medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río

ISSN 1561-3194 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Ciencias Médicas 2014; 18 (6)

Postoperative evolution of surgical wound closure by secondary intention in third molars

Morejón ÁFC, Álvarez RY
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 1008-1016
PDF size: 139.01 Kb.


Key words:

Impacted tooth/surgery, Third molar/surgery.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: third molar surgery is a treatment often performed during the dentistry practice work. Nowadays it is the most used conventional surgical technique.
Objective: to evaluate the postoperative results in patients with non-semi-retained mandibular molars, with closure of the wound by secondary intention, regarding aspects such as the presence of pain, edema, bleeding, sepsis and mandibular trismus.
Methods: an analytical, longitudinal, prospective case-control study was conducted at Abel Santamaria Cuadrado General Teaching Hospital in Pinar del Río, in the period from September 2010 to July 2013. The sample consisted of 120 patients attending the maxillofacial surgery office because of semi-retained mandibular third molars. For statistical analysis we used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic methods and the Fisher exact probability variant.
Results: for the 60 patients operated by conventional surgical suture with vestibular flap, after 72 hours pain appeared, and it was moderate in 48-80%, and at 12 hours, it was intense for the 20%. For the 60 patients operated by surgical technique with wound closure by secondary intention, after 72 hours only 15 patients (25%) had mild pain.
Conclusions: There was a better postoperative result in patients with surgical wound closure by secondary intention, with 45% of the patients with no pain and 90% with slight edema after 72 hours of surgery; the study showed no symptoms such as bleeding, sepsis, or mandibular trismus.


REFERENCES

  1. Ali HH. Pattern of third molar impaction in a Saudi population. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2010: 2; 109-113. Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río. 2014; 18(6): 1008-1016

  2. Larrazábal Morón C, Galán Gil S, Peñarrocha Diago M. Revisión bibliográfica de los artículos publicados de cirugía bucal en el año 2005. Rev Esp Cirug Oral y Maxilofac. 2008 ago; 30(4): 225-245.

  3. Lazaridou M, Galitsiou V, Divanidou C, Tilaveridis I. A study of the correlation between second molar distal caries and third molar eruption. Hellenic Archives of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 2012; 3: 159-166.

  4. Da Costa MG, Pazzini CA, Garcia Pantuzo MC, Ramos Jorge ML, Silva Marques L. Is there justification for prophylactic extraction of third molars? A systematic review. Braz Oral Res(São Paulo). 2013 mar-apr; 27(2):183-8.

  5. Ramírez A, Rodríguez GM, Sánchez PR. Conveniencia de la cirugía profiláctica del tercer molar retenido: un análisis de decisiones. Rev. fac. med. 2008 june; 56(2): 125-132.

  6. Hernández Pedroso L, Raimundo Padrón E. Intervenciones quirúrgicas realizadas en dientes retenidos a pacientes de la población de IBB. República de Yemen.

  7. Reinoso E. Intervenciones quirúrgicas realizadas en dientes retenidos a pacientes de la población de IBB, Republica de Yemen. Portales Médicos. 2011; 16(1).

  8. Infante-Cossío P. Comparación del postoperatorio de dos colgajos en cirugía de terceros molares inferiores. Rev Esp Cirug Oral y Maxilofac. 2009 Jun; 31(3): 193- 195.

  9. Casas del Valle L, Aparicio Molares P, Uribe Fenner F, Alcocer Carvajal D. Comparación del postoperatorio de dos colgajos en cirugía de terceros molares inferiores. Rev Esp Cirug Oral y Maxilofac. 2009 Jun; 31(3): 185-192.

  10. Díaz-Condal C, Rojas Sánchez R, Gaete García C, Muñoz-Smitmans C. Eliminación quirúrgica de tercer molar. Acta Odontol Venez. 2012; 50(3).

  11. Flores Ramos JM, Aguilar Orozco SH, Ochoa Zaragoza MG. La betametasona (fosfato sódico + acetato) previene la inflamación y el trismo en la cirugía del tercer molar inferior retenido. glucocorticoides en cirugía del tercer molar. Revista ADM. 2013; 70(4): 190-196.

  12. Simone JL, Jorge Waldyr A, Ratto Tempestini HAC, Canaval Talita G, Tortamano Peixoto I. Comparative analysis of preemptive analgesic effect of dexamethasone and diclofenac following third molar surgery. Braz. oral res. 2013 Jun; 27(3): 266- 271.

  13. Correa PE. Principios quirúrgicos en cirugía oral y maxilofacial. Medellín: Colombia; Wordpress.

  14. Leal de Moura W, Leal de Moura W, da Silva Rodrigues Freire AS, Moura Mendes S, Olate S. Eficacia del Tratamiento con Amoxicilina en la Prevención de Complicaciones Postoperatorias en Pacientes Sometidos a Cirugía del Tercer Molar: un Estudio Doble Ciego. Int. J. Odontostomat. 2011; 5(2): 147-152.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Ciencias Médicas. 2014;18