7. Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert PT. Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73-B:330-4.

  8. Hardy D, Descamps P, Krallis P, Fabeck L, Smets, P, Bertens, et al. Use of an intramedullary hip-screw compared with a compression hip- screw with a plate for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 1998;80-A:618-30.

  9. Leung KS. Multicenter Trial of a Modified Gamma Nail in East Asia. En: Gahr RH, Leung KS, Rosenwaser MP, Roth W, editors. The Gamma locking nail. Einhorn-Presse Verlag. 1999:316-24.

  10. Thorngren KG. Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur. London: The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery; 1997.

  11. Boriani S, de Lure F, Campanacci L, Specchia L, Bungaro P, Regnoli, et al. A technical report reviewing the use of the 11-mm Gamma nail: interoperative femur fracture incidence. Orthopedics. 1996;19:597-600.

  12. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM. Intramedullary versus Extramedullary Fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop. 1998;348:87-94.

  13. Radford P, Needoff M, Webb J. A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the Gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg. 1993;75-B:89-93.

  14. Albareda J, Laclériga A, Palanca D, Paniagua L, Seral F. Complications and technical problems with the Gamma nail. Int Orthop. 1996;20:47-50.

  15. Aune A, Ekeland A, Odegaard B, Grogaard B, Alho A. Gamma nail vs Compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:127-30.

  16. Leung KS, Chen CM, So WS, Sato K, Lai CH, Machaisavariya B, et al. Multicenter trial of modified Gamma nail in east Asia. Clin Orthop. 1996;323:146-54.

  17. Rosenblum S, Zuckerman J, Kummer FJ, Tam BS. A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74-B:352-7.

  18. Valverde J, García Alonso M, Álvarez Ramos A, Gutiérrez J. Complicaciones del clavo Gamma corto. Rev Ortop Traumatol. 1998;42:131-4.

  19. Den Hartog BD, Bartal E, Cooke F. Treatment of the unstable intertrochanteric fracture. J Bone Joint Surg. 1991;73-A:726-33.

  20. Davis TRC, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter B, y Checketts R. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 1990;72-B:26-31.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Ortopedia y Traumatología. 2013;27