medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 03

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2014; 82 (03)

A case study of anaphylaxis in a pregnant woman

Ferreres-García K, de León-Luis J, Seoane E, García-Marqués E, Sanjuan C, Ortiz-Quintana L
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 188-193
PDF size: 801.04 Kb.


Key words:

Anaphylaxis, anaphylactic reaction, anaphylactic shock, pregnancy, pregnant women, allergy, preterm birth, neonatal prematurity.

ABSTRACT

We report a case of anaphylaxis in a 35+5 week of pregnancy patient who came to the Emergency Room with shortness of breath, hypotension and loss on fetal wellbeing. Due to her medical history and given the clinical picture at that time, an anaphylactic shock was suggested as the most probable diagnose. The administration of dexchlorpheniramine and methylprednisolone resulted in an immediate and positive reaction. Simultaneously, an improvement in the fetus cardiotocographic record was objectified. The patient was hospitalized for 48 hours, after which she was discharged. In case of suspicion of anaphylaxis in a pregnant woman, four aspects should be handled: the severity of the anaphylaxis chart, individual complications regarding a pregnant woman, unfavorable effects of the regularly used treatment during that specific gestation, and the need of fetal extraction based of gestational age.


REFERENCES

  1. Grabenhenrich L, et al. Implementation of anaphylaxis management guidelines: a register-based study. PLoS One 2012;7:e35778.

  2. Beyer K, et al. Anaphylaxis in an emergency setting-elicitors, therapy and incidence of severe allergic reactions. Allergy 2012;67:1451-6.

  3. Adkinson NF, Middleton E. Middleton’s allergy: principles & practice. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby/Elsevier 2009; 46,1765.

  4. Ring J, Behrendt H, Weck A. History and classification of anaphylaxis. Chem Immunol Allergy 2010;95:1-11.

  5. Berardi A, et al. Maternal anaphylaxis and fetal brain damage after intrapartum chemoprophylaxis. J Perinat Med 2004;32:375-7.

  6. Carlavilla-Martínez AB, García Sánchez FJCF, Gracia-Lorenzo V, Ibero-Esparza AC, y col. Manual de diagnóstico y terapeútica Médica. 6ª ed. Madrid: MSD Hospital Universitario 12 de octubre. 2007.

  7. Gei AF, et al. The use of a continuous infusion of epinephrine for anaphylactic shock during labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1332-5.

  8. Chaudhuri K, et al. Anaphylactic shock in pregnancy: a case study and review of the literature. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008;17:350-7.

  9. Sengupta A, Kohli JK. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section causing anaphylaxis and intrauterine fetal death. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008;34:252-4.

  10. Simons FE, Schatz M. Anaphylaxis during pregnancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;130:597-606.

  11. Reviriego J, Fernandez-Alfonso MS, Marin J. Actions of vasoactive drugs on human placental vascular smooth muscle. Gen Pharmacol 1990;21:719-27.

  12. Bytautiene E, et al. The effect of a mast cell degranulating agent on vascular resistance in the human placental vascular bed and on the tone of isolated placental vessels. Reprod Sci 2008;15:26-32.

  13. Sleth JC, et al. Anaphylaxis in terminal pregnancy: two case studies and review of the literature. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2009;28:790-4.

  14. Mak KK, et al. Effects of vasoactive autacoids on the human umbilical-fetal placental vasculature. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:99-106.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2014;82