medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Oftalmología

ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2013; 26 (3)

Intraocular lens power calculation through ultrasound biometrics

Elías GY, Torriente TV, Martínez LZ, Triana CI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 399-409
PDF size: 68.84 Kb.


Key words:

calculation, intraocular lens, ultrasound biometrics, Blumenthal technique.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To characterize the behavior of the intraocular lens calculation through ultrasound biometrics.
Methods: A prospective and descriptive study was conducted in a group of patients whose cataract was surgically treated with intraocular lens implantation by means of Blumental technique at the cataract service of "Enrique Cabrera" ophthalmological center. The sample was made up of 160 eyes. The studied variables included refractive surprise, age, axial length and keratometric average according to refractive result, dioptric power of the lens and spheral component by age.
Results: The main results were 78.7% of patients did not present lens power calculation errors, most of them were 60 years-old and over, the axial length range of 22 to 24.4(67.5%) prevailed, the keratometric average was 43 to 44.9 (64.3%), the dioptric power of the lens ranged +20 to +23 dioptries (48.2%) and the spheral component yielded 0.00 and+/- 1.00 dioptries (78.8%).
Conclusions: It is considered that ultrasound biometrics is suitable for a correct lens calculation.


REFERENCES

  1. Centurión V, Nicoli C, Villar-Kuri J. El libro del cristalino de las Américas. São Paulo: Livraira dos Santos; 2007. p. 25-32.

  2. Hernández Silva JR, Río Torres M, Ramos López M, Curbelo Cunill L, Capote Cabrera A, Pérez Candelaria E. Técnica de extracción extracapsular del cristalino por túnel córneo-escleral en el Instituto Cubano de Oftalmología Ramón Pando Ferrer, años 1999-2006. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [revista en Internet]. 2006 [citada 2011 feb 12];19(1):[aprox. 3 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864 -21762006000100009

  3. Centurión V, Nicoli C, Villar-Kuri J. El libro del cristalino de las Américas. São Paulo: Livraira Santos; 2007. p. 79-90.

  4. Drews RC. Common-sense determination of intraocular lens power. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991;22(11):632-7.

  5. Obuchowska I, Mariak Z. Sir Harold Ridley the creator of modern cataract surgery. Klin Oczna. 2005;107(4-6):382-4.

  6. Garg A, Hoyos JE, Dementiev D. Ocular biometry and intraocular lens power calculation in phaco and microphaco. En: Garg A, Lin JT, Latkany R. Mastering the techniques of IOL power calculations. New York: McGraw- Hill; 2005. p. 91-3.

  7. Werner L, Apple DJ, Pandey SK, Solomon KD, Snyder ME, Brint SF, et al. Analysis of elements of interlenticular opacification. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133( 3):320-6.

  8. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Cataract in the adult eye. Preferred Practice Patterns [serie en Internet]. 2006 [citada 2011 feb 12]. Disponible en: http://www.aao.org/ppp

  9. Hernández Silva JR, Padilla González CM, Ramos López M, Ríos Cazo R, Río Torres M. Personalización de las fórmulas de cálculo de lente intraocular. Rev Cub Oftalmol [revista en Internet]. 2004 [citada 2011 feb 12];17(2):[aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762004000200007

  10. Ballate Nodales EM, Márquez Fernández M, Rankin Bravo L, Salazar Chiu M. Errores en el cálculo del poder dióptrico del lente intraocular. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [revista en Internet]. 1998 [citada 2011 feb 12];11(1):[aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.bvs.sld.cu/revistas/oft/vol11_1_98/oft05198.htm

  11. Seitz B, Langenbucher A. Intraocular lens calculations status after corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000;11(1):35-46.

  12. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85(5):472-85.

  13. Longstaff S. Factors affecting intraocular lens power calculation. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1986;105(6):642-6.

  14. Orts Vila P, Devesa Torregrosa P, Tañá Rivero P, Bemonte Martínez J. Precauciones quirúrgicas en intercambios de lentes tras errores refractivos significativos. Microcirugía Ocular. 2003;11:9-11.

  15. de Oliveira F, Muccioli C, Lopes YC, Sone Soriano E, Belfort R Jr. Biometrias óptica e ultra-sônica: Comparação dos métodos usados para o cálculo da lente intra-ocular acomodativa. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2004; 67(6):887-91.

  16. Shammans HJ. Intraocular lens power calculations. Avoiding the errors. Glendale: The News Circle Publishing House; 1999. p. 36-54.

  17. Broman AT, Hafiz G, Muñoz B. Cataract and barriers to cataract surgery in a US Hispanic population. Arch Ophtahlm. 2005;123(2):1231-6.

  18. Halliday BL. Calculation of intraocular lens power: results in practice. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1986;105(4):435-40.

  19. Mejía Cruz NI, Naranjo Fernández RM, Menéndez Sánchez TJ, Castillo Pérez A. Resultados de implante de lente intraocular en niños. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [revista en Internet]. 2007 [citada 2011 feb 12];20(2):[aprox. 4 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864- 21762007000200009&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en

  20. Holladay JT. Intraocular lens power in difficult cases. Atlas of cataract surgery. Seatlle: Masket & Crandal, 1999. p. 147-58.

  21. Hernández Silva JR, Padilla González CM, Ramos López M, Ríos Cazo R, Río Torres M. Resultados de la facoemulsificación en 4 años de experiencia. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [revista en Internet]. 2004 [citada 2011 feb 12];17(2):[aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762004000200009

  22. Hernández Silva JR, Padilla González CM, Ramos López M, Ríos Cazo R, Río Torres M. Resultados quirúrgicos de la facoemulsificación por técnicas de Pre Chop. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [revista en Internet]. 2004 [citada 2011 feb 12];17(2):[aprox. 4 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864- 21762004000200010

  23. Ballate Nodales EM, Valle Delgado DM, Borges Pérez S, Sedeño Cruz I. Ametropía vs capsulotomía. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [revista en Internet]. 2001[citada 2011 feb 12];14(2): [aprox. 4 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864 -21762001000200002

  24. Hernández Silva JR, Padilla González CM, Ramos López M, Ríos Cazo R, Río Torres M. Resultados del Programa Nacional de Prevención de Ceguera por Catarata del 2000-2003. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [revista en Internet]. 2004 [citada 2011 feb 12];17(2):[aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864 - 1762004000200001&script=sci_arttext




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub Oftal. 2013;26