medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 2

<< Back

Salud Mental 2014; 37 (2)

Síndrome de burnout en población mexicana: Una revisión sistemática

Juárez-García A, Idrovo ÁJ, Camacho-Ávila A, Placencia-Reyes O
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 43
Page: 159-176
PDF size: 594.26 Kb.


Key words:

Professional burnout, MBI, Mexico, psychological stress, systematic review.

ABSTRACT

The growing number of publications on the subject of burnout syndrome suggests this is the most widely researched psychological workrelated outcome in the last decades. It is important to review the state of art in this phenomenon and to examine the challenging dimension that it has reached. The general objective of this paper was to carry out a systematic review of the published literature in order to characterize burnout research in Mexico.
Methods: A manual search was carried out in 12 databases including Spanish or Latin American journals. All the existent articles up to July 2012 were taken into account and five criteria were defined so as to assure the comparability among the studies. Meta-analyses were estimated with the averages of the burnout dimensions and the Cronbach alpha coefficients reported.
Results: Sixty-four studies were selected (n=13 801 employees); most of them were from health professionals and more than half were collected in Jalisco and Distrito Federal. The methodological analyses revealed that more than 90% of the studies were observational/cross-sectional designs, and most with data analyses that are vulnerable to the effect of confounding variables. A remarkable finding was the huge heterogeneity in the criteria used to determine the prevalence of burnout. The meta-analyses in 14 selected studies showed average burnout symptoms values of “once a month or less” within the frequency scale.
Discussion: The general balance of this review shows that the research on burnout in Mexico still has areas of opportunity. It is necessary to broaden the range of occupations and regions to improve the methodological designs and the information analyses, and to ensure the used scales have good psychometric properties. Some recommendations for future research are offered.


REFERENCES

  1. Schaufeli WB, Buunk BP Burnout. An overview of 25 years of research and theorizing. En: Schabracq M, Winnubst JAK, Cooper CL (eds). The handbook of work & health psychology. Segunda edición. Chichester: Wiley; 2002.

  2. Gil-Monte PR. Burnout syndrome: ¿síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo, desgaste profesional, estrés laboral o enfermedad de Tomás? Revista Psicología Trabajo Organizaciones 2003;19(2):181-197.

  3. Schwartz MS, Will GT. Low morale and mutual withdrawal on a mental hospital ward. Psychiatry 1953;16:337-353.

  4. Greene G. A burn-out case. Londres: William Heineman; 1960.

  5. Bradley HBS. Community-based treatment for young adult offenders. Crime Delinq 1969;15:359-370.

  6. Ginsburg SG. The problem of the burned out executive. Personnel J 1974;598-600.

  7. Freudenberger HJ. Staff burn-out. J Soc Iss 1974;30:159-165.

  8. Maslach C. Burned-out. Human Behavior 1976;5(9):16-22.

  9. Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Occup Behav 1981;2:99-113.

  10. Maslach C, Jackson S. Manual Maslach Burnout Inventory. USA: Consulting Psychology Press 1981.

  11. Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Maslach C. Burnout: 35 years of reseach and practice. Career Development International 2009;14:204-220.

  12. Schaufeli WB, Enzmann D. The Burnout companion to study and research: A critical analysis. Londres: Taylor & Francis; 1998.

  13. Kristensen TS, Borritz M, Villadsen E et al. The Copenhagen Burnout inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work Stress 2005;19:192-207.

  14. Gil-Monte PR, Moreno-Jiménez B (Comp.). El síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo (burnout): grupos profesionales de riesgo. Madrid: Pirámide; 2007.

  15. Maslach C, Jackson S, Leiter M. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. Tercera edición. USA: Mind Garden; 1996.

  16. Grajales T. Estudio de validez factorial del Maslach Burnout Inventory versión española en una población de profesionales mexicanos 2001:1- 10. Disponible en URL: http://www.tgrajales.net/mbivalidez.pdf

  17. Meda-Lara RM, Moreno–Jiménez B, Rodríguez-Muñoz A et al. Análisis factorial confirmatorio del MBI-HSS en una muestra de psicólogos mexicanos. Psicología Salud 2008;18(001):107–116.

  18. Botella J, Gambara H. Doing and reporting a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2006;6(2):425-440.

  19. Fazel S, Danesh J. Serious mental disorder in 23 000 prisoners: a systematic review of 62 surveys. Lancet 2002;359:545-550.

