medigraphic.com

2004, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2004; 3 (3)

Anesthesic procedures in Radiology

Gómez LRN, Guerrero AGML

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 199-203
PDF size: 610.05 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this analysis is to define what type of anesthetic procedure is used in each of the different areas in the radiology and imaging department, with emphasis on the interventional radiological procedures, based on Mexican norms.

Methods: Pediatric patients are the main reason for the presence of an anesthesiologist in radiology units, in adults this occurs in a small group. Pre-anesthetic evaluation, the anesthetic techniques utilized, main complications of the anesthetic methods and their use in computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, ultrasound (US) and interventional radiology are shown in detail.

Conclusions: It is important that the anesthesiologist that handles patients in these areas of a Radiology and Imaging department is familiar with these, as well as with the procedures carried outside the operating room, to make the study or interventional procedure easier for the radiologist and with more safety for the patient.


REFERENCES

  1. Peden C, Menon D, Hall A y cols. Magnetic resonance for the anaesthetist. Part II. Anaesthesia and monitoring in MR units. Anesthesia 1992;47:508-511.

  2. NB McDermott, T. VanSickle, D. Motas, and R. H. Friesen. Validation of the Bispectral Index Monitor During Conscious and Deep Sedation in Children Anesth. Analg 2003; 97(1): 39 - 43.

  3. Coté Ch.J., Ryan J., Todres I., Goudsouzian N. Anestesia en pediatría. Segunda edición. Interamericana McGraw Hill. 1995.

  4. M. Rockoff, C. Coté, R. Kaplan;, D. Ertem, Y. Acar, E. Ozguven, E. Pehlivanoglu C, Bell RI. Parker, R. A. Mahan, G. Giugliano, and M. M. Parker. Sedation for Procedures. Pediatrics 1997; 100(6): 1045 - 1045.

  5. Malviya, T. Voepel-Lewis, A. R. Tait, S. Merkel, K. Tremper, and N. Naughton. Depth of sedation in children undergoing computed tomography: validity and reliability of the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). Br.J.Anaesth 2002;88: 241-245.

  6. S.A. Godambe, V. Elliot, D. Matheny, and J. Pershad. Comparison of Propofol/Fentanyl Versus Ketamine/Midazolam for Brief Orthopedic Procedural Sedation in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatrics Jul 2003; 112(1): 116 - 123.

  7. Paul F White y cols. Manual de fármacos en anesthesia. Primera edición. McGraw-Hill Interamericana. 1998.

  8. Havel C.J., Strait.R.T., and H. Hennes. A Clinical Trial of Propofol vs Midazolam for Procedural Sedation in a PediatricEmergency.Department Acad.Emerg.Med. 1999; 6(10):989-997.

  9. NH Jorgensen, JM Messick, Jr, J Gray, M Nugent, and TH Berquist .ASA monitoring standards and magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Analg 1994;79: 1141-1147.

  10. Burk NS. Anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging. Anesth Clin North Am 1989; 7:703-707.

  11. S. Malviya, T. Voepel-Lewis, O. P. Eldevik, D. T. Rockwell, J. H. Wong, and A. R. Tait. Sedation and general anaesthesia in children undergoing MRI and CT: adverse events and outcomes. Br. J. Anaesth. 2000; 84: 743-748.

  12. JR Tobin, EA Spurrier, and RC Wetzel. Anaesthesia for critically ill children during magnetic resonance imaging. Br. J. Anaesth 1992; 69: 482-486.

  13. D.S Beebe, P.Tran, M.Bragg, A.Stillman, C.Truwitt, and K.G.Belani. Trained nurses can provide safe and effective sedation for MRI in pediatric patients- .Can.J.Anesth, 2000;47(3):205-210.

  14. Young WL, Pile-Spellman J. Anesthetic considerations for interventional neuroradiology.Anesthesiology 1994; 80:440-442.

  15. Greenberger PA. Contrast media reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984; 74: 600-605.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com