medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo

ISSN 1991-9395 (Electronic)
ISSN 1608-6384 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo 2014; 15 (3)

Assessment of the work environment and possible association with the health of the worker exposed to dust

Díaz PH, González CRM, Argote RL, Ibarra FVEJ, Cabrera GC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 19-23
PDF size: 201.93 Kb.


Key words:

exposure, dust pollution, ceramics, occupational morbidity.

ABSTRACT

An observational cross-sectional study was conducted to characterize the working population in an enterprise producing sanitary ware and tiles, where the main contaminant is dust. Morbidity through the medical certificates submitted was assessed and an individual survey to the 25 % of the exposed workers was applied directly. In the machining area draining 80 % of the jobs exceeded the permissible limit values to obtain values exceeding 5.6 times the allowable average concentration of the pollutant. Likewise; the area of tile also had the value of the dust concentration which is higher than the allowable value set respirable fraction of 1.5 times. 66.7% of the certificates corresponded to the area where sanitary ware is made; the main causes are related to diseases of the respiratory system (20.4 %) and injuries (10.2 %). 20.9 % of all certificates correspond to ostiomioarcticular system pathologies. These pathologies are associated with the risk.


REFERENCES

  1. .Alkaino J, Guerrero C, Arenas L. Evaluación cuali-tativa del riesgo de exposición a sílice para el rubro Fábrica de cerámicas (C). Santiago de Chile: Institu-to de Salud Pública de Chile; 2009.

  2. Lauwerys RR. Toxicología industrial e intoxicaciones Profesionales. París: Masson; 1994. p. 339-425.

  3. Attolini J. Hipersensibilidad broncopulmonar a los polvos - Bisinosis. Rev Salud Ocupacional. 1990;8 (41):20.

  4. International Organization for Standardization. ISO IEC 17025. General requirements for the compe-tence of testing and calibration laboratories. 2005.

  5. Oficina Nacional de Normalización. Norma Cubana NC 872:2011. Seguridad y salud en el trabajo – sus-tancias nocivas en el aire de la zona de trabajo – eva-luación de la exposición laboral – requisitos genera-les. La Habana: ONN; 2011.

  6. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Threshold limit values for chemical sub-stances and physical agents and biological exposures indices. Cincinnati: ACGIH; 2005.

  7. Ibarra E. Ambiente químico y salud en el trabajo. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2009. p. 222.

  8. National Institute for Occupational and Safety Health. NIOSH manual of analytical methods. Method Nº 0600. Particulates not or otherwise regu-lated, respirable. Cincinnati: NIOSH; 2005.

  9. National Institute for Occupational and Safety Health. NIOSH manual of analytical methods. Method Nº 0500. Particulates not or otherwise regu-lated, total. Cincinnati: NIOSH; 2005.

  10. Kari-Pekka M. Reducing sickness absenteeism at the work place- What to do and how? Scand J work En-viron Health. 2006;32(4):253-5.

  11. Rojas EI, Domínguez A, Rodríguez JC, Macías B, Garcí L, Clapé O, Berenguer CA, Fong O. Identifi-cación y prevención de riesgos de origen químico en centros laborales de Santiago de Cuba. Salud de los Trabajadores. 2006;14(1):71-5.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo. 2014;15