medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Medicina Intensiva y Emergencias

ISSN 1810-2352 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Med Int Emerg 2011; 10 (2)

Role of the laryngeal mask during general anesthesia for emergency surgery

Rondón AJ, Vasallo CVJ, García RR, Díaz GI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 2111-2116
PDF size: 154.33 Kb.


Key words:

laryngeal mask, general anesthesia, emergency surgery.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The laryngeal mask, in circumstances and patients selected, is an aerial route with a minimal access more safe than the endotracheal tube.
Objective: To assess the use of the classic laryngeal mask in emergency surgery.
Methods: Eighty patients of both sexes were seen and classified according the ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status as I and II aged between 18 and 60, distributed at random two groups with 40 patients each. Patients received balanced general anesthesia using midazolam, isoflurane and atracurio. Airway was approached with: laryngeal mask (group I) and endotracheal tube (Group II). The following variants were assessed: age, sex, ASA, surgical time, anesthetic time, laryngeal mask, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen peripheral saturation.
Results: Regarding the previous ASA criteria there was predominance of type I (52,3%). The more used laryngeal mask used was the No. 4 for a 42,2%. As regards the mean surgical and anesthetic times, these were of 35 and 47 min, respectively. The mean systolic blood pressure before aesthesia was of 125,2 ± 17,8 mmHg and at the end of anesthesia it was of 109,2 ± 10,8 mmHg.
Conclusions: There were not significant differences between both groups compared as regards age, sex, ASA, surgical and anesthetic time and basal hemodynamic parameters. After insertion and extraction of devices there were significant differences noting a great hemodynamic stability using the laryngeal mask. The airway approach with the classic laryngeal mask in patients under general anesthesia produce less hemodynamic changes than when the endotracheal intubation is used.


REFERENCES

  1. Cordero IE. Estado actual del arte de la máscara laríngea. Rev Cubana de Anest y Ream 2004; 3(3):43-6.

  2. Brain AJ. The Laryngeal Mask: a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 2003; 55: 801-5.

  3. Álvarez Ríos JJ, Vaneas Hernández MA, Cano Juárez GZ. Mascarilla laríngea. Rev Mex Anest 2002; 25(1).

  4. Álvarez Ríos JJ, Vaneas Hernández MA, Cano Juárez GZ. Mascarilla laríngea. Rev Mex Anest 2002; 25(1).

  5. Acosta VM, Ramírez AJ. Innovaciones en el manejo no invasivo de la vía aérea. Anestesia en México 1994; 6: 353-4.

  6. Hath ML, Allagain J. The brain laryngeal mask airway as an aid to intubation. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64: 382-3.

  7. Baskett PJ. The intubating laryngeal mask. Result of a multicentre trial with experience of 500 cases. Anaesthesia 2005; 53: 1174-9.

  8. Rodríguez Dávila BE. Uso de máscara laríngea, en el manejo de la vía aérea, durante anestesia general, HEODRA.2004. [Tesis Monográfica para optar al Título de Especialista en Anestesiología]. León, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua, 2004.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub Med Int Emerg. 2011;10