  20. Lee RT, Ashforth BE. A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of burnout. J Appl Psychol 1996;81:123-133.

  21. Lourel M, Gueguen N. A meta-analysis of job burnout using the MBI scale. Encephale 2007;33(6):947-953.

  22. Worley JA, Vassar M, Wheeler DL et al. Factor structure of scores from the Maslach Burnout Inventory: A review and meta-analysis of 45 exploratory and confirmatory factor-analytic studies. Educ Psychol Meas 2008;68:797-823.

  23. Aguayo R, Vargas C, De la Fuente EI et al. A meta-analytic reliability generalization study of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2011;11(2):343-361.

  24. Trufelli DC, Bensi CG, García JB et al. Burnout in cancer professionals: A systematic review and meta-analysis Eur J Cancer Care 2008;17(6):524-531.

  25. Danhof-Pont MB, van Veen T, Zitman FG. Biomarkers in burnout: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res 2011;70(6):505-524.

  26. Tomei G, Cinti ME, Palitti T, Rosati MV et al. L’evidenza scientifica in medicina del lavoro: studio meta-analitico sulla sindrome del burnout. Med Lav 2008;99:327-351.

  27. Pines A, Guendelman S. Exploring the relevance of burnout to Mexican blue collar women. J Vocat Behav 1995;47:1-20.

  28. Arita B, Arauz J. La tarea laboral y el síndrome de burnout en personal de enfermería. Psicología Salud 1998;11:13-22.

  29. Gil-Monte PR. Validez factorial de la adaptación al español del Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS) en una muestra de policías municipales. Salud Publica Mex 2002;44(1):33-40.

  30. Ferrando J, Pérez J. Un instrumento para medir quemazón profesional en los docentes: adaptación catalana del Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Rev Psiquiatría 1996;23(1):11-18.

  31. Gil–Monte P, Peiró JM. Desgaste psíquico en el trabajo: el Síndrome de Quemarse. España: Ed. Síntesis Psicología; 1997.

  32. Seisdedos N. MBI. Inventario «Burnout» de Maslach: manual. Madrid: TEA; 1997.

  33. Mingote AJC, Perez–Corral F. El estrés del médico. Madrid: Ed. Díaz de Santos; 1999.

  34. Gil-Monte PR, Peiró JM. Validez factorial del Maslach Burnout Inventory en una muestra multiocupacional. Psicothema 1999;11(3):679-689.

  35. Moreno-Jiménez B, Oliver-Hernández C, Aragoneses A. El burnout una forma específica de estrés laboral. En: Buela-Casal G, Caballo VE (ed.). Manual de psicología clínica aplicada. Madrid: Siglo XXI; 1991.

  36. Danesh J, Appleby P, Peto R. How often does surgery for peptic ulceration eradicate Helicobacter pylori? Systematic review of 36 studies. Br Med J 1998;316:746–747.

  37. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J 2003;327:557-560.

  38. Moreno-Jiménez B, Meda-Lara R, Rodríguez-Muñoz R, Palomera- Chavez A et al. El síndrome de burnout en una muestra de psicólogos mexicanos: prevalencia y factores sociodemográficos asociados. Psicología Salud 2006;16(1):5-13.

  39. Gil-Monte PR, Peiró JM. Un estudio comparativo sobre criterios normativos y diferenciales para el diagnóstico del síndrome de quemarse por el trabajo (burnout) según el MBI-HSS en España. Revista Psicología Trabajo Organizaciones 2000;16(2):135-149.

  40. Poghosyan L, Aiken LH, Sloane DM. Factor structure of the Maslach burnout inventory: an analysis of data from large scale cross-sectional surveys of nurses from eight countries. International J Nursing Studies 2009;46:894-902.

  41. Gil-Monte PR, Unda S, Sandoval JI. Validez factorial del “Cuestionario para la Evaluación del Síndrome de Quemarse por el Trabajo” (CESQT) en una muestra de maestros mexicanos. Salud Mental 2009;32(3):205-214.

  42. Moreno-Jiménez B, Bustos R, Matallana A, Miralles T. La evaluación del Burnout. Problemas y alternativas: validación del CBB. Rev Psicol Trabajo Org 1997;13(2):185-207.

  43. Uribe PF. Estudio confirmatorio de la escala mexicana de desgaste ocupacional (EMEDO): Un instrumento de burnout para mexicanos. Revista Interamericana Psicología Ocupacional 2007;26(1):7-21.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2014;37