medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cardiología

ISSN 0188-2198 (Print)
En 2019, la Revista Mexicana de Cardiología cambió a Cardiovascular and Metabolic Science

Ver Cardiovascular and Metabolic Science


  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cardiol 2014; 25 (3)

Echocardiographic evaluation of patients after aortic valve replacement. Do we follow the guidelines?

Carmona-Ruiz HA, Arias-Godínez JA, Ávila-Vanzzini N, Romero-Aragonés C, Roldán-Gómez FJ, Ruiz-Esparza-Dueñas ME, Romero-Cárdenas Á, Vázquez-Antona C
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 158-162
PDF size: 158.99 Kb.


Key words:

Prosthetic valve dysfunction, aortic valve replacement, prosthetic valve, echocardiogram, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the methodology for the echocardiographic evaluation of patients with aortic valve replacement at the Instituto Nacional de Cardiología. Method: We included all consecutive patients, 18 years old or more with aortic valve replacement secondary to aortic stenosis at the Instituto Nacional de Cardiología «Ignacio Chávez», between January 2011 and June 2012. We described the date of the surgery, type of prosthetic valve and the number and date of the echocardiograms after the valve replacement. Results: Between January 2011 and June 2012, 100 patients underwent aortic valve replacement. In 81% the first echocardiogram was made during hospitalization. The first evaluation was made within the first 24-48 hours in 42 patients (51.8%), between the 3rd and 7th day in 27 patients (33.3%), between the 8th and the 14th day in 7 patients (8.6%) and after 14 days in 5 patients (6.1%). No echocardiogram was made in 19 patients. Conclusions: At the Instituto Nacional de Cardiología «Ignacio Chávez» we made an echocardiographic evaluation and follow up different from the international recommendations for patients with valve replacement.


REFERENCES

  1. Lakowsky A, Lopez-Soutric G. Prótesis valvulares cardiacas. PROSAC. 2009; 4: 81-107.

  2. Seiler C. Management and follow up of prosthetic heart valves. Heart. 2004; 90: 818-824.

  3. Pibarot P, Dumesnil J. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic valve function. Heart. 2012; 98: 69-78.

  4. Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers J, Evangelista A, Griffin B et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009; 1: 1-23.

  5. Zoghbi W, Chambers J, Dumesnil J, Foster E, Gottdiener J, Grayburn P et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and Doppler ultrasound. JASE. 2009; 22: 975-1014.

  6. Tasca R, Gonçalves-Tasca M, Paulo De Araujo-Amorim P. Evaluación ecocardiográfica de las prótesis valvulares cardiacas. Rev Bras Ecocardiogr Imagem Cardiovasc. 2011; 24: 58-83.

  7. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes M, Barón-Esquivias G, Baumgartner H et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 2451-2496.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cardiol. 2014;25