medigraphic.com
SPANISH

MediSan

ISSN 1029-3019 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 07

<< Back Next >>

MediSan 2014; 18 (07)

Lesion severity profile of the maxillofacial skeletal trauma

Díaz FJM, Díaz CAL
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 978-985
PDF size: 165.98 Kb.


Key words:

maxillofacial skeletal trauma, trauma severity anatomical qualifier, injury mechanism, topographical diagnosis.

ABSTRACT

A descriptive, cross sectional and observational study of 335 patients with maxillofacial skeletal lesions due to different causes, assisted in the Maxillofacial Surgery Service from "Saturnino Lora Torres" Clinical Surgical Teaching Provincial Hospital in Santiago from Cuba was carried out from January, 2009 to December, 2010, with the aim of characterizing them according to the anatomical qualifiers of trauma severity, in relation to the injury mechanism and the topographical diagnosis of them. In the series the patients with 3 or more skeletal injuries (37.9%), pure or combined with the soft tissue of the orofacial component, as well as moderate injuries (60.0%) prevailed. In the polyinjured patients, severe lesions prevailed without danger for life (16-24 points) and the severe ones with danger for the life (25-40 points). On the other hand, the middle facial third turned out to be the anatomical region where the severe lesions were more frequently located with and without danger for life; while the moderate and light individual lesions prevailed in this same anatomical region.


REFERENCES

  1. Daval M, CHarrier J B. Cirugía de los traumatismos faciales. EMC- Cir Otorrinolaringol Cervicofac. 2012;13(1):1-28.

  2. Pon Y, Ukkola Pons E, Raynalo LM, Lepage P, Hunkemoller M. Traumatismos del tercio medio facial. EMC- Otorrinolaringol. 2011;40(2):1-17.

  3. Leles JR, Jorge FD, da Silva ET, Leles CR. Rish factors for maxillofacial injuries in a Brazilian emergency hospital simple. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18(19):23-9.

  4. Medina MJ. Maxillofacial fractures in chilian subjects. Int J Morphol. 2006;24(3):423-8.

  5. Hussaini HM. Maxillofacial trauma with emphasis on soft- tissue injuries in Malaysia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;61(109):1207-11.

  6. Manson PN, Manson PN, Stanwix MG, Yaremchuk MJ, Nam AJ, Hui-Chou H, et al. Frontobasal fractures: anatomical classification and clinical significance. Plast Reconst Surg. 2009;124(8):2096-2106.

  7. Peral CB, Barriendo LFG, Galdeano AM, Sánchez CL, Terrier HA. Estudio epidemiológico de urgencia en cirugía oral y maxilofacial. Rev Española Cir Oral Maxilofac. 2004;26(6):393–400.

  8. Liau JY, Woodlelief J, Van Aalst J. Pediatric nasoorbitoethmoid fractures. J Craneofac Surg. 2011;22(9):1843-8.

  9. Sánchez AG, Gutiérrez DR, García Piñeiro A, Castillo ER. Urgencias en cirugía maxilofacial I. Estudio clínico epidemiológico de los traumatismos faciales. Rev Esp Cir Oral Maxilofac. 2004;31(1):3–19.

  10. Sargent LA. Nasoethmoid orbital fractures: diagnosis and treatment. Plast Reconst Surg. 2009; 122(2):16- 31.

  11. Illescas Fernández GL. Escalas e índices de severidad del trauma. J Trauma. 2008; 11(1):88–94.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

MediSan. 2014;